|
|
Comparison of therapeutic effect of three different treatments for cerebrospinal fluid leakage induced by spinal surgery |
CHU Zhaoming CHEN Ming LYU You QIN Rujie LIU Yi |
Department of Spine Surgery, the First People′s Hospital of Lianyungang, Jiangsu Province, Lianyungang 222000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To compare the effects of three methods of wound compression bandaging, subarachnoid tube drainage and prolonged incision drainage on cerebrospinal fluid leakage after spinal surgery. Methods From March 2008 to March 2017, 183 patients from the Department of Spine Surgery, the First People′s Hospital of Lianyungang, Jiangsu Province, with cerebrospinal fluid leakage after spinal surgery were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into three groups: wound compression bandaging method with 61 cases (group A), subarachnoid tube drainage methods with 25 cases (group B), prolonged incision drainage method with 97 cases (group C) according to the postoperative treatment method. The cerebrospinal fluid leakage time, incision healing time, dressing change times, success rate of initial treatment and incidence of complications were compared among the three groups, as well as the incidence of postoperative fever, headache, increased inflammatory indicators, abnormal incision pain and muscle dyspepsia. Results The cerebrospinal fluid leakage time, incision healing time in group C, group B was shorter than those in the group A, the frequency of dressing change was less than that in group A, the cerebrospinal fluid leakage time, incision healing time in group C were shorter than that in the group B, the dressing change times was less than that in group B. The success rate of initial treatment in group C was higher than that in group A and B, and the incidence of complications in group C and group B was lower than that in group A, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the success rate of initial treatment between group A and group B or the incidence of complications between group C and group B (P > 0.05). Postoperative fever, increased inflammatory indicators, headache, abnormal incision pain, muscle strength hypoesthesia, and total occurrence in group B and group C were all less than those in group A, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between group B and group C (P > 0.05). Conclusions Prolonged incision drainage is a simple and efficient treatment for cerebrospinal fluid leakage after spinal surgery.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Hu P,Yu M,Liu X,et al. Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage after Surgeries on the Thoracic Spine: A Review of 362 Cases [J]. Asian Spine J,2016,10(3):472-479.
[2] Khazim R, Dannawi Z,Spacey K,et al. Incidence and treatment of delayed symptoms of CSF leak following lumbar spinal surgery [J]. Eur Spine J,2015,24(9):2069-2076.
[3] Jo DJ, Kim KT, Lee SH,et al. The Incidence and Management of Dural Tears and Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage during Corrective Osteotomy for Ankylosing Spondylitis with Kyphotic Deformity [J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc,2015,58(1):60-64.
[4] Elder BD,Theodros D,Sankey EW,et al. Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage During Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Its Effect on Spinal Fusion [J]. World Neurosurg,2016,89:636-40.
[5] Mitchell BD,Verla T,Reddy D,et al. Reliable Intraoperative Repair Nuances of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery and Review of the Literature [J]. World Neurosurg,2016,88:252-259.
[6] Inoue H,Takemoto M,Muto M,et al. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage and abducens nerve palsy caused by bowling activity [J]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku,2018,58(3):202-205.
[7] 邓若毅,余利民,邵明,等. 腰大池置管间断引流鞘内注射抗生素治疗胸腰椎术后脑脊液漏伴颅内感染[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2015,25(3):287-288.
[8] 汤博,赵宇.颈椎单开门后路术后脑脊液漏合并中枢感染一例报道[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2017,10(5):438-441.
[9] 李全,张源,梁跃伟,等.腰椎手术并发症-脑脊液漏的研究进展[J].昆明医科大学学报,2017,38(9):129-133.
[10] 王钰,雷鹏,朱迪,等.腰大池置管引流治疗椎管术后脑脊液漏[J].创伤外科杂志,2015,17(1):63-64.
[11] 崔雅清,吴宣辉,段大鹏,等.腰大池置管引流治疗颈椎前路手术后并发脑脊液漏[J].脊柱外科杂志,2019,17(1):33-36.
[12] 高亮亮,肖建如,严望军,等.腰大池引流治疗颈椎肿瘤术后脑脊液漏[J].脊柱外科杂志, 2016,14(6):352-355.
[13] 吴志强,严旭,邵擎东,等.腰大池引流对脊柱哑铃型肿瘤手术后脑脊液漏及相关并发症的影响[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2016,5(5):380-383.
[14] Kobayashi K,Ando K,Ito K,et al. Efficacy of intraoperative lumbar subarachnoid drainage for prevention of cerebrospinal fluid leak after spinal cord tumor resection [J]. J Orthop Sci,2018,23(2):266-272.
[15] 胡安文,李峰,蒲丹,等.术区持续引流切口愈合后拔管缝合管口治疗脊柱爆裂性骨折术后脑脊液漏疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2016,27(3):219-220.
[16] 程增银,马文海,崔建平,等.延长引流时间并间断夹闭引流管治疗脊柱术后脑脊液漏疗效观察[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2016,20(12):985-987.
[17] 王洪义,高明林,张瑶.长时间引流并间断夹闭治疗脊柱术后脑脊液漏疗效[J].山西医药杂志,2015,44(20):2405-2406.
[18] 马立泰,刘浩,龚全,等.延长引流时间治疗脊柱后路手术脑脊液漏的疗效分析[J].实用骨科杂志,2015,21(6):493-496.
[19] Mammadkhanli O, Elbir C, Hanalioglu S,et al. Subfascial drainage and clipping technique for treatment of cerebrospinal fluid leak following spinal surgery [J]. Neurosciences(Riyadh),2020,25(1):50-54.
[20] Menon SK,Onyia CU. A short review on a complication of lumbar spine surgery:CSF leak [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg,2015,139:248-251.
[21] 彭明学,王自鸿,张伟,等.深筋膜层改良缝合法预防胸椎后路术后脑脊液漏的临床价值探讨[J].颈腰痛杂志,2019,40(5):494-495.
[22] 石磊,陈德玉,史建刚,等.颈椎前路手术中硬膜损伤的预防与治疗[J].脊柱外科杂志,2017,15(3):156-160.
[23] Masuda S, Fujibayashi S, Otsuki B,et al. The dural repair using the combination of polyglycolic acid mesh and fibrin glue and postoperative management in spine surgery [J]. J Orthop Sci,2016,21(5):586-590.
[24] 许海晨,周忠.可吸收止血流体明胶治疗颈髓脑脊液漏1例[J].颈腰痛杂志,2016,37(6):539.
[25] Ishimoto Y, Kawakami M, Curtis E,et al. The New Strategy for the Treatment of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Following Lumbar Surgery [J]. Spine Surg Relat Res,2020,4(1):95-98.
[26] Farshad M, Aichmair A, Wanivenhaus F,et al. No benefit of early versus late ambulation after incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Eur Spine J,2020,29(1):141-146.
[27] 胡安文,李峰,蒲丹,等.不同方法治疗脊柱骨折伴硬脊膜损伤术后脑脊液漏的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2015,31(1):26-30. |
|
|
|