|
|
Application of ultrasound localization in intraspinal anesthesia for severe obesity parturients |
HAN Bin XU Mingjun BAI Yunbo |
Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100006, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To evaluate the application of ultrasonographic assisted positioning technique in intraspinal anesthesia of severe obesity parturients. Methods Eighty severe obesity parturients who underwent cesarean section and combined lumbar epidural anesthesia in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from July 2019 to January 2020 were selected as research subjects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into the ultrasound group (40 cases) and the control group (40 cases), of which 5 cases were converted to general anesthesia and withdrew from the study. The ultrasound group was used to ultrasound-assisted intraspinal anesthesia; the control group was performed by using the body surface marker localization method. The puncture conditions such as puncture time, puncture frequency and needle insertion depth of the two groups were compared, and the incidence of complications in the two groups were observed. Result The puncture time in the ultrasound group was shorter than that in the control group, puncture frequency was lower than that in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in needle insertion depth between the two groups (P > 0.05). No postoperative urinary retention and lower limb movement disorders were observed in both groups. The incidence of postoperative low back pain in the ultrasound group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of paraesthesia and lower limb sensory disturbance between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion In obesity parturients, ultrasound-assisted intraspinal anesthesia can significantly improve the success rate of puncture, shorten the puncture time, and has obvious advantages compared with traditional body surface marker localization method.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Ameri G,Rankin A,Baxter JSH,et al. Development and Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Ultrasound Guidance System for Spinal Anesthesia:Preliminary Results [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol,2019,45(10):2736-2746.
[2] 董慧,王云,利雪阳,等.超声脊柱旁正中短轴扫描引导平面内腰段椎管内穿刺的效果:与脊柱旁正中长轴扫描的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2018,38(4):474-476.
[3] 陈三冬,赵梨园,贾英萍,等.超声引导经骶管硬膜外阻滞用于全麻幼儿肺叶切除术后镇痛的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2019,39(9):1092-1094.
[4] Perlas A,Chaparro LE,Chin KJ. Lumbar Neuraxial Ultrasound for Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2016,41(2):251-260.
[5] 范艳婷,吴贵云,白雪,等.右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因腹横平面阻滞对小儿腹腔镜隐睾固定术术后镇痛效果的影响[J].中国医药导报,2019,16(22):103-106,114.
[6] 牟俊英,刘涛,叶刚,等.超声引导腰方肌阻滞联合全身麻醉对老年结直肠癌患者术后早期认知功能及应激的影响[J].中国医药导报,2020,17(7):106-110.
[7] Kallidaikurichi Srinivasan K,Iohom G,Loughnane F,et al. Conventional landmark-guided midline versus preprocedure ultrasound-guided paramedian techniques in spinal anesthesia [J]. Anesth Analg,2015,121(4):1089-1196.
[8] Perlas A,Chaparro LE,Chin KJ. Lumbar neuraxial ultrasound for spinal and epidural anesthesia:a systematic review and metaanalysis [J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2016,41(2):251-260.
[9] 郭飞鹤,胡春华.手持式超声仪在分娩镇痛中估测硬膜外深度及穿刺定位的准确性[J].南昌大学学报:医学版,2020,60(1):36-40.
[10] 朱利君,俞玉龙,王饪,等.超声引导下腹直肌后鞘阻滞联合腹横肌阻滞对开腹结直肠癌术患者应激反应的影响[J].中华全科医学,2019,17(9):1515-1517.
[11] Kenevan MR,Smith HM,Olsen DA,et al. Ultrasound-Assisted Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in a Parturient With Currarino Triad:A Case Report [J]. A A Pract,2019,12(11):393-395.
[12] 费昱达,崔旭蕾.超声引导下老年患者硬膜外穿刺二例[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2018,34(1):98-99.
[13] Tawfik MM,Atallah MM,Elkharboutly WS,et al. Does preprocedural ultrasound increase the first-pass success rate of epidural catheterization before cesarean delivery? A randomized controlled trial [J]. Anesth Analg,2017, 124(3):851-856.
[14] Pesteie M,Lessoway V,Abolmaesumi P,et al. Automatic Localization of the Needle Target for Ultrasound-Guided Epidural Injections [J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging,2018, 37(1):81-92.
[15] 杜真,屈双权,张溪英,等.全麻联合超声引导硬膜外阻滞用于婴儿腹腔镜手术的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2018, 38(2):173-176.
[16] 何才,俞瑾,李有长,等.硬膜外阻滞联合超声引导下阴部神经阻滞分娩镇痛的效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2019, 35(4):340-343.
[17] Ponde VC,Bedekar VV,Desai AP,et al. Does ultrasound guidance add accuracy to continuous caudal-epidural catheter placements in neonates and infants? [J]. Paediatr Anaesth,2017,27(10):1010-1014.
[18] Elsharkawy H,Saasouh W,Babazade R,et al. Real-time Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Epidural with Transverse Interlaminar View:Evaluation of an In-Plane Technique [J]. Pain Med,2019,20(9):1750-1755.
[19] 程龙,周雁,许莉,等.超声引导下胸椎旁阻滞联合蛛网膜下隙阻滞在经皮肾镜碎石术中的应用[J].中国临床医生杂志,2018,46(7):836-838.
[20] Wiegele M,Marhofer P,L?觟nnqvist PA. Caudal epidural blocks in paediatric patients:a review and practical considerations [J]. Br J Anaesth,2019,122(4):509-517.
[21] 邱柳基,陈裕强,徐瑶,等.超声引导胸椎旁神经阻滞对自控静脉镇痛质量的影响[J].中国当代医药,2019,26(22):8-14.
[22] Chin A,Crooke B,Heywood L,et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing needle movements during combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia with and without ultrasound assistance [J]. Anaesthesia,2018,73(4):466-473.
[23] 刘家鹏,卓娜,韩建阁.超声引导胸椎旁神经阻滞在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中应用的临床观察研究[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2020,26(2):249-253.
[24] 胡静,丁毅,史斌.超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞在胸腔镜肺叶切除术围术期快速康复中的应用[J].广东医学,2019,40(4):544-548.
[25] 曾华北,夏春华.超声引导下旁正中入路硬膜外分娩镇痛的临床效果[J].江苏医药,2019,45(5):523-524.
[26] 郭敏,王云,王雷,等.改良超声引导椎管内穿刺技术用于脊柱结构异常患者的麻醉1例[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2019,40(10):955-957. |
|
|
|