|
|
Effect of CT-guided double-lumen bronchial catheterization on stress response protein level in patients |
WANG Benqi ZHAO Zhenru WANG Xin HU Jie PENG Yinming |
Department of Anesthesiology, Chengde Central Hospital of Hebei Province, Hebei Province, Chengde 067000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of CT-guided double-lumen bronchial catheterization on stress response protein level in patients. Methods 90 patients undergoing thoracic surgery under general anesthesia and one-lung ventilation from January 2016 to January 2018 in Chengde Central Hospital of Hebei Province were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into control group (n = 50) and observation group (n = 40) by random number table method. Patients in control group were treated with traditional intubation method, while patients in observation group were treated with double-lumen bronchial tube intubation guided by chest CT. The clinical effects and stress response protein levels before and after intubation were compared between two groups. Results There was no significant difference in one lung ventilation time and anesthesia time between two groups (P > 0.05); the intubation time of observation group was shorter than that of control group, and the number of intubation attempts of observation group was less than that of control group (P < 0.05). After intubation, MDA levels in both groups were significantly higher than those before intubation (P < 0.05), SOD and GSH-px levels were significantly lower than those before intubation (P < 0.05), and the changes in observation group were smaller (P < 0.05). After intubation, the levels of CRP, IL-1β and IL-6 in two groups were significantly higher than those before intubation (P < 0.05), and the changes in observation group were smaller (P < 0.05). The incidence of hoarseness and sore throat at 24 hours after operation in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Chest CT guided double-lumen bronchial catheter intubation has good clinical effect and less stimulation to stress response.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 张志君,牛志强,郑孟良,等.双腔支气管导管与支气管阻塞导管在胸科手术单肺通气患者中的应用[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(1):153-155.
[2] 黄剑峰,陈丽妮,冼海燕,等.支气管套囊监测小囊压力引导双腔管插管的临床教学应用[J].微创医学,2018,13(5):663-664.
[3] 宗志军,李元海,王义桥.支气管套囊充气法在右侧双腔支气管导管定位中的应用[J].安徽医学,2018,39(9):1064-1067.
[4] 李凌海,史志国,刘涛,等.纤维支气管镜引导双腔气管导管插管和可视双腔气管导管插管的对比研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2018,24(8):42-45.
[5] 周文,李军.纤维支气管镜在左侧双腔支气管导管插管中的应用[J].山西医科大学学报,2018,49(1):80-83.
[6] 罗年丰,姜闽英,陈华樑,等.神经刺激仪定位下腰丛联合坐骨神经阻滞对下肢手术患者血液动力学及应激反应的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2018,18(20):3949-3953.
[7] 李立,王骐,张娜,等.阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷治疗脑梗死的疗效及对氧化应激反应血液流变性的影响[J].河北医学,2018,24(11):1922-1926.
[8] 王振亚.腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术老年患者应用右美托咪定影响围术期应激反应及免疫功能的观察[J].中国医学工程,2018,1(11):13-17.
[9] 罗云梅.胸外科单肺通气手术封堵支气管导管与双腔气管导管技术运用的临床效果对比分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2017,22(3):486-487.
[10] 刘国亮,张建敏.Arndt支气管内阻断器和双腔支气管导管在小儿单肺通气中的比较[J].首都医科大学学报,2017, 38(3):361-364.
[11] 石远波,罗艳萍,陈汉强,等.可视喉镜配合纤维支气管镜引导双腔支气管插管在胸外科手术麻醉中的应用[J].中国现代医生,2017,55(31):103-106.
[12] 卢增停,蔡永红,王立勋,等.国产小儿型明视插管软镜和听诊法用于双腔支气管导管定位的对比研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2017,23(10):6-10.
[13] 李婧,张霖,王佳,等.可视双腔支气管导管在双腔支气管导管插管中的应用优势[J].中国药物与临床,2018, 18(9):1564-1566.
[14] 戴洪,钱俊,张金杨,等.纤维支气管镜在双腔支气管导管插管的临床应用[J].昆明医科大学学报,2018,39(9):120-123.
[15] 刘晴雪,王建娟,吴海燕,等.改良塑形双腔支气管导管插管在单肺通气手术中的应用[J].山东医药,2018,58(33):64-66.
[16] 赵振儒,王本奇,刘忠,等.胸部CT指引双腔支气管导管插管的临床应用效果[J].东南大学学报:医学版,2018, 37(4):638-641.
[17] 刘光顺,王忠慧,马良,等.胸部CT对右侧双腔支气管插管对位不良预测作用的临床分析[J].重庆医学,2018, 47(5):690-692.
[18] 高蓓.CT辅助下成人气道测定与双腔支气管导管选择[D].苏州:苏州大学,2017.
[19] 岳之峰.CT测量不同右主支气管长度的胸科手术患者行右侧双腔支气管插管的比较[D].石家庄:河北医科大学,2016.
[20] 张干,车邦民,梁大干,等.右美托咪定对双腔支气管插管单孔胸腔镜肺大泡切除术患者围术期应激反应的影响[J].牡丹江医学院学报,2015,36(4):25-27. |
|
|
|