|
|
Effect of intestinal microecological preparation on complications after hemorrhoid stapler operation |
LI E1 XU Jia2 HE Yinghua1 |
1.Department of Anorectal, Guanganmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China;
2.Department of General Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of intestinal microecological preparation on complications after hemorrhoid stapler operation. Methods Seventy patients underwent procedure for prolapse hemorrhoids (PPH) in the Anorectal Department of Guanganmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences from June 2017 to June 2018 were selected, patients were divided into observation group (n = 35) and control group (n = 35) by random number table method. Routine preoperative preparation was performed in the control group, and the observation group were given oral and retention enema of Bifidobacterium Triad and Subtilis Triad on the basis of the control group. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to compare the postoperative pain degree of the two groups, as well as the relief time of bleeding, anal distension and anastomotic inflammation degree of the two groups. Results VAS scores of the two groups on the first day after surgery showed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). VAS score of observation group was lower than that of control group on the 7th day after the operation, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative bleeding and anal distension in the observation group was compared with that in the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Patients in the observation group had shorter time to relieve anal distention than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). On the 7th day after the operation, the incidence of mild anastomotic inflammation was lower in the observation group than in the control group, with statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The anastomosis condition of observation group was better than that of control group on the 7th day and the 1st month after the operation, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). No anastomotic leakage occurred in both groups within 1 month after operation. Conclusion The application of preoperative microecological preparation may reduce the postoperative pain of PPH, relieve the anal distension quickly, and decrease the incidence of anastomotic inflammation.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] van Praagh JB,de Goffau MC,Bakker IS,et al. Intestinal microbiota and anastomotic leakage of stapled colorectal anastomoses:a pilot study [J]. Surg Endosc,2016,30(6):2259-2265.
[2] Hempel S,Newberry SJ,Maher AR,et al. Probiotics for the Prevention and Treatment of Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J]. JAMA,2012,307(18):1959-1969.
[3] 杨新庆.解读《痔诊治暂行标准》[J].中华全科医师杂志,2005,4(7):406-407.
[4] 宗行,万之助.疼痛的估价用特殊的视觉模拟评分法作参考(VAS)[J].疼痛学杂志,1994,2(4):153.
[5] Burch J,Epstein D,Sari AB,et al. stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids:a systematic review [J]. Colorectal Dis,2009,11(3):1021-1023.
[6] Tjandra JJ,Chan MK. Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy)[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2007,50(6):878.
[7] Zbar AP. Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsing haemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) [J]. Tech Coloproctol,2008,12(1):7-19.
[8] 甄建华,于河,谷晓红.肠道微生态医学研究进展概述[J].中华中医药杂志,2017,32(7):3069-3075.
[9] 何小平,张孟,戴承恩,等.益生菌临床应用的研究进展[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2018,37(3):130-135.
[10] 张澍田,赵海英.微生态调节剂对肝硬化肠屏障改变的干预作用[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(39):2742-2743.
[11] 徐娜娜,范文廷,毕茹茹,等.功能性便秘患者肠道菌群分析及肠道菌群调节作用的研究进展[J].临床检验杂志,2018,36(1):34-36.
[12] Furusawa Y,Obata Y,Fukuda S,et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells [J]. Nature,2013,504(7480):446-450.
[13] Sonnenburg JL,Angenent LT,Gordon JI. Getting a grip on things:how do communities of bacterial symbionts become established in our intestine? [J]. Nat Immunol,2004,5(6):569.
[14] Claus SP,Ellero SL,Berger B,et al. Colonization-Induced Host-Gut Microbial Metabolic Interaction [J]. Mbio,2011,2(2):271-210.
[15] Tap J,Furet JP,Bensaada M,et al. Gut microbiota richness promotes its stability upon increased dietary fibre intake in healthy adults [J]. Environ Microbiol,2015,17(12):4954-4964.
[16] Alam A,Leoni G,Quiros M,et al. The microenvironment of injured murine gut elicits a local prorestitutivemicrobiota [J]. Nat Microbiol,2016,1(2):15 021.
[17] 李东正,周建农.肠道微生态制剂对结直肠癌患者术后免疫功能及并发症的影响[J].中国医药导报,2016,13(35):106-109.
[18] 杨国林,赵登秋.微生态肠内营养对结直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群、免疫功能和并发症的影响[J].中国初级卫生保健,2018,32(2):83-85.
[19] Png E,Siak JK,Chew J,et al. Comment on "The bacterial fermentation product butyrate influences epithelial signaling via reactive oxygen species-mediated changes in cullin-1 neddylation" [J]. J Immunol,2009,183(7):4146.
[20] Chan EC,Jiang F,Peshavariya HM,et al. Regulation of cell proliferation by NADPH oxidase-mediated signaling:potential roles in tissue repair,regenerative medicine and tissue engineering [J]. Pharmacol Ther,2009,122(2):97-108. |
|
|
|