|
|
Effect of transarticular decompression fusion combined with Dynesys dynamic stabilization system in the treatment of patients with lumbar degenerative disease |
DU Xinchong1 WANG Jun1 LI Huaguang1 WANG Yanbo1 YANG Yipeng2 ZhANG Peinan1 |
1.Department of Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Hebei Province, Zhangjiakou 075000, China;
2.Department of Orthopaedics, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050051, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore and analyze the effect of transarticular decompression fusion combined with Dynesys dynamic stabilization system in the treatment of patients with lumbar degenerative disease. Methods From August 2014 to August 2015, 100 patients with lumbar degenerative disease admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University were selected as the research subjects and divided into the control group and the observation group by the random number table, with 50 cases in each group. The control group treated with transarticular decompression treatment, while the observation group treated with transarticular decompression fusion combined with Dynesys dynamic stabilization system. The overall lumbar activity, lumbar segment activity, adjacent intervertebral activities, adjacent intervertebral height and lumbar function score (ODI) were compared preoperative, posteoperative of 1, 12 month and 24 month between the two groups. Results Before operation, there was no statistically signicant difference in the overall lumbar activity between the two groups (P > 0.05); after operation of 1, 12 month and 24 month, the overall lumbar activity in the two groups were all lower than those of before operation; and with the extension of time, the overall lumbar activity in the two groups were all increased, and the indicator in the observation group increased much more significantly than that of control group, with statistically signicant difference (P > 0.05). Before operation, there was no statistically signicant difference in the lumber segment activity between the two groups (P > 0.05); after operation of 1, 12 month and 24 month, the lumber segment activity in the two groups were all lower than those of before operation; and with the extension of time, the lumber segment activity in the two groups were all increased, and the indicator in the control group increased much more significantly than that of observation group, with statistically signicant difference (P < 0.05). Before operation, there was no statistically signicant difference in the adjacent intervertebral activities between the two groups (P > 0.05); after operation of 1, 12 month and 24 month, the adjacent intervertebral activities in the two groups were all higher than those of before operation; and with the extension of time, the adjacent intervertebral activities in the two groups were all increased, and the indicator in the observation group increased much more significantly than that of control group, with statistically signicant difference (P > 0.05). There was no statistically signicant difference in the adjacent intervertebral height between the two groups before and after operation of 1, 12 month and 24 month (P > 0.05). Before operation, there was no statistically signicant difference in the score of ODI between the two groups (P > 0.05), after operation of 1, 12 month and 24 month, the scores of ODI were all lower than those of before operation; and the scores of 1 month and 12 month in the observation group decreased much more significantly than that of control group, with statistically signicant difference (P < 0.05). Conclusion Transarticular decompression fusion combined with Dynesys dynamic stabilization system can effectively increase the lumbar range of motion in patients with lumbar degenerative disease, relieve the postoperative pain and improve the clinical efficacy of patients. It is worthy of clicical promotion and application.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 尚凯,陈铭吉,王德国,等.椎旁肌间隙人路经椎弓根动态稳定固定结合经关节突减压治疗腰椎退行性病变的疗效观察[J].中华医学杂志,2017,97(19):1496-1501.
[2] 王自力.Dynesys动态稳定系统对退变性腰椎侧凸患者的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,12(12):3347-3349.
[3] 朱丹杰,邹成,杨迪,等.Dynesys动态稳定系统治疗伴邻近节段退变腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效[J].浙江医学,2016,38(23):1882-1886.
[4] 辛荣超.Dynesys动态稳定系统与植骨融合术治疗退变性腰椎不稳近期临床疗效分析[D].成都:成都中医药大学,2015.
[5] 陈智彪.Dynesys动态固定治疗腰椎退行性疾病的中期临床疗效观察[D].福州:福建医科大学,2014.
[6] 卫沛然,邹德威,陈晓明,等.后路减压Dynesys动态固定与后路减压融合内固定治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效的比较[J].颈腰痛杂志,2014,35(2):90-95.
[7] Mobbs RJ,Phan K,Malham G,et al. Lumbar interbody fusion:techniques,indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF,TLIF,MI-TLIF,OLIF/ATP,LLIF and ALIF [J]. J Spine Surg,2015,1(1):2-18.
[8] Lee SW,Kim SY. Comparison of chronic low-back pain patients hip range of motion with lumbar instability [J]. J Phys Ther Sci,2015,27(2):349-351.
[9] 刘臻,邱勇.Oswestry功能障碍指数在腰痛患者中的国际化应用现状[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2008,18(7):550-553.
[10] Puntumetakul R,Areeudomwong P,Emasithi A,et al. Effect of 10-week core stabilization exercise training and detraining on pain-related outcomes in patients with clinical lumbar instability [J]. Patient Prefer Adherence,2013,19(7):1189-1199.
[11] Lee SW,Kim SY. Effects of hip exercises for chronic low-back pain patients with lumbar instability [J]. J Phys Ther Sci,2015,27(2):345-348.
[12] 侯煜,田少辉,卜宏建,等.后正中入路Dynesys置入对腰椎全椎板减压术后生理性稳定性的作用[J].临床神经外科杂志,2015,21(1):51-53,57.
[13] Sears WR,Sergides IG,Kazemi N,et al. Incidence andprevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis [J]. Spine J,2011,11(1):11-20.
[14] Schnake KJ,Schaeren S,Jeanneret B,et al. Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis [J]. SPINE,2006,31(4):442-449.
[15] 谢雁春,刘军,于海龙,等.K-Rod动态稳定系统与 Dynesys非融合系统在多节段腰椎退变中的近期疗效比较[J].中国临床实用医学,2015,17(2):3-6.
[16] 罗琳,伍光辉.Dynesys非融合动态系统在腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察[J].内蒙古中医药,2014,33(1):7-9.
[17] 凌超,关凯,刘智.减压结合动态稳定系统(Dynesys)治疗腰椎退行性病变的临床疗效观察[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2013,6(2):121-125.
[18] Fayyazi AH,Ordway NR,Park SA,et al. Radiostereometric analysis of postoperative motion after application of dynesys dynamic posterior stabilization system for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2010,23(4):236-241.
[19] Lin HM,PanYN,Liu CL,et al. Biomechanical comparison of the K-ROD and Dynesys dynamic spinal fixator systems-A finite element analysis [J]. BIO-MED MATER ENG,2013,23(6):495-505.
[20] 胡勇,顾勇杰,徐荣明,等.Dynesys动态固定联合减压治疗腰椎退行性疾病临床随访结果分析[J].中华外科杂志,2012,50(12):1133-1135. |
|
|
|