|
|
Comparison of the effects of two different surgical methods in the treatment of papillary carcinoma of thyroid |
YU Ming1 NA Zhaoyang1 YAN Changhong1 YU Xin2 YAN Jiangtao1 WU Xi1 LI Changbai1 BIAN Hui3 |
1.Department of Surgery, Qinhuangdao Orthopedic Hospital, Hebei Province, Qinhuangdao 066000, China;
2.Department of Aesthetic Medicine, Motherly and Child Care Center of Qinhuangdao, Hebei Province, Qinhuangdao 066000, China;
3.School of Mechanical Engineering, Yanshan University, Hebei Province, Qinhuangdao 066000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To compare and analyze the effect of two different surgical methods in the treatment of papillary carcinoma of thyroid. Methods A total of 84 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent surgical treatment in Qinhuangdao Orthopedic Hospital, Hebei Province from January 2012 to December 2018 were selected as the research subjects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into control group and experimental group, with 42 cases in each group. The control group was treated with traditional multi-functional lateral neck preserving lymphadenectomy, and the experimental group was treated with multi-functional lateral neck preserving lymphadenectomy assisted by endoscopy. The surgical indexes (surgical time, blood loss, length of hospital stay), body stress-related serum indexes (C reactive protein, superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde), incidence of complications, Vancouver scar scale (VSS), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores were compared between the two groups. Results The surgical time of the experimental group was longer than that of the control group, the amount of blood loss, the total incidence of complications, VSS, SAS and SDS scores were lower than those of the control group, and the length of hospital stay of the experimental group was shorter than that of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The levels of C reactive protein and malondialdehyde after surgery were higher than those before surgery, and the level of superoxide dismutase was lower than those before surgery, while the levels of C reactive protein and malondialdehyde in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, and the level of superoxide dismutase in the experimental group was higher than those in the control group, with statistical significance (all P < 0.05). Conclusion The effect of multi-functional lateral neck preserving lymph adenectomy assisted by endoscopy in the treatment of papillary carcinoma of thyroid is ideal, with the advantages of less blood loss, short hospital stay, low incidence of complications, beautiful incision, and can reduce the body stress reaction, anxiety and depression of patients, which is worthy of clinical application.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 梁福美,王荣东.腔镜下经胸-乳入路甲状腺癌根治术与传统开放手术治疗cN0期甲状腺乳头状癌的疗效观察[J].实用医院临床杂志,2019,16(5):98-100.
[2] 陆英慧,刘惠丽,段亚杰.高频超声对甲状腺乳头状癌及颈部淋巴结诊断及手术方式选择的价值[J].实用癌症杂志,2020,35(5):797-800.
[3] 郑桂彬,张国军,马驰,等.经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺手术在甲状腺乳头状癌中的安全效用分析[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2020,34(3):58-63.
[4] 谭玲珍,许志亮,宋俊龙,等.改良Miccoli腔镜辅助颈侧区清扫术与传统开放手术治疗分化型甲状腺癌的疗效对比分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2019,24(4):245-248.
[5] 董良鹏,白宾,郑鹏飞,等.甲状腺乳头状癌的开放手术与经胸-乳入路腔镜手术的比较[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2019,22(3):231-234.
[6] 崔科英,何建苗,邱啸臣,等.甲状腺乳头状癌规范化手术治疗的临床特点分析[J].解放军医学杂志,2019,44(11):70-73.
[7] 陈锦霞.灰阶超声与多普勒超声对甲状腺乳头状癌患者的诊断价值[J].中国药物经济学,2015,10(11):182-183.
[8] 杨立健,黄林,黄鑫.经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺良性结节的疗效及手术切口美观度评价[J].广西医科大学学报,2019,36(9):1510-1513.
[9] 黄有利,曾维霞.围手术期护理干预对甲状腺瘤手术患者疼痛发生率及SAS、SDS的影响评价[J].饮食保健,2019, 6(18):248-249.
[10] 张多钧,雷鸣,张开亮,等.经胸乳入路腔镜与开放甲状腺手术治疗甲状腺恶性肿瘤的临床对比研究[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2018,23(10):757-760.
[11] 刘杰,齐庆安,晋俊平.经胸乳入路腔镜与开放手术治疗甲状腺良恶性结节的临床效果[J].癌症进展,2020, 18(11):1127-1140,1177.
[12] 季双双,龙思丹,田明,等.经胸前入路腔镜手术与传统手术治疗甲状腺癌的疗效及安全性Meta分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2020,25(6):401-406.
[13] 汤苏成,王跃建,陈伟雄.腔镜辅助手术与开放手术治疗T1甲状腺乳头状癌的对比研究[J].黑龙江医学,2019, 43(8):863-865.
[14] 黄凯明,施勇,林忠民,等.乳头状甲状腺癌微创和开放手术的短期及长期疗效对比[J].浙江创伤外科,2019, 24(6):1173-1174.
[15] 邱志刚,刘卫国,张建立,等.完全腔镜下甲状腺乳头状微小癌手术行中央区淋巴结清扫临床研究[J].中国肿瘤外科杂志,2017,9(6):359-361.
[16] 张志斌,赵欣.腔镜辅助侧颈清扫与开放侧颈清扫术在治疗甲状腺乳头状癌颈侧区淋巴结转移中的随机对照研究[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2020,34(9):836-839,843.
[17] 章德广.改良Miccoli腔镜辅助颈侧区清扫术在甲状腺乳头状癌中的运用研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2017.
[18] 章德广,陈剑,何高飞,等.腔镜上纵隔淋巴结清扫术在甲状腺乳头状癌治疗中的运用[J].中国普通外科杂志,2018,27(12):1583-1588.
[19] 王康伟,王永,张浩,等.腔镜辅助改良Miccoli术式在甲状腺癌颈侧区淋巴结清扫中的应用体会[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2019,24(6):401-404.
[20] 胡墨,刘铁军,孙浩.腔镜辅助下甲状腺乳头状癌根治术的临床应用[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2018,21(8):632-634.
[21] 王宇,嵇庆海,李崔伟,等.腔镜辅助手术与开放手术治疗cN0期甲状腺乳头状癌的对比[J].中国肿瘤临床,2019, 46(20):1051-1055.
[22] 王野驰.腔镜辅助下多功能保留侧颈淋巴结清扫术与传统多功能保留侧颈淋巴结清扫术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的临床疗效比较分析[D].长春:吉林大学,2020.
[23] 赵明,王可敬,谭卓,等.腔镜甲状腺手术与开放手术在单侧甲状腺良性病变患者治疗中的机体应激反应对比[J].浙江创伤外科,2018,23(1):76-77.
[24] 屈春梅,李颖,陈书梅.补硒治疗对HT患者甲状腺功能、免疫应答及氧化应激的影响[J].海南医学院学报,2019,25(5):367-370.
[25] 刘利,任泽强,张蓬波,等.腔镜辅助下甲状腺乳头状癌根治术的临床效果分析[J].中华普外科手术学杂志,2017, 11(4):345-347. |
|
|
|