|
|
Effect of coronary microcirculation resistance on left ventricular remodeling after STEMI intervention |
CHEN Ze LI Jiawei▲ |
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Suzhou Jiulong Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Jiangsu Province, Suzhou 215000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of coronary index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) on left ventricular remodeling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) intervention. Methods A total of 83 STEMI patients admitted to Suzhou Jiulong Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from July 2018 to December 2019 were enrolled and all underwent direct percutaneous coronary stent implantation (PCI) after admission. IMR after PCI treatment was measured intraoperatively, and the patients were divided into high IMR group (38 cases, IMR≥25 U) and normal IMR group (45 cases, IMR<25 U). All patients were routinely followed up with color ultrasound six months after surgery, and the changes of heart function and the condition of left ventricular remodeling were compared between the two groups, and the relationship between IMR and left ventricular remodeling and its predictive value were evaluated. Results Compared with the hospital, six months after surgery, LVEF was decreased and LVEDV was increased in the high IMR group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Six months after surgery, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of the high IMR group was lower than that of the normal IMR group, and the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and the incidence of left ventricular remodeling were higher than that of the normal IMR group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that IMR was negatively correlated with LVEF (r = -0.357) and positively correlated with LVEDV (r = 0.608) (all P < 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that IMR was an risk factor for left ventricular remodeling after intervention in patients with STEMI (OR = 1.87, 95%CI: 1.07-3.25, P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that the area under curve of IMR predicting left ventricular remodeling six months after intervention in STEMI patients was 0.84 (95%CI: 0.76-0.93), the best diagnostic threshold was 32.64 U, and the sensitivity and specificity were 69% and 78%, respectively. Conclusion IMR affects cardiac function and left ventricular volume after STEMI intervention, and is an risk factor for left ventricular remodeling in STEMI.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 马欢,冯月,刘有军,等.不同狭窄程度下冠状动脉微循环阻力对心肌缺血的诊断价值[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2020,19(9):943-947.
[2] 熊小英,杨人强. 冠脉微循环阻力指数对冠脉微循环评价的现状[J].广东医学,2017,38(22):3537-3539.
[3] 吴彩凤,徐日新,张强,等.微循环阻力指数评估急性前壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者急诊冠状动脉介入治疗预后的价值及相关影响因素[J].实用临床医药杂志,2019, 23(16):65-75.
[4] 沈冲,王乐.联合血栓抽吸在ST段抬高型心梗死患者急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中应用的效果[J].中华心血管病杂志,2019,47(1):49-55.
[5] Fearon WF,Low AF,Yong AS,et al. Prognostic value of the index of microcirculatory resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. Circulation,2013,127(24):2436-2441.
[6] 王世祥,许卫,陈唏明,等.冠状动脉微循环阻力指数预测STEMI患者PCI治疗后1年内住院率的临床价值[J].岭南心血管病杂志,2017,23(2):142-146.
[7] 周健伟,张晶,何胜虎.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中微循环阻力指数相关性的研究进展[J].中国基层医药,2020,27(15):1917-1920.
[8] 中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2015,43(5):380-393.
[9] 李萌玫,邵一兵,张纯,等.全不同侧支循环患者冠状动脉完全闭塞病变择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后冠状动脉微循环的差异及近期预后的比较[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2016,24(12):672-675.
[10] 岑锦明,杨希立,郭军,等.冠状动脉微循环阻力指数与传统心血管危险因素、Hcy及LP-PLA2的相关性研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2018,28(33):64-70.
[11] 刘兴邦,何立芸,曹轲,等.非心肌梗死冠心病患者的心肌微循环阻力指数及相关因素分析[J].中国循环杂志,2018,33(7):637-641.
[12] Zile MR,Mehurg SM,Arroyo JE,et al. Relationship between the temporal profile of plasma microRNA and left ventricular remodeling in patients after myocardial infarction [J]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet,2011,4(6):614-619.
[13] 肖福龙,宫丽鸿.冠状动脉微循环障碍研究进展[J].吉林中医药,2019,39(12):1683-1685.
[14] Tsutsui M,Ohya Y,Sugahara K. Latest evidence in endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor research [J]. Circ J,2012,76(7):1599-1600.
[15] 肖文颖,黄红漫,冯六六.冠状动脉微循环功能障碍研究新进展[J].心血管康复医学杂志,2019,28(2):247-251.
[16] 官兵,苏杨,韦旭斌,等.尼可地尔对梗阻性冠心病患者冠状动脉微循环障碍的影响[J].昆明医科大学学报,2020, 40(1):68-75.
[17] Choi BJ,Prasad A,Gulati R,et al. Coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with early coronary artery disease is associated with the increase in intravascular lipid core plaque [J]. Eur Heart J,2013,34(27):2047-2054.
[18] 彭琨,陈卫强,李剑明.冠状动脉血流储备分数、心肌血流储备和微循环阻力指数在冠心病患者中的临床应用价值[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2019,43(5):462-467.
[19] 段天兵,向定成.急性心肌梗死后冠状动脉微循环障碍发生机制和诊治方法的研究进展[J].中国循环杂志,2019, 34(7):722-725.
[20] 单锐婷,聂伟,张文琪.冠状动脉微循环障碍研究现状[J].中国实用内科杂志,2017,37(12):1106-1110.
[21] 刘磊,姚道阔,陈晖.冠状动脉微循环障碍发病机制研究进展[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2020,12(1):126-128.
[22] 张冬花,张京梅.冠状动脉微血管疾病研究进展[J].中国医药,2019,14(7):1104-1107.
[23] 于子凯,付长庚,吴永健,等.冠状动脉微血管疾病的中西医结合研究进展[J].西部中医药,2019,32(5):135-138.
[24] 张宁,陈婧,宋亚楠,等.心肌梗死后促进冠状动脉微循环血管再生的研究进展[J].中华心血管病杂志,2018, 46(10):828-830.
[25] 李亚然,姜云发,支伟,等.急性冠状动脉综合征血运重建后微循环阻力指数相关因素分析[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2020,28(4):192-198.
[26] Jablonski KL,Chonchol M,Pierce GL,et al. 25-hydroxyvitarnin D deficiency is associated with inflammation-linked vascular endothelial dysfunction in middle-aged and older adults [J]. Hypertension,2011,57(1):63-69.
[27] Tsugawa N. Cardiovascular diseases and fat soluble vitamins:vitamin D and vitamin K [J]. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol(Tokyo),2015,61 Suppl:S170-S172. |
|
|
|