|
|
MRI-based three-dimensional reconstruction of pelvic levator ani muscle and bony pelvis on male patients with rectal prolapse |
CUI Guoce1 LI Yufei2 LI Huashan2 |
1.Department of Proctology, South District, Guang′anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 102618, China;
2.Department of Proctology, Guang′anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To study the three-dimensional reconstruction of pelvic levator supporting tissue (levator ani muscle and bony pelvis) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to observe and measure the parameters of two-dimensional MRI images and three-dimensional models of levator ani muscle and pelvic reconstruction. Methods From October 2016 to December 2018, 11 male patients admitted to Guang′anmen Hospital and South District, Guang′anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences with rectal prolapse as the main diagnosis were selected as the observation group, and 13 healthy male volunteers were recruited as the control group at the same time. MRI scan was performed in both groups to observe original data on levator ani muscle hiatus shape, iliococcygeus form and break of levator ani muscle. Mimics 19.0 three-dimensional reconstruction software was used for three-dimensional reconstruction, and morphological characteristics of three-dimensional models of levator ani muscle and bony pelvis were observed. The levator hiatus width (LHW), levator hiatus length (LHL), levator symphysis gap of left and right side (LSG-L, LSG-R), levator plate angle (LPA), levator ani muscle volume (LVOL), iliococcygeus width of left and right side (ICW-L, ICW-R), iliococcygeal angle of left and right side (ICA-L, ICA-R), pubococcygeal line (PCL), pubic arch angle (PAA), interspinous diameter (IS), intertuberous diameter (IT) were compared and measured. Results Compared with the control group, the levator ani muscle hiatus shape, iliococcygeus form in the observation group were changed to some extent, and the levator ani muscle had a large degree of rupture defect. Compared with the control group, LHW, LHL, LSG-L, LSG-R, LPA were increased, LVOL was decreased in the observation group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The differences of ICW-L, ICW-R, ICA-L, ICA-R between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). PCL and IT in the observation group were higher than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The differences of IS and PAA between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion MRI two-dimensional and three-dimensional data sets reflect the spatial structure and adjacent relationship of pelvic levator ani muscle between healthy men and male patients with rectal prolapse, and evaluate the functional status of pelvic levator supporting structure, which provides an important reference for clinical classification diagnosis, surgical method selection and postoperative efficacy evaluation.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 崔国策,祝子贝,李华山.消庤灵直肠周围间隙八点注射法治疗完全性直肠脱垂的疗效观察[J].中华中医药杂质,2017,32(5):2315-2318.
[2] Singh K,Jakab M,Reid WM,et al. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging assessment of levator ani morphologic features in different grades of prolapse [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2003,188(4):910-915.
[3] 李筠,杨文生,罗武.MRI在产后盆底功能障碍早期评估中的应用[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2019,17(1):110-113.
[4] 刘萍,唐连,陈春林,等.盆腔器官脱垂女性肛提肌静动态MRI三维变化特点[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2019, 42(1):37-40,53.
[5] 黄冬冬,白莉莉.静动态MRI及扩散张量成像评估盆腔器官脱垂患者肛提肌形态和功能的价值[J].浙江创伤外科,2019,24(1):51-52.
[6] Zhuang RR,Song YF,Chen ZQ,et al. Levator avulsion using a tomographic ultrasound and magnetic resonance-based model [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2011,205(3):231.e1-231.e8.
[7] Cai XR,Qiu L,Wu HJ,et al. Assessment of levator ani morphology and function in asymptomatic nulliparous women via static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2013,121(3):233-239.
[8] 崔国策.基于磁共振成像的直肠脱垂盆底组织三维重建研究[D].北京:中国中医科学院,2018.
[9] 刘丽,刘静华,蒋莹,等.经会阴三维超声断层成像评估盆腔器官脱垂患者肛提肌损伤的康复疗效[J].中华医学超声杂志:电子版,2019,16(1):54-60.
[10] 蒋云秀,潘永寿,潘焕贵,等.经会阴三维超声评估分娩对肛提肌的影响[J].右江医学,2019,47(3):176-179.
[11] 朱振.PPH联合直肠黏膜柱状缝合及结扎术治疗直肠脱垂的效果[J].中外医学研究,2019,17(5):131-132.
[12] 程宇宁.动态MRI对女性盆底器官脱垂患者盆底器官及肛提肌的评价研究[D].沈阳:中国医科大学,2018.
[13] Margulies RU,Hsu Y,Kearney R,et al. Appearance of the levator ani muscle subdivisions in magnetic resonance images [J]. Obstet Gynecol,2006,107(5):1064-1069.
[14] Hsu Y,Summers A,Hussain HK,et al. Levator plate angle in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared to women with normal support using dynamic MR imaging [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2006,194(5):1427-1433.
[15] Hoyte L,Fielding JR,Versi E,et al. Variations in levator ani volume and geometry in women:the application of MR based 3D reconstruction in evaluating pelvic floor dysfunction [J]. Arch Esp Urol,2001,54(6):532-539.
[16] Handa VL,Pannu HK,Siddique S,et al. Architectural differences in the bony pelvis of women with and without pelvic floor disorders [J]. Obstet Gynecol,2003,102(6):1283-1290.
[17] Handa VL,Lockhart ME,Kenton KS,et al. Magnetic resonance assessment of pelvic anatomy and pelvic floor disorders after childbirth [J]. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct,2009,20(2):133-139.
[18] Franciscus RG. When did the modern human pattern of childbirth arise? New insights from an old Neandertal pelvis [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2009,106(23):9125-9126.
[19] Hoyte L,Damaser MS. Magnetic resonance-based female pelvic anatomy as relevant for maternal childbirth injury simulations [J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci,2007,1101:361-376.
[20] Stein TA,Kaur G,Summers A,et al. Comparison of bony dimensions at the level of the pelvic floor in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,200(3):241.e1-e5.
[21] 徐泽玮,朱莉娅,李宗安,等.血管组织三维模型重建及力学特征分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2019,23(20):3158-3163.
[22] 鲍欣妍.人体脊椎三维模型重建及有限元分析[D].吉林:吉林大学,2018.
[23] 罗伟.髋骨的三维重建技术与生物力学仿真研究[D].太原:中北大学,2017. |
|
|
|