|
|
|
| Influence of “pregnant school+WeChat official account” on fear of childbirth and delivery mode of primipara |
| WANG Chuanrui DAI Jiang |
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Hebei Province, Zhangjiakou 075000, China |
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the effect of “pregnant school+WeChat official account” on the fear of childbirth and delivery mode in primipara. Methods From January 2019 to June 2019, 200 primiparas in the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into control group and observation group by digital random method, 100 cases in each group, all primiparas received relevant knowledge of pregnancy and childbirth health care. The control group was given routine outpatient education, while the observation group was filing with the system of “pregnant school+WeChat official account” to carry out a comprehensive and systematic health education in pregnancy. The methods of delivery and the time of delivery were compared between the two groups; the anxiety of the two groups were evaluated by anxiety self-rating scale (SAS); the knowledge of the two groups were analyzed and summarized by questionnaire. Results The natural delivery rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P ＜ 0.05). The time of each birth process of primipara in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). The midwifery rate of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). The cesarean section rate in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). The SAS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the incidence of anxiety in the observation group was lower than that of the control group, with statistical significance (P ＜ 0.05). In the observation group, the knowledge of pregnancy, childbirth, puerperium and neonatal nursing were higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). Conclusion The mode of “pregnant school+WeChat official account” can improve the natural childbirth rate of primiparas and reduce the rate of cesarean section. Therefore, the model of pregnant school+WeChat official account is worthy of clinical reference and has the value of clinical promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 万立新，苑晶惠，邴佳，等.吉林省孕产妇母婴健康素养影响因素调查分析[J].中国妇幼保健，2020，35（3）：529-532.
[2] 党慧娟.分娩前宣教联合孕产期一体化管理对孕产妇分娩方式及哺乳方式的影响[J].河南医学研究，2018，27（16）：3056-3058.
[3] Dekel S，Ein-Dor T，Berman Z，et al. Delivery mode is associated with maternal mental health following childbirth [J]. Archives of Women’s Mental Health，2019，22（6）：817-824.
[4] 袁春蕾，刘燕群，刘光华，等.集中群组孕期健康教育对孕妇分娩恐惧的干预效果[J].护理学杂志，2017，32（18）：27-29.
[5] 高国芳.育龄期初产妇分娩恐惧状况及其影响因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健，2020，35（3）：541-543.
[6] 陆勇芳，黄继梅.浅谈孕妇学校对于自然分娩的作用[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志，2019，6（24）：37-39.
[7] 夏红兵.基于翻转课堂实施孕妇学校教学在初产妇中的应用[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志，2020，5（5）：189-193.
[8] 余梦婷，王乐园，刁冠伟，等.分娩恐惧及孕期教育干预进展[J].中国妇幼保健，2016，31（22）：4908-4910.
[9] 孙玉，周利华，李玉红.基于计划行为理论探讨初产妇对配偶参与分娩的行为意向及影响因素[J].中国医刊，2020， 55（2）：223-226.
[10] 时惠霞，丁亚艳，李晓敏.院内孕妇学校精品课辅导对孕妇及新生儿的影响[J].国际护理学杂志，2017，36（11）：1474-1477.
[11] 高敏.新产程管理对分娩镇痛及降低剖宫产率的影响[J].中国继续医学教育，2020，12（3）：84-86.
[12] 宫小飞，朴颖实，刘影.公立医院应用微信公众号开展医学科普新模式的实践与探索[J].中国医药导报，2020， 17（2）：189-192.
[13] 米丽邦古丽·吾布里，马瑛，丁桂凤.自由体位分娩联合自然娩肩法对妊娠结局和产妇产后恢复的影响[J].中国医药导报，2018，15（29）：66-69，78.
[14] 陈蓉，梅花.助产护理干预对高龄产妇分娩方式及产程的影响[J].中国农村卫生，2020，12（2）：55.
[15] 邱良玉，许明军，丁武华，等.产科护理新模式对促进自然分娩，降低剖宫产率的影响[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志，2020，5（5）：129.
[16] 吴贞红，刘欢，冯亚玲.孕妇分娩恐惧与家庭关怀度和心理弹性的相关性研究[J].沈阳医学院学报，2020，22（1）：59-62.
[17] 张羽，刘艳凤，彭政，等.导乐陪伴分娩对降低剖宫产率及其他分娩结局的影响[J].中国生育健康杂志，2020， 31（1）：10-14.
[18] 王萍，刘小平，钱雪英，等.导乐分娩对分娩过程及妊娠结局影响的研究[J].中国妇幼保健，2000，15（9）：555-556.
[19] 唐勤熔.孕期营养保健指导在围生期孕妇中的应用效果探讨[J].中国实用医药，2019，14（22）：163-164.
[20] 吴玮.产程体位指导干预对胎位不正产妇分娩方式的影响[J].当代医学，2020，558（7）：82-83.
[21] 聂慧.计划分娩对孕产妇阴道顺产率，产程及分娩结局的影响[J].中国医药科学，2020，10（6）：94-96，142.
[22] 夏欢欢，何燕玲.孕产妇焦虑和抑郁的危险因素及干预对策[J].中国医药导报，2018，15（31）：56-59.
[23] 杨丽君，陈朝霞，肖会能.持续质量改进对妊娠期高血压孕产妇血压控制及母婴结局的护理干预研究[J].成都医学院学报，2019，65（4）：86-89.
[24] 谢昆，黄洋，陈慧芳.探讨导乐陪伴分娩护理模式对产妇分娩结局及产后出血的影响[J].当代医学，2020，560（9）：193-194.
[25] 肖金凤，喻凌云.新产程标准管理下导乐对产程及母婴预后的影响[J].中国现代医生，2020，58（8）：62-64. |
|
|
|
