|
|
Meta analysis of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of 2-3 cm renal calculi |
LI Jinze PENG Lei WEI Tangqiang XIA Zhongyou LI Yunxiang |
Department of Urology, the Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Sichuan Province, Nanchong 637000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in kidney stones of 2-3 cm. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Science, WanFang, VIP and CNKI databases were electronically searched to identify all eligible comparative studies from inception of the database to October 2019. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 10 studies involving 1597 patients were included. Among them, there were 778 patients in the RIRS group and 819 patients in the PCNL group. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with PCNL, RIRS had lower stone-free rate (OR = 0.47, 95%CI [0.34, 0.66], P < 0.000 01), shorter hospital stay (MD = -2.45, 95%CI[-2.96, -1.94], P < 0.000 01), less decrease in haemoglobin (MD = -6.43, 95%CI[-9.05, -3.82], P < 0.000 01), and lower complication rate (OR = 0.69, 95%CI [0.51, 0.93], P = 0.02), but no difference was found in operation time between the two groups (MD = 6.27, 95%CI[-3.51, 16.05], P = 0.21). Conclusion Compared with PCNL, RIRS has a lower SFR, but it has advantages in terms of hospital stay, decrease in haemoglobin, and complication rate. Therefore, for patients with kidney stones of 2-3 cm, RIRS is a safe and effective alternative to PCNL.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Lotan Y,Buendia Jimenez I,Lenoir-Wijnkoop I,et al. Primary prevention of nephrolithiasis is cost-effective for a national healthcare system [J]. BJU Int,2012,110(11 Pt C):E1060-E1067.
[2] Sorokin I,Mamoulakis C,Miyazawa K,et al. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world [J]. World J Urol,2017, 35(9):1301-1320.
[3] Assimos D,Krambeck A,Miller NL,et al. Surgical Management of Stones:American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline,PART I [J]. J Urol,2016, 196(4):1153-1160.
[4] Turk C,Petrik A,Sarica K,et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis [J]. Eur Urol,2016, 69(3):475-482.
[5] Wollin DA,Preminger GM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy:complications and how to deal with them [J]. Urolithiasis,2018,46(1):87-97.
[6] Desai J,Solanki R. Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy(UMP):one more armamentarium [J]. BJU Int,2013, 112(7):1046-1049.
[7] Hennessey DB,Kinnear NK,Troy A,et al. Mini PCNL for renal calculi:does size matter? [J]. BJU Int,2017,119 Suppl 5:39-46.
[8] Grasso M,Ficazzola M. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi [J]. J Urol,1999,162(6):1904-1908.
[9] Riley JM,Stearman L,Troxel S. Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm [J]. J Endourol,2009,23(9):1395-1398.
[10] Hyams ES,Munver R,Bird VG,et al. Flexible ureteror- enoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm:a multi-institutional experience [J]. J Endourol,2010,24(10):1583-1588.
[11] Skolarikos A,Gross AJ,Krebs A,et al. Outcomes of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Solitary Renal Stones in the CROES URS Global Study [J]. J Urol,2015,194(1):137-143.
[12] Pan J,Chen Q,Xue W,et al. RIRS versus mPCNL for single renal stone of 2-3 cm:clinical outcome and cost-effective analysis in Chinese medical setting [J]. Urolithiasis,2013,41(1):73-78.
[13] Pieras E,Tubau V,Brugarolas X,et al. Comparative analysis between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy in kidney stones of 2-3 cm [J]. Actas Urol Esp,2017,41(3):194-199.
[14] Chen HQ,Chen ZY,Zeng F,et al. Comparative study of the treatment of 20-30 mm renal stones with miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureter-orenoscopy in obese patients [J]. World J Urol,2018,36(8):1309-1314.
[15] Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:the PRISMA statement [J]. BMJ,2009,339:b2535.
[16] Clark HD,Wells GA,Huet C,et al. Assessing the quality of randomized trials:reliability of the Jadad scale [J]. Control Clin Trials,1999,20(5):448-452.
[17] Wells GA,Shea B,O’Connell D. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS)for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Web site. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
[18] Wan X,Wang W,Liu J,et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size,median,range and/or interquartile range [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2014,14:135.
[19] 刘杰,白大应,石磊,等.输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜治疗2~3 cm肾结石的对照研究[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志:电子版,2018,12(6):375-379.
[20] 梁福律,范先明,郭昭建,等.输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗2~2.5 cm肾下盏结石疗效对比[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2015,20(7):489-492.
[21] Zengin K,Tanik S,Karakoyunlu N,et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous lithotripsy to treat renal stones 2-3 cm in diameter [J]. Biomed Res Int,2015,2015:914231.
[22] Sari S,Ozok HU,Cakici MC,et al. A Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Management of Renal Stones ?2 CM [J]. Urol J,2017,14(1):2949-2954.
[23] Zhang Y,Wu Y,Li J,et al. Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Lower Calyceal Calculi of 2-3 cm in Patients With Solitary Kidney [J]. Urology,2018,115:65-70.
[24] 李淦洪,李乾伟,杨俊,等.微创经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜处理直径2~3 cm肾结石的疗效及安全性分析[J].中国临床新医学,2019,12(5):545-549.
[25] Zhao Z,Sun H,Zeng T,et al. An easy risk stratification to recommend the optimal patients with 2-3 cm kidney stones to receive retrograde intrarenal surgery or mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Urolithiasis,2020,48(2):167-173.
[26] Palmero JL,Castello A,Miralles J,et al. Results of retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones greater than 2 cm [J]. Actas Urol Esp,2014,38(4):257-262.
[27] Kim TJ,Lee IJ,Lee JK,et al. Analysis of factors affecting re-admission after retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone [J]. World J Urol,2019,37(6):1205-1210.
[28] Inoue T,Murota T,Okada S,et al. Influence of Pelvicaliceal Anatomy on Stone Clearance After Flexible Ureteroscopy and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Large Renal Stones [J]. J Endourol,2015,29(9):998-1005.
[29] Sabnis RB,Jagtap J,Mishra S,et al. Treating renal calculi 1-2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery:a prospective comparative study [J]. BJU Int,2012,110(8 Pt B):E346-E349. |
|
|
|