基于NIHSS评分的干预模式对重型颅脑损伤术后患者的影响

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (27)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (585 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore the influence of intervention mode based on the national institute health stroke scale (NIHSS) score on patients with severe craniocerebral injury after operation. Methods From October 2016 to October 2017, 47 patients with severe craniocerebral injury who underwent routine intervention in Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (“our hospital” for short) were selected as the control group. Forty-seven patients admitted to our hospital from November 2017 to November 2018 with NIHSS score intervention after severe craniocerebral injury were selected as the observation group. NIHSS score, Barthel index score, quality of life score and complication rate before and after intervention were compared between the two groups. Results After intervention, NIHSS scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before intervention, and Barthel index scores were significantly higher than those before intervention (P < 0.05); after intervention, NIHSS scores of the observation group were lower than that of the control group, and Barthel index scores were higher than that of the control group, the differences were all statistically significant (all P ＜ 0.05). The scores of physiological function, physiological function, physical pain, vitality, psychological, social function, emotional function and general health in the two groups were all higher than those before the intervention, and the differences were all statistically significant (all P ＜ 0.05). The scores of the observation group were all higher than those of the control group after the intervention, and the differences were all statistically significant (all P ＜ 0.05). The total incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). Conclusion The application of the intervention model based on NIHSS score in patients with severe craniocerebral injury after surgery can reduce the degree of neurological impairment, improve the ability of daily living and quality of life, and reduce the incidence of complications, which is worthy of promotion.

Key words： National institute health stroke scale score Severe head injury Daily living ability Complications Quality of life

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	TANG Jinli GU Yan FEI Yaya GONG Peipei

Cite this article:

TANG Jinli GU Yan FEI Yaya GONG Peipei. Effect of intervention model based on NIHSS score on patients with severe craniocerebral injury[J]. 中国医药导报, 2020, 17(14): 69-72,77.

URL:

http://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/EN/Y2020/V17/I14/69

[1] 廖红艳，陈云云.系统性急救护理程序在重型颅脑损伤患者急救中的应用效果[J].中国临床护理，2018，10（3）：245-248.
[2] 魏文桂，张艳景，张颖.不同温度肠内营养液对重型颅脑损伤术后胃肠功能障碍的影响[J].中华现代护理杂志，2018，24（22）：2686-2689.
[3] Odgaard L，Aadal L，Eskildsen M，et al. Nursing Sensitive Outcomes After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury：a Nationwide Study [J]. J Neurosci Nurs，2018，50（3）：149-154.
[4] 邓李.颅脑损伤患者血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶及心肌酶的变化及临床意义[J].中国医药导报，2016，13（5）：79-82.
[5] Teasdale G，Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale [J]. Lancet，1974，2（7872）：81-84.
[6] 侯东哲，张颖，巫嘉陵，等.中文版美国国立卫生院脑卒中量表的信度与效度研究[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志，2012，34（5）：372-374.
[7] 张雅静，张小兰，马延爱，等.Barthel指数量表应用于急性脑卒中患者生活能力测量的信度研究[J].中国护理管理，2007，7（5）：30-32.
[8] 李鲁，王红妹，沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志，2002，36（2）：109-113.
[9] Aadal L，Mortensen J，Nielsen JF. Weight reduction after severe brain injury：a challenge during the rehabilitation course [J]. J Neurosci Nurs，2015，47（2）：85-90.
[10] 冯妙坚，杜洁嫦，陈燕群.指法扩肛联合大黄粉穴位贴敷治疗重型颅脑损伤患者便秘的效果观察[J].现代临床护理，2016，15（4）：9-12.
[11] 李爱琴，陈洪英，张文源，等.音乐疗法对ICU颅脑损伤意识障碍（Doc）患者意识的影响[J].中国现代医生，2019，57（34）：87-89，92.
[12] 刘来兴，邓轶鑫，刘福泉，等.颅脑创伤患者的颅内压相关参数与预后的相关性研究[J].中国医学装备，2019， 16（10）：85-88.
[13] 钟运露.护理风险管理在重型颅脑损伤患者高压氧治疗中的应用[J].上海护理，2016，16（2）：74-76.
[14] 李岫炜，范宇召.路径式早期康复护理对颅脑损伤患者肌肉废用性萎缩的预防效果[J].中华现代护理杂志，2017，23（29）：3757-3760.
[15] 郑川燕，李霞，马静，等.重型颅脑损伤患者术后发生呼吸机相关性肺炎的影响因素分析[J].中国实用护理杂志，2017，33（3）：183-187.
[16] 蓝飞红，蒋维连，莫文静.团体接纳与承诺疗法对颅脑损伤恢复期患者创伤后成长的效果研究[J].中国实用护理杂志，2019，35（7）：506-510.
[17] 杜雪萍，陈燕珣，张映清，等.早期康复护理在颅脑损伤患者中的临床应用及护理效果[J].中国医药科学，2019， 9（9）：110-113.
[18] 叶春芬，王坤玉.不同喂养方式对重型颅脑损伤并发症的影响[J].中国现代医生，2018，56（4）：91-93.
[19] 季艳，甄云，曾云香.失效模式和效果分析在降低重型颅脑损伤患者非计划性拔管率中的应用[J].中国实用护理杂志，2017，33（6）：450-453.
[20] 王建宁，周松，王婧，等.低温肠内营养液在预防重型颅脑损伤患者应激性溃疡中的效果研究[J].中国实用护理杂志，2017，33（30）：2330-2333.
[21] 周颖，单学栋，宋红梅，等.间歇推进插管与螺旋型插管对重症颅脑损伤患者肠内营养的时效对比[J].中国医学装备，2018，15（5）：87-89.
[22] 丁燕晶，李金庭，叶嘉辉，等.经颅多普勒无创颅内压监测技术在颅脑损伤患者中的应用研究[J].中国医药科学，2018，8（9）：106-108.
[23] 李倩，刘菁，韩丁，等.高活菌数益生菌发酵乳联合肠内营养在颅脑损伤术后患者中的效果观察[J].中国医药，2018，13（2）：224-226.
[24] 张京芬.集束化护理在重症颅脑损伤行机械通气患者中的应用效果[J].中华现代护理杂志，2018，24（20）：2452-2455.
[25] 周筱春，赵凯怡，李霞，等.认知行为干预对重型颅脑损伤患儿照顾者照顾负担及应对方式的影响[J].护理学报，2018，25（17）：50-54.
[26] 唐翠，王滨琳.小组干预模式在中重度颅脑损伤患者照护者中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志，2018，24（6）：660-664.
[27] 王妮娜，刘杰，尚瑞玲，等.预见性干预在重型颅脑损伤伴多器官功能障碍综合征中的应用体会[J].中国临床神经外科杂志，2018，23（6）：433-434.