|
|
Study on tear film grading diagnosis with domestic LY-121 tear film interference imager |
CHEN Changxi ZHANG Yang ZHANG Jingshang AN Ying DENG Shijing WAN Xiuhua CAO Kai WANG Jinda▲ |
Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing Tongren Eye Center Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing 100005, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the reliability and repeatability of domestic LY-121 tear film interference imager for tear film grading diagnosis. Methods Twenty-two patients (43 eyes) with dry eye symptoms in the ophthalmic clinic of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University from March to September 2018 were collected. The domestic LY-121 tear film interference imager was used to take tear film images, and the diagnostic grades were performed according to the Japanese DR-I tear film grading standard. One ophthalmologist graded the same batch of images at different time periods, and another ophthalmologist graded the same batch of images. The weighted Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the consistency among physicians and within physicians, as well as the consistency between domestic LY-121 tear film interference imager and foreign equipment. Results LY-121 tear film interference imager had clear tear film imaging. The number of eyes diagnosed at grade 1 to 4 by the same physician twice was 6, 17, 12, 8 and 6, 18, 14, 5, respectively. The consistent proportion between the two was 88.4%, with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). Kappa value was 0.818 (95%CI: 0.707, 0.929). Comparison of grade 1 to 4 diagnosis results between the two physicians: 6, 17, 12, and 8 eyes were graded by doctor 1 and 7, 21, 10 and 5 eyes were graded by doctor 2. The consistent proportion between the two was 76.8%, with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). Kappa value was 0.781 (95%CI: 0.775, 0.787). Comparison of the two instruments: the diagnostic results of the domestic LY-121 tear film interference imager were 6, 17, 12 and 8 eyes respectively, and the diagnostic results of OCULUS eye-surface comprehensive analyzer were 6, 15, 12 and 8 eyes respectively, and there was no statistical significance between them (P > 0.05). Kappa value was 0.862 (95%CI: 0.803, 0.921). Conclusion The consistency and repeatability of domestic LY-121 tear film interference imager in the diagnosis of dry eye disease are good, and the performance is not inferior to that of imported mature equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 亚洲干眼协会中国分会,海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会眼科学专业委员会眼表与泪液病学组,中国医师协会眼科医师分会眼表与干眼学组.中国干眼专家共识:定义和分类(2020年)[J].中华眼科杂志,2020,56(6):418-422.
[2] 阎慧,赵少贞.干眼症临床检查的新进展[J].眼科新进展,2008,28(9):711-714.
[3] 蓝倩倩,满平仪,曾思明.泪膜稳定性检测方法的研究概况[J].中国临床新医学,2016,9(2):175-178.
[4] 孙铁,石文卿,邵毅.干眼成像技术的研究进展[J].国际眼科杂志,2019,19(6):937-940.
[5] 李倩,薛劲松,蒋沁.Oculus眼表综合分析仪在干眼诊断中的应用[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2016,34(9):953-957.
[6] 亚洲干眼协会中国分会,海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会眼科学专业委员会眼表与泪液病学组,中国医师协会眼科医师分会眼表与干眼学组.中国干眼专家共识:检查和诊断(2020年)[J].中华眼科杂志,2020,56(10):741-747.
[7] 洪晶.正确开展干眼的临床诊断和治疗工作[J].中华眼科杂志,2019,55(12):881-884.
[8] Landis JR,Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data [J]. Biometrics,1977,33(1):159-174.
[9] 韦振宇,刘含若,梁庆丰.我国干眼流行病学的研究进展[J].中华眼科医学杂志:电子版,2020,10(1):46-50.
[10] Jie Y,Xu L,Wu YY,et al. Prevalence of dry eye among adult Chinese in the Beijing Eye Study[J]. Eye(Lond),2009,23(3):688-693.
[11] Farrand KF,Fridman M,Stillman I?魻,et al. Prevalence of Diagnosed Dry Eye Disease in the United States Among Adults Aged 18 Years and Older [J]. Am J Ophthalmol,2017,182:90-98.
[12] 田玉景,刘焰,邹海东,等.上海市江宁街道20岁及以上人群干眼的流行病学调查[J].中华眼科杂志,2009, 45(6):486-491.
[13] Liu NN,Liu L,Li J,et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye symptom in mainland china:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Ophthalmol,2014,2014:748654.
[14] Rouen PA,White ML. Dry Eye Disease:Prevalence,Assessment,and Management [J]. Home Healthc Now,2018, 36(2):74-83.
[15] 胡道德,顾磊,刘焰,等.干眼症的研究进展[J].眼科新进展,2007,27(5):380-382.
[16] 朱丹,年朝霞,刘洋,等.眼科门诊患者干眼症流行病学调查分析[J].海峡预防医学杂志,2018,24(5):33-35.
[17] 雷雯,季艳丹,赵美云,等.杞菊地黄汤联合西药治疗2型糖尿病干眼症的临床疗效[J].世界中医药,2020,15(19):2955-2958.
[18] 邓洁飞.睑板腺按摩在治疗睑板腺功能障碍型干眼症中的效果[J].中国医药科学,2020,10(10):246-248.
[19] Han SB,Liu YC,Mohamed-Noriega K,et al. Objective Imaging Diagnostics for Dry Eye Disease [J]. J Ophthalmol,2020,2020:3509064.
[20] 周黎纹,谢玉秀,袁非.角膜地形图对干眼症患者泪膜稳定性的评价分析[J].中国临床医学,2019,26(1):69-71.
[21] 梁庆丰,姚卫兰,张阳,等.非侵入性泪膜功能检查在干眼诊断中的初步应用[J].眼科,2014,23(6):375-379.
[22] 陆炯,梁庆丰.角膜共聚焦显微镜检查辅助治疗干眼症的临床研究[J].中华眼科医学杂志:电子版,2016,6(5):213-218.
[23] 孟珠,宋建军,杨柳,等.Lipiview~眼表面干涉仪辅助的中老年人干眼症状与体征的相关性研究[J].眼科新进展,2017,37(2):143-146.
[24] Alonso-Caneiro D,Iskander DR,Collins MJ. Estimating corneal surface topography in videokeratoscopy in the presence of strong signal interference [J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng,2008,55(10):2381-2387.
[25] 杨庆松,王宁利,孙旭光,等.DR-1泪膜干涉成像仪动态成像法诊断干眼症的临床研究[J].眼科,2005,14(3):158-161.
[26] Goto E,Dogru M,Kojima T,et al. Computer-synthesis of an interference color chart of human tear lipid layer,by a colorimetric approach [J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2003,44(11):4693-4697.
[27] López García JS,García Lozano I,Martínez Garchitorena J. Measure of the fatty layer thickness of precorneal tear film by interference colours in different types of dry eye [J]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol,2003,78(5):257-264. |
|
|
|