|
|
Effect of Edaravone in the hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA in patients with acute cerebral infarction |
XU Chunmei1 FAN Rong2 ZHANG Li3 |
1.Department of Neurology, the Second People′s Hospital of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province, Xichang 615000, China;
2.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the 63790 Military Hospital of the People′s Liberation Army of China, Sichuan Province, Xichang 615000, China; 3.Department of Pediatrics, Children′s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401122, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of Edaravone in the hemorrhagic transformation (HT) after intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in patients with acute cerebral infarction. Methods From January 2017 to December 2018, a total of 98 patients with acute cerebral infarction who were treated with rt-PA thrombolysis in the Second People′s Hospital of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture were selected and divided into control group (50 cases) and study group (48 cases) according to different treatment methods. The control group was treated with rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis and routine treatment. The study group was combined with Edaravone on the basis of the control group. The serum indexes (Matrix metalloproteinase-9 [MMP-9], plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], plasma cellular fibronectin [c-Fn]), national institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS) score and Barthel index of two groups were compared. Adverse reactions during treatment between the two groups were recorded. Results The levels of MMP-9, GFAP and c-Fn in the two groups on days 1 and 3 were higher than those before treatment, and the index levels on days 7 and 14 were lower than before treatment, while the time after treatment was longer, the index levels were lower, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The levels of MMP-9, GFAP, and c-Fn on the 3rd, 7th, and 14th days of treatment in the study group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In addition, the difference in the interaction of the indicators of the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). On the 14th day of treatment, the NIHSS score of the two groups were lower than before treatment, and the study group was lower than the control group; the Barthel index were higher than before treatment, and the study group was higher than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The total incidence of HT in the study group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion Edaravone can reduce the incidence of HT, improve the ability of self-care, reduce the damage of nerve function, and the safety of medication is better, which may be related to the down-regulation of MMP-9, GFAP, c-Fn and other factors.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 谢琛,刘静茹.自拟通腑化痰活血汤结合西医常规疗法治疗急性脑梗死[J].国际中医中药杂志,2019,41(4):335-338.
[2] 张卫国,王素洁,刘海燕,等.生脉注射液对轻中度脑梗死超时间窗rt-PA溶栓患者预后的影响[J].中国药房,2016,27(21):2918-2920.
[3] 叶静,姜爱钟.阿替普酶静脉溶栓联合依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死的临床效果[J].广西医学,2019,41(12):1509-1513.
[4] 赵仲艳,刘涛,赵二义,等.依达拉奉对阿尔茨海默病患者氧化应激和氧自由基代谢的影响[J].解放军医药杂志,2019,31(12):64-68.
[5] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2014[J].中华神经科杂志,2015,48(4):246-257.
[6] 李鹤婷,徐艳红,杨嘉君,等.rt-PA静脉溶栓脑梗死患者治疗前血清胆红素、尿酸水平与早期神经功能改善情况及预后的关系[J].山东医药,2017,57(27):43-45.
[7] 陈兴东,罗伟良.成人房颤急性脑梗死与非房颤急性脑梗死住院患者肾功能不全的对照分析[J].实用医学杂志,2017,33(7):1040-1043.
[8] 李佳佳,朱云,张晓璇,等.不同时间窗内rt-PA溶栓治疗VBA脑梗死的效果及预后[J].中国老年学杂志,2017, 37(24):6092-6094.
[9] 庞红立,关东升.机械介入取栓术联合rt-PA溶栓治疗对急性脑梗死患者血清PON-1、hs-CRP、Lp-PLA2、NSE 水平及神经功能评分的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(11):2561-2564.
[10] 苏敏,杨卫新,王万华,等.急性缺血性卒中重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂静脉溶栓致出血性转化及其预后的危险因素分析[J].中华神经科杂志,2011,44(11):754-758.
[11] 张兆辉,张清,何国厚,等.重组织型纤溶酶原激活剂联合依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死的系统评价[J].卒中与神经疾病,2015,34(1):31-36.
[12] 潘丹红,瞿笑丰,沈燕,等.依达拉奉联合rt-PA治疗对脑梗死患者的抗心磷脂抗体、内皮素-1和D-二聚体的影响[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2014,13(9):702-705.
[13] 夏东晖,张静,张新杰,等.艾地苯醌联合依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死临床研究[J].中国药业,2019,28(23):66-69.
[14] 胡英,李小刚.依达拉奉对脑缺血大鼠重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂溶栓后金属蛋白酶9表达的影响[J].中国卒中杂志,2009,4(6):475-479.
[15] 张莉峰,肖悠美,王爱丽,等.依达拉奉对急性脑梗死患者rt-PA静脉溶栓后MMP-9表达及出血性转化的影响[J].中国急救医学,2016,36(10):913-917.
[16] 刘琦,杨志勇,陈雄辉,等.依达拉奉联合康复治疗对脑梗死患者神经营养状态、氧化应激损伤调节作用分析[J].现代医院,2018,18(8):1194-1197.
[17] 覃星悦,肖海,樊金莲,等.依达拉奉联合重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗脑梗死的临床研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2016,16(33):6553-6555,6582.
[18] 肖云峰.依达拉奉对急性脑梗死患者的应用分析[J].中外医学研究,2019,17(4):153-154.
[19] 翟洁敏,宋文英.依达拉奉在脑缺血再灌注损伤中的保护作用及机制[J].中国临床医生杂志,2019,47(12):1432-1435.
[20] 梁国聪,陈伟婵,林力峰,等.依达拉奉联合溶栓治疗对急性脑梗死患者抗氧化能力及脑血流的影响研究[J].中国医学创新,2019,16(19):26-29.
[21] 刘振国.依达拉奉联合丹红注射液治疗急性脑梗死的疗效观察[J].中国现代医生,2019,57(7):99-101.
[22] 王洪军,李成刚,龚自力.尤瑞克林联合依达拉奉治疗急性进展性脑梗死的临床价值分析[J].实用医院临床杂志,2019,16(6):154-157.
[23] 孙海燕,陈静,景慧云,等.奥拉西坦联合依达拉奉在老年高血压脑出血康复中的临床观察[J].老年医学与保健,2019,25(6):817-820.
[24] 黄琳.依达拉奉辅助治疗急性脑梗死的可行性及对血浆炎性因子的影响[J].中国医药科学,2019,9(11):230-233.
[25] 杨丽.依达拉奉联合舒血宁注射液治疗急性脑梗死的效果[J].中国医药导报,2018,15(11):74-77.
[26] 辛佳,赵喜庆,张利,等.依达拉奉联合疏血通注射液治疗老年急性脑梗死的临床疗效[J].医学综述,2019,25(24):5021-5025. |
|
|
|