|
|
Establishment of the input-output evaluation system of the scientific research fund of the tertiary hospital |
SHI Han1 GAO Yuan1 JIAO Jingxuan1 LIU Sihan2 ZHAO Haiyu3 |
1.Office of Academic Research, Aerospace Center Hospital Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing 100049, China;
2.Evaluation Division, Aerospace Center Hospital Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing 100049, China;
3.Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To construct the input-output evaluation index system of scientific research funds for tertiary general hospitals, and lay the foundation for the hospitals to carry out scientific research fund evaluation. Methods From January to June 2020, this research conducted 3 rounds of questionnaire consultation with 29 experts from universities, research institutes, and public hospitals of tertiary level and above. The Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine scientific research evaluation indicators and weight coefficients, and the hospital scientific research fund input-output evaluation indicator system was established. Results The effective recovery rates of the three rounds of questionnaires were all > 80%, and the experts were highly motivated; the authority coefficients of the experts on the evaluation indicators were all > 0.7, and the consultation results were credible; the Kendall’s W coordination coefficients of the indicators at all levels were 0.300-0.776, and the coordination degree of the experts was relatively high. Finally, 2 first-level indicators, 9 second-level indicators, and 23 third-level indicators were established. Conclusion The evaluation index system for scientific research funds constructed with scientific research input and output models is scientific and reliable, and can provide reference for similar hospitals to carry out related work.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 袁媛,马琳,刘晓云,等.高校附属医院科研绩效评价指标体系研究[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2018,38(5):580-582.
[2] 刘力,黄创霞.基于AHP方法的高校科研经费绩效评价指标构建研究[J].财务与金融,2018(5):52-56,60.
[3] 高小强,陈玮,张召冉.基于专家群决策的AHP在PPP项目风险管理中的应用[J].施工技术,2018,47(S1):968-971.
[4] 袁媛,程平,刘晓云,等.高校附院科研绩效评价指标体系的构建与应用效果[J].安徽卫生职业技术学院学报,2018,17(4):6-7,15.
[5] 冀永强.层次分析法(AHP)权重向量计算及其应用分析[J].中国市场,2015(52):47-49.
[6] 胡强,朱建民,葛春林,等.二级甲等综合性医院科研评价指标体系构建的初步研究[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,2012(4):240-243.
[7] 赵洋,李晖,翁振群.新疆某三甲医院科研投入产出评价指标体系建立的研究[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,2016, 29(2):99-103.
[8] 门韵,丁凡,王健生,等.某三级综合医院个人业绩评价指标体系的构建与应用[J].现代医院管理,2020,18(2):53-56.
[9] 叶强,张从昕.某综合性三甲医院临床医师科研成果指标体系构建[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2016,23(6):543-546.
[10] 刘蕊,李济宇,李艳红,等.基于组合赋权法的公立医院内部学科评估模型构建与实证研究[J].中国医院管理,2019,39(10):15-18.
[11] 李艾丹,李春梅,杨思维.科研人员信用评价指标体系研究[J].中国科技论坛,2017(12):123-130.
[12] 戴菲菲,刘鹏,陈飞.基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建住院医师规范化培训核心人文素养评估体系[J].中国医学伦理学,2018,31(10):1344-1348.
[13] 刘娟,唐琨,胡佩武,等.基于科研绩效考核建立高校附属医院学科分层管理模式[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,2020,33(3):198-202.
[14] 陆毅,黄慧哲,李小平.综合医院科研绩效评估与奖金分配体系的探索与构建[J].现代医院,2019,19(11):1591-1593,1597.
[15] 杨帆,魏敦宏,杨凌虹,等.浅析医院科研绩效评价指标体系的构建与应用效果研究[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019(91):7-8.
[16] 李奕璋,郑建,刘玉兰.基于数据包络分析的医院综合绩效改革效果研究[J].中国卫生统计,2017,34(6):961-963.
[17] 黄明杰,魏玉萍,吴晔,等.医院科研绩效评估系统的构建与应用[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,2013(4):277-280.
[18] 张会方,苗苗,于玲玲,等.关于某三甲医院科研激励工作满意度调查[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,2018,31(2):123-127.
[19] 冯宝华,秦鹏,张鹏俊,等.某综合医院科研绩效评价指标体系的实践与思考[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,2017, 30(2):107-110.
[20] 张卫国,柴瑜,曹万立.公益类科研院所科技创新能力评价实证研究[J].重庆大学学报:社会科学版,2012,18(1):77-82.
[21] 冯宝华,孟苓云,张鹏俊,等.综合医院附属研究所绩效评价指标体系应用研究[J].中国医院,2016,20(3):58-60.
[22] 崔春舜,徐畅,刘雅茹,等.基于数据包络分析的公益性卫生行业科研专项绩效评价[J].中国医药导报,2020, 17(13):173-176.
[23] 楚尧娟,尹钊,梁艳,等.利用Delphi法和层次分析法构建医院药师核心能力的指标体系[J].中国医院药学杂志,2019,39(11):1198-1202.
[24] 张惠源.基于AHP的群决策排名问题[J].数学的实践与认识,2017,47(12):21-37.
[25] 刘蕴,张维.建筑工程项目投标决策风险评估[J].中国西部科技,2014,13(3):85-86.
[26] 吴宾,李媛,王丹蕾,等.基于DEA模型的医院创新型科研团队绩效评估研究[J].医院管理论坛,2019,36(7):26-29. |
|
|
|