|
|
Effect of radical hysterectomy with preservation of pelvic autonomic nerve on postoperative quality of life in patients with middle aged cervical cancer |
LENG Shaohua1 WANG Yanzhou2 ZHAO Xiaolan3▲ |
1.Department of Health Management, Southwest Hospital of Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China;
2.Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Southwest Hospital of Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China;
3.Physical Examination Center, Southwest Hospital of Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To analyze the effect of laparoscopic nerve sparing radical hysterectomy (LNSRH) with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation on postoperative quality of life in middle-aged patients with cervical cancer and to explore its clinical value. Methods One hundred and seventy-three cases of middle age cervical cancer treated in the Southwest Hospital of Army Military Medical University from July 2014 to July 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the surgical procedure for the treatment of patients, 89 cases received LNSRH were included into the LNSRH group, while 84 patients treated with the conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) were enrolled into LRH group. The situation of operation, recovery and complications of patients were compared between the two groups, and the cervical cancer function evaluation system (FACT-Cx) was used to evaluate the changes of life quality before and 6 months after surgery. Results The operative time in LNSRH group was longer than that in LRH group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the amount of bleeding and lymph node dissection between the two groups (P > 0.05). The indwelling time, residual urine volume, exhaust time and defecation time of LNSRH group were all lower than that in LRH group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of urinary retention in LNSRH group was lower than that in LRH group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In LNSRH group, there was no significant change in quality of life 6 months after operation (P > 0.05). The scores of additional attention items and FACT-Cx total score 6 months after operation in LRH group were significantly lower than those in preoperative group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The LNSRH surgery can effectively avoid pelvic nerve injury, shorten the postoperative function recovery of bowel and bladder, reduce postoperative complication risk and mitigate the adverse effects of surgery on the quality of life, is a safe and effective operation, worthy of promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Derks M,van der Velden J,Frijstein MM,et al. Long-term Pelvic Floor Function and Quality of Life After Radical Surgery for Cervical Cancer:A Multicenter Comparison Between Different Techniques for Radical Hysterec?鄄tomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy [J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2016,26(8):1538-1543.
[2] 张盛苗,陈龙,张萍,等.保留盆腔自主神经对宫颈癌患者术后性生活质量影响的探讨[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2014,30(11):878-881.
[3] 张静,陈丽春.腹腔镜下根治性子宫切除术中系统保留盆腔自主神经的临床效果[J].中国妇幼保健,2015,30(21):3742-3744.
[4] Basaran D,Dusek L,Majek O,et al. Oncological outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer:a systematic review [J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2015,22(9):3033-3040.
[5] 周昌仙.系统保留盆腔自主神经的广泛性子宫切除术对子宫颈癌及子宫内膜癌患者术后膀胱和直肠功能的影响[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2014,17(2):77-79.
[6] Derks M,van Lonkhuijzen LR,Bakker RM,et al. Long-Term Morbidity and Quality of Life in Cervical Cancer Survivors:A Multicenter Comparison Between Surgery and Radiotherapy as Primary Treatment[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2017,27(2):350-356.
[7] Cella DF,Tulsky DS,Gray G,et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale:development and validation of the general measure [J]. J Clin Oncol,1993,11(3):570-579.
[8] Marshall JR,Haber J,Josephson EB. An evidence-based approach to emergency department management of acute urinary retention [J]. Emerg Med Pract,2014,16(1):1-20.
[9] 邵玉婷,王丽媛.保留盆腔自主神经根治性宫颈癌手术对患者直肠及性功能的影响分析[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2017,16(11):1073-1076.
[10] 刘尧芳,叶海琼,詹平,等.保留盆腔自主神经广泛性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌疗效分析[J].现代医药卫生,2015, 31(8):1142-1144.
[11] Kim HS,Kim K,Ryoo SB,et al. Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer:a meta-analysis [J]. J Gynecol Oncol,2015,26(2):100-110.
[12] 齐周芳,徐惠成,姚宏,等.系统保留盆腔自主神经的广泛子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌及子宫内膜癌的临床效果分析[J].现代生物医学进展,2015(22):4337-4340.
[13] Roh JW,Lee DO,Suh DH,et al. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer:a randomized controlled trial [J]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2015,26(2):90-99.
[14] 葛伟平,陈龙,张萍,等.保留盆腔自主神经的腹腔镜广泛子宫切除术对膀胱和直肠功能恢复的影响[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(9):816-818.
[15] Bogani G,Cromi A,Uccella S,et al. Nerve-sparing versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy:a minimum 12 months’follow-up study [J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2014,24(4):787-793.
[16] Katepratoom C,Manchana T,Amornwichet N. Lower urinary tract dysfunction and quality of life in cervical cancer survivors after concurrent chemoradiation versus radical hysterectomy [J]. Int Urogynecol J,2014,25(1):91-96.
[17] 袁春燕,丁波,彭丹红,等.保留盆腔自主神经的根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌疗效的Meta分析[J].循证医学,2014,14(6):354-360.
[18] Kim HS,Kim TH,Suh DH,et al. Success factors of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for preserving bladder function in patients with cervical cancer:a protocol-based prospective cohort study [J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2015,22(6):1987-1995.
[19] Kavallaris A,Zygouris D,Dafopoulos A,et al. Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer. Latest developments and review of the literature [J]. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol,2015,36(1):5-9.
[20] 吴翠杰,崔静雯.保留盆腔自主神经的宫颈癌根治术后患者性生活质量观察[J].中国性科学,2016,25(1):50-52.
[21] 陈丹,朱琴,李明明,等.宫颈癌患者腹腔镜广泛子宫切除术中盆腔自主神经功能保留对患者性功能的影响分析[J].中国性科学,2017,26(11):40-42.
[22] Yokoyama Y,Fukui A,Fukuhara R,et al. Urinary Satisfaction of Patients Who Underwent Robot-Assisted Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy [J]. J Tumor,2015, 3(1):288-291. |
|
|
|