|
|
Clinical application of continuous cardiac output monitoring with pulse index in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock |
WANG Yaqin1 YAO Huang2 HU Xiaocong1 LUAN Jin1 LI Tingyi3 |
1.Intensive Care Unit, Xiaogan Central Hospital, Hubei Province, Xiaogan 432000, China;
2.Department of Emergency, Liyuan Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Province, Wuhan 430000, China; 3.Department of Neurology, Xiaogan Central Hospital, Hubei Province, Xiaogan 432000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical application of pluse indicator continuous cardiac output (PICCO) monitoring in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS). Methods One hundred and seven patients with AMI and CS admitted to Xiaogan Central Hospital of Hubei Province from February 2015 to October 2018 were selected, while divided into non-PICCO group (53 cases) and PICCO group (54 cases) by random number table method. Non-PICCO group was given routine monitoring treatment, while PICCO group was treated under the guidance of PICCO. The clinical effects (including the use time of vasoactive drugs, hospitalization time, mechanical ventilation time and mortality) of the two groups were compared. The cardiac index (CI), extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) and global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) were compared in PICCO group after 24, 48 and 72 hours. The changes of high sensitive troponin (hs-cTnI), N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) scores after 24, 48 hours of treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The use time of vasoactive drugs, hospitalization time and mechanical ventilation time in PICCO group were shorter than those in non-PICCO group, while the mortality rate in the PICCO group was significantly lower than that in the non-PICCO group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). After 48 and 72 hours of treatment, CI, EVLWI, ITBVI and GEDVI in PICCO group were significantly higher than those after 24 hours of treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). While after 72 hours of treatment, CI, EVLWI, ITBVI and GEDVI were significantly higher than those after 48 hours of treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in hs-cTnI, NT-proBNP and APACHE Ⅱ scores between after 48 hours and 24 hours of treatment in non-PICCO group (P > 0.05). The scores of hs-cTnI, NT-proBNP and APACHE Ⅱ after 48 hours of treatment in the PICCO group were lower than those after 24 hours of treatment, while were lower than those in the non-PICCO group at the same time point, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion PICCO monitoring has a certain application effect in the treatment of patients with AMI and CS. It can improve tissue perfusion and reduce the mortality of patients with AMI and CS.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 孙红亮,段晓蕾,刘兰.急性心肌梗死所致心源性休克患者40例临床治疗分析[J].心理医生,2018,24(34):64-65.
[2] 孟赫禹,崔兰.外周血中长链酰基辅酶A合成酶1基因高表达在急性心肌梗死风险评估中的意义[J].中国老年学杂志,2017,37(12):2921-2924.
[3] 魏小红,刘文娴.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者IABP-SHOCKⅡ评分对院内死亡风险的预测价值[J].中国医药,2018,13(9):1281-1284.
[4] 郝芳.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克病人临床特点分析[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2014,12(2):249-251.
[5] Liu CA,Sui J,Coté CJ,et al. The Use of Epinephrine in Caudal Anesthesia Increases Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output in Children [J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2016,41(16):780-786.
[6] 刘学路,孟永.老年急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后联合应用主动脉球囊反搏对术后的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2016,36(24):6114-6116.
[7] 张源波,郭凯,杨萌,等.脉搏指数连续心输出量监测老年急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者心功能指标的分析[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2018,20(9):906-909.
[8] 中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会,《中国循环杂志》编辑委员会,等.急性心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2001,29(12):710-725.
[9] 林曙光,陈纪言.急性心肌梗死并心源性休克的诊断与治疗[J].临床内科杂志,2001,18(1):5-7.
[10] 杨增强,蔡兰兰.丹参酮ⅡA磺酸钠注射液对急性心肌梗死患者心肌酶学及心脏泵血功能的影响[J].国际中医中药杂志,2017,39(7):587-591.
[11] 李瑞娜.重组人脑利钠肽对急性心肌梗死并心源性休克疗效及预后分析[J].安徽医药,2019,23(4):696-699.
[12] 尚永志,冯雁,秦雷,等.IABP辅助直接PCI治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克的效果和危险因素分析[J].中国急救医学,2016,36(10):918-923.
[13] 张德龙,殷莉,姜芳,等.参麦注射液联合左西孟旦治疗老年急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克的临床研究[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2018,27(13):1453-1457.
[14] 丁佳慧,王中林,彭明清.血流动力学监测的研究进展与临床应用[J].重庆医学,2016,45(14):1989-1992.
[15] 方瑾,黄鹤.血流动力学支持设备在心源性休克中应用的研究进展[J].安徽医药,2018,22(11):2067-2070.
[16] Freidl T,Baik N,Pichler G,et al. Haemodynamic Transition after Birth:A New Tool for Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring [J]. Neonatology,2017,111(1):55-60.
[17] 冯丽钦,陈东玲,展丽元,等.PICCO在心肌梗死心源性休克患者精细容量管理中的护理体会[J].中国实用护理杂志,2013,29(z2):23-24.
[18] 魏华,黄金秀,蔡海荣,等.慢性肺源性心脏病合并心源性休克应用PICCO监测仪的临床疗效及对患者血流动力学的影响[J].中国医学创新,2018,15(17):50-53.
[19] 张源波,韩聚强,郭凯,等.脉搏指数连续心输出量监测在老年急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者治疗中的作用[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2017,19(7):708-711.
[20] 彭川,韩文龙.重症医学科休克患者应用脉搏指示连续心排量监测技术的价值分析[J].中国医学创新,2019, 16(3):114-117.
[21] 楚磊,赵灵.PICCO技术应用于急性心肌梗死合并心力衰竭对患者心功能的影响[J].四川医学,2018,39(10):1144-1147. |
|
|
|