|
|
Analysis of recognition of the mixed teaching of basic medicine in general and key medical colleges |
LIU Jia1 LI Na2 WANG Xiulan3 ZHANG Yong4 |
1.School of Basic Medicine, Changsha Medical University, Hu′nan Province Changsha 410219, China;
2.Department of Basic Medicine, Xiamen Medical College, Fujian Province, Xiamen 361023, China;
3.Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Hu′nan Province, Changsha 410078, China;
4.School of Basic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510515, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To analyze the recognition degree of the mixed teaching of basic medicine among undergraduates of general and key medical colleges, and to provide suggestions for further improving the mixed teaching effect of different colleges, especially general medical colleges. Methods From January to June 2019, 250 students were selected of the first and second-year undergraduates of clinical medicine from two general medical schools and two key medical schools, Changsha Medical College (160 students), Xiamen Medical College (130 students), Xiangya Medical College of Central South University (130 students) and Southern Medical University (100 students), they were investigated by questionnaires to find out their attitudes and suggestions on adopting mixed teaching in basic courses. Results A total of 481 valid questionnaires were received (including 273 students from general medical universities and 208 students from key medical universities), and 93.56% of the students thought that mixed teaching had been successful. The number of people who thought it was necessary to carry out mixed teaching in general medical colleges was less than that in key medical colleges. In general medical colleges, the number of people who thought it was need to reform the mixed teaching of basic courses was more than that of key medical colleges. The survey showed that the satisfaction degree of mixed teaching in general medical colleges was lower than that in key medical colleges. The existing problems and improvement suggestions in the mixed teaching proposed by students. In the general medical colleges, the top three items from high to low promotion frequency were: strengthening the assessment of process, more diversified types of mixed teaching, unreasonable arrangement. In the key medical colleges from high to low frequency, the top three items were: the content should be more perfect and standard, the mixed teaching content was not consistent with the professional direction, and the arrangement was unreasonable. Conclusion Harvest feeling are higher to the teaching of basic medical courses of the general medical colleges than key medical medical colleges. Student′s identity in mixed teaching of basic medicine of the general medical colleges far less than the key medical colleges. There are still many aspects to be improved in mixed teaching by way of study groups.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Stockwell BR,Stockwell MS,Cennamo M,et al. Blended Learning Improves Science Education [J]. Cell. 2015,162(5):933-936.
[2] Kuhn S,Frankenhauser S,Tolks D. Digital learning and teaching in medical education:Already there or still at the beginning? [J]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforsc-hung Gesundheitsschutz,2018,61(2):201-209.
[3] Memon AR,Rathore FA. Moodle and Online Learning in Pakistani Medical Universities:An opportunity worth exploring in higher education and research [J]. J Pak Med Assoc,2018,68(7):1076-1078.
[4] Linda S,Kenneth B,Lars LL,et al. The challenges of military medical education and training for physicians and nurses in the Nordic countries-an interview study [J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med,2017,25(1):38.
[5] Milic NM,Trajkovic GZ,Bukumiric ZM,et al. Improving Education in Medical Statistics:Implementing a Blended Learning Model in the Existing Curriculum [J]. PLoS One,2016,11(2):e0148882.
[6] Liu Q,Peng W,Zhang F,et al. The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J]. J Med Internet Res,2016,18(1):e2.
[7] MacQueen IT,Kirchhoff P,Chen DC. Blended Learning Methods for Surgical Education [J]. Surg Technol Int,2018,11(33):127-132.
[8] Tarpada SP,Hsueh WD,Gibber MJ. Resident and student education in otolaryngology:A 10-year update on e-learning [J]. Laryngoscope,2017,127(7):E219-E224.
[9] 张坤,闫宏宇,梁果,等.适合混合式学习模式的教学视频资源库的设计[J].基础医学与临床,2019,39(8):1217-1220.
[10] 韩硕,金元哲,段志英,等.微信支持的混合式教学在心内科教学中的应用[J].中国继续医学教育,2019,11(36):36-39.
[11] Heptonstall NB,Ali T,Mankad K. Integrating Radiology and Anatomy Teaching in Medical Education in the UK--The Evidence,Current Trends,and Future Scope [J]. Acad Radiol,2016,23(4):521-526.
[12] Hassall C,Lewis DI. Institutional and technological barriers to the use of open educational resources(OERs)in physiology and medical education [J]. Adv Physiol Educ,2017,41(1):77-81.
[13] 汪坤菊,易西南,张显芳,等.基于蓝墨云班课平台,构建局部解剖学混合式教学模式[J].解剖学杂志,2019, 42(3):330-332.
[14] 刘焕,王爽,郭玉芳,等.基于雨课堂的混合式教学在病理生理学教学中的应用[J].中国医药导报,2019,16(31):60-63.
[15] Luo L,Cheng X,Wang S,et al. Blended learning with Moodle in medical statistics: an assessment of knowledge,attitudes and practices relating to e-learning [J]. BMC Med Educ,2017,17(1):170.
[16] Hess R,Hagemeier NE,Blackwelder R,et al. Teaching Communication Skills to Medical and Pharmacy Students Through a Blended Learning Course [J]. Am J Pharm Educ,2016,80(4):64.
[17] Morton CE,Saleh SN,Smith SF,et al. Blended learning:how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement? [J]. BMC Med Educ,2016,4(16):195.
[18] Pickering JD,Henningsohn L,DeRuiter MC,et al. Twelve tips for developing and delivering a massive open online course in medical education [J]. Med Teach,2017,39(7):691-696.
[19] 甘容辉.高校混合式教学法存在的问题及改进措施[J].黑龙江高教研究,2016,(7):174-176.
[20] Houssein S,Di ML,Schwebel C,et al. Consequences of Switching to Blended Learning:The Grenoble Medical School Key Elements [J]. Stud Health Technol Inform,2018,247:356-360.
[21] Emily G,Julia L,Adam O,et al. Learning Together:Integration of Advanced Practice Providers into a General Medicine Ward Team [J]. J Gen Intern Med,2019,34 (5):769-772.
[22] 邹洁雅,王常安,杨庄青.自发式学习小组在医学教育中的应用探讨[J].继续医学教育,2019,33(11):46-47. |
|
|
|