|
|
Effect of Chaihu Pingwei Powder on the prevention and treatment of cancer-related fatigue caused by chemotherapy |
JIANG Jingwen1 ZHANG Hui1 ZHU Fengting1 LIN Lizhu2 CHEN Xuewu1 |
1.Department of Oncology, Hainan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hainan Province, Haikou 570203, China;
2.Cancer Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510405, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To observe the clinical effect of Chaihu Pingwei Powder on the prevention and treatment of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) caused by chemotherapy. Methods A total of 60 hospitalized patients receiving chemotherapy admitted to the Department of Oncology, Hainan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2017 to December 2018 were selected. According to the random number table method, they were divided into the Chaihu Pingwei Powder group and the conventional group, with 30 patients in each group. The conventional group received the best symptomatic and supportive treatment, while the Chaihu Pingwei Powder group was given oral administration of Chaihu Pingwei Powder on the first day after chemotherapy based on the symptomatic and supportive treatment of the conventional group, and was taken orally for seven days consecutively. The changes of fatigue, quality of life score, bone marrow suppression, gastrointestinal reaction, nutritional status and immune function were observed before and after treatment in the two groups. Results Before treatment, there was no significant difference in CRF scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). After one week of treatment, CRF score of Chaihu Pingwei Powder group was not significantly different from that before treatment (P > 0.05). The emotional and cognitive scores of the conventional group showed no statistically significant difference from those before treatment (P > 0.05), behavioral and sensory scores of the conventional group increased compared with those before treatment, with statistically significant differences (all P < 0.05). After one week of treatment, the behavioral and sensory scores of Chaihu Pingwei Powder group were lower than those of the conventional group, with statistically significant differences (all P < 0.05), while the emotional and cognitive scores were not significantly different from those of the conventional group (P > 0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in Karnofsky functional status score (KPS score) between the two groups (P > 0.05). After one week of treatment, KPS score of Chaihu Pingwei Powder group was not significantly different from that before treatment (P > 0.05), while KPS score of the conventional group was lower than that before treatment, with highly statistically significant difference (P < 0.01). After one week of treatment, KPS score of Chaihu Pingwei Powder group was higher than that of the conventional group, with statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The incidence of gastrointestinal reaction and bone marrow suppression in Chaihu Pingwei Powder group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in CD4+/CD8+ between the two groups (P < 0.05). After one week of treatment, CD4+/CD8+ of the Chaihu Pingwei Powder group was increased compared with that before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), while CD4+/CD8+ of the conventional group was not significantly different from that before treatment (P > 0.05). After one week of treatment, CD4+/CD8+ of Chaihu Pingwei Powder group was significantly higher than that of the conventional group, and the difference was highly statistically significant (P < 0.01). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in the subjective overall nutritional status rating scale (PG-SGA) scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). After one week of treatment, PG-SGA score of Chaihu Pingwei Powder group was not significantly different from that before treatment (P > 0.05), while PG-SGA score of the conventional group was increased compared with that before treatment, with statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). After one week of treatment, the PG-SGA score of Chaihu Pingwei Powder group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group, and the difference was highly statistically significant (P < 0.01). Conclusion At the same time of chemotherapy, oral Chaihu Pingwei Powder can significantly reduce the degree of cancer fatigue fo some extent, improve the quality of life, reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal reaction and bone marrow suppression, and can enhance the immune function, has a certain effect on the prevention and treatment of CRF caused by chemotherapy.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 谢晓冬,张潇宇.癌因性疲乏最新进展——NCCN(2018版)癌因性疲乏指南解读[J].中国肿瘤临床,2018,45(16):817-820.
[2] Snyder M. Pathophysiological Phenomena in Nursing:Human Responses to Illness [J]. J Neurosci Nurs,1987,19(1):53.
[3] 孙燕,赵平.临床肿瘤学进展[M].北京:中国协和医科大学联合出版社,2005:178-179.
[4] 皋文君,刘砚燕,袁长蓉.国际肿瘤化疗药物不良反应评价系统——通用不良反应术语标准4.0版[J].肿瘤,2012, 32(2):142-144.
[5] Arends J,Bachmann P,Baracos V,et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients [J]. Clin Nutr,2017,36(1):11-48.
[6] Kr?觟z M,Fink M,Reif M,et al. Multimodal therapy concept and aerobic training in breast cancer patients with chronic cancer-related fatigue [J]. Integr Cancer Ther,2013,12(4):301-311.
[7] 焦广雨,陈玉超.癌因性疲乏辨治经验[J].中国民间疗法,2019,27(15):86-88.
[8] 于建华,江正龙,王宁军,等.补中益气汤改善癌因性疲乏[J].吉林中医药,2019,39(7):886-889.
[9] 祝利民,郭玲建,毛竹君,等.健脾益肾解毒方联合化疗对中晚期胃癌患者癌因性疲乏及免疫功能的影响[J].微循环学杂志,2019,29(3):39-44,48.
[10] 韩笑,迟文成,庞雪莹,等.十全大补汤改善肺癌患者化疗后癌因性疲乏效果及作用机制分析[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2019,21(5):139-142.
[11] 周岩,田乃菊,张法英,等.益气养阴汤辅助盐酸埃克替尼片治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌气阴两虚证患者癌因性疲乏疗效及对生活质量影响[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2020,27(2):13-17.
[12] 祝永福,张东伟,宇明慧,等.艾迪注射液联合化疗对晚期胃癌患者临床疗效及癌因性疲乏、生活质量的影响[J].湖北中医药大学学报,2019,21(4):29-33.
[13] 王娟.短期冥想训练对住院鼻咽癌患者心理痛苦及癌因性疲乏的影响[J].当代护士:中旬刊,2019,26(8):146-151.
[14] 卿阳,倪君莲,何为利.正念减压法对食管癌患者癌因性疲乏的研究综述[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019, 19(59):107-108.
[15] 李琼,涂朝勇.正念减压疗法对肝癌介入化疗栓塞患者癌因性疲乏和睡眠质量的改善作用[J].中国现代医生,2019,57(6):59-62.
[16] 杨丽惠,王曼,周天,等.基于“大病宜灸”理论探讨灸法治疗癌因性疲乏[J].中医杂志,2019,60(14):1194-1197.
[17] 张在翔,夏辉,乔普荣,等.雷火灸治疗胃癌化疗患者癌因性疲乏[J].中医学报,2019,34(12):2682-2686.
[18] 杨丽惠,胡凯文,田桢,等.灸法治疗癌因性疲乏选穴规律分析[J].中医学报,2019,34(12):2708-2711.
[19] 吴人杰,谢长生.癌因性疲乏发病机制及治疗的研究进展[J].肿瘤学杂志,2020,26(3):240-244.
[20] 蔡永.散聚汤加味对宫颈癌术后放化疗患者的癌因性疲乏和免疫功能的改善研究[J].天津中医药,2019,36(11):1069-1072.
[21] 陈聪.参芪扶正注射液对胃癌术后患者癌因性疲乏及代谢状态的影响[J].新中医,2019,51(10):224-226. |
|
|
|