|
|
|
| Clinical application value of ultrasound and MRI in rotator cuff injury |
| YUAN Hongmei1 PU Jingsong2 YUE Wensheng1 CHEN Tianwu3 ZHOU Haiying3 GU Peng1 LEI Huilan1 |
1.Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Sichuan Province, Nanchong 637000, China;
2.Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Sichuan Province, Nanchong 637000, China;
3.Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Sichuan Province, Nanchong 637000, China |
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To evaluate the clinical value of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rotator cuff injury. Methods From January 2016 to February 2018, 38 cases of rotator cuff injury who confirmed by arthroscopy were collected in Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College. US and MRI were performed before operation. Shoulder arthroscopy was the gold standard. McNemer test was performed on US and MRI results of rotator cuff injury and Kappa test were used to evaluate the consistency of US and MRI in the diagnosis of rotator cuff injury and common complications. Results Arthroscopic examination showed that there were 26 full-thickness tears and 23 partial-thickness tears. The sensitivity，specificity，and accuracy of US in diagnosis of full-thickness tear were 92.31%, 100.00% and 98.24% respectively，while MRI was 96.15%, 100.00%, and 99.12% respectively. The sensitivity，specificity，and accuracy in US of the diagnosis of partial-thickness tear were 78.26%, 97.80% and 93.85% respectively, while 86.96%, 96.70% and 94.74% respectively in MRI. There was no statistically significant difference between the two methods in the diagnosis of rotator full-thickness tear and partial-thickness tear (P > 0.05). There was a good consistency between US and MRI in the diagnosis of rotator cuff full-thickness tears and partial-thickness tears (κ= 0.922, 0.811), but the consistency of US and MRI in the diagnosis of complications after rotator cuff tears was poor (κ = -0.068). Conclusion US can be used as the first screening diagnosis of clinical rotator cuff injury and the first choice for routine follow-up. When the diagnosis of rotator cuff injury is not clear or more detailed complications information is needed before surgery, MRI can be further performed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Chauhan NS，Ahluwalia A，Sharma YP，et al. A prospective comparative study of high resolution ultrasound and mri in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears in a tertiary hospital of north india [J]. Pol J Radiol，2016，81：491-497.
[2] Okoroha KR，Mehran N，Duncan J，et al. Characterization of rotator cuff tears：Ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Orthopedics，2017，40（1）：e124-e130.
[3] Wengert GJ，Schmutzer M，Bickel H，et al. Reliability of high-resolution ultrasound and magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder in patients with sports-related shoulder injuries [J]. PLoS One，2019，14（9）：e0222783.
[4] Needell SD，Zlatkin MB. Comparison of fat-saturation fast spin echo versus conventional spin-echo mri in the detection of rotator cuff pathology [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging，1997，7（4）：674-677.
[5] Teefey SA，Rubin DA，Middleton WD，et al. Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic，magnetic resonance imaging，and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am，2004，86（4）：708-716.
[6] Mohtasib RS，Alzahrani AM，Asiri YN，et al. Accuracy of shoulder ultrasound examination for diagnosis of rotator cuff pathologies：A single-center retrospective study [J]. Ann Saudi Med，2019，39（3）：162-171.
[7] Smith TO，Back T，Toms AP，et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for rotator cuff tears in adults：A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Clin Radiol，2011，66（11）：1036-1048.
[8] 刘驰，张耀南，薛庆云.超声及MRI检查诊断肩袖撕裂的临床研究[J].中华关节外科杂志：电子版，2015，9（3）：305-309.
[9] Apostolopoulos AP，Angelis S，Yallapragada RK，et al. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in detecting rotator cuff tears [J]. Cureus，2019，11（5）：e4581.
[10] Roy JS，Bra?觕n C，Leblond J，et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography，mri and mr arthrography in the characterisation of rotator cuff disorders：A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Br J Sports Med，2015，49（20）：1316-1328.
[11] 贺涓涓，窦祖林，解东风，等.肌骨超声影像分析肩痛患者流行病学及影像学特点[J].中国老年学，2017，37（22）：5668-5670.
[12] 刘益坤，郑元义.钙化性冈上肌腱炎的超声诊断及治疗价值[J].临床超声医学杂志，2018，20（7）：472-474.
[13] Barile A，Bruno F，Mariani S，et al. What can be seen after rotator cuff repair：A brief review of diagnostic imaging findings [J]. Musculoskelet Surg，2017，101（Suppl 1）：3-14.
[14] Rutten MJ，Spaargaren GJ，van Loon T，et al. Detection of rotator cuff tears：The value of mri following ultrasound [J]. Eur Radiol，2010，20（2）：450-457.
[15] Kobayashi T，Yamamoto A，Shitara H，et al. Surgeon-operated in-office ultrasonography for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears：A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Surgical Science，2013，4（9A）：6-14.
[16] 张丽丽，陈业媛，王华菊，等.高频超声与磁共振成像对冈上肌腱撕裂的诊断价值[J].实用临床医学，2019，20（5）：54-57，108.
[17] Zheng F，Wang H，Gong H，et al. Role of ultrasound in the detection of rotator-cuff syndrome：An observational study [J]. Med Sci Monit，2019，25：5856-5863.
[18] 宋宝东，浦瑶瑶.3.0t常规MRI技术在肩袖撕裂诊断中的意义[J].中国实验诊断学，2019，23（3）：469-471.
[19] Pavic R，Margetic P，Bensic M，et al. Diagnostic value of us，mr and mr arthrography in shoulder instability [J]. Injury，2013，44 Suppl 3：S26-S32.
[20] Fischer CA，Weber MA，Neubecker C，et al. Ultrasound vs. Mri in the assessment of rotator cuff structure prior to shoulder arthroplasty [J]. J Orthop，2015，12（1）：23-30.
[21] Griffith JF. Top-ten pitfalls in rotator cuff ultrasound [J]. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol，2019，23（4）：429-435.
[22] 何昌颖，方北，李开林，等.研究比较肩袖损伤应用高频超声与关节镜的诊断价值[J].黑龙江医药，2019，32（2）：456-458. |
|
|
|
