|
|
Analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes of different chorionic twins |
LI Ting FENG Bibo▲ ZHAI Jianjun |
Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To analyze maternal and neonatal outcomes of different chorionic twins, in order to investigate the effect of chorionic villi on the complications of pregnant women. Methods The clinical data of 559 twin pregnancy women in Beijing Tongren Hospital from January 2011 to December 2015 were collected, according to the results of chorionic nature by ultrasound in early trimester and pathologic checking the placenta and membrane after delivery, they were divided into two groups: monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy group (monochorionic twin group, 198 cases) and diachorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy group (diachorionic twin group, 361 cases), the pregnancy complications of pregnant women and outcomes of fetal-neonate of two groups were compared. Results The incidence of complications during pregnancy such as gestational hypertension,gestational diabetes, polyhydramnios, premature rupture of membranes and placenta abrupture and sevene postpartum hemorrhage of monochorionic twin group was 24.7%, 16.7%, 14.6%, 18.2%, 4.6%, 4.0% respectively, those of the diachorionic twin group was 21.6%, 15.5%, 13.6%, 17.5%, 3.9%,4.7% respectively, there was a statistically significant only in the incidence of preterm of two groups (P < 0.05). The fetal loss, complicated twin, asphyxia rate of neonatal and mortality rate of the monochorionic twin group (17.7%, 54.6%, 13.1%, 4.6% respectively) were significantly higher than those of the diachorionic twin group (4.4%, 21.3%, 4.4%, 2.8% respectively), the difference were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Chorionic properties of pregnancy complications in two groups have no difference, but monochorionic twin pregnancies has a higher risk, it should be accurately determine about the chorionic nature in the first trimester, setting up monitoring and intervention measures during pregnancy to improve the outcomes of fetal-newborn.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Corsello G,Piro E. The world of twins:an update the journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine:the official journal of the European association of perinatal medicine,the federation of Asia and Oceania perinatal societies [J]. In Soc Perinatal Obstetr,2010,23(3):59-62.
[2] 周艳,徐丽玲,汪平,等.双绒毛膜及单绒毛膜双胎与妊娠期并发症及围生儿结局分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2012, 28(5):347-350.
[3] 王金光,乔宠,刘彩霞.双胎妊娠并发妊娠期高血压的危险因素[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2016,8(5):3-5.
[4] 谢辛,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:211-224.
[5] 于书君,孙丽洲.复杂性双胎的研究进展[J].医学综述,2012,18(12):1890-1893.
[6] 符元春.产前超声检查在双胎妊娠并发症诊断及治疗中的价值[J].当代医学,2016,22(19):64-65.
[7] 王谢桐,李红燕.重视单绒毛膜双胎妊娠的临床研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2013,48(6):401-404.
[8] 刘莉,吴丽莉.双胎妊娠绒毛膜性质对孕妇妊娠期并发症及围生儿预后的影响[J].中国医药导报,2015,12(14):71-73.
[9] 王霞,卢瑾文,张元珍.超声影像学在双胎输血综合征的预测和产前诊断中的应用[J].中华围产医学杂志,2014, 17(3):207-211.
[10] 林其德,马宁.多胎妊娠的早期管理[J].国际妇产科学杂志,2013,40(6):483-484.
[11] 赵蕾,肖梅.10年112例复杂性双胎妊娠的母儿结局[J].中国产前诊断杂志:电子版,2010,2(1):34-37.
[12] 韦晓昱,李奎.急性双胎输血综合征的诊断及预防[J].中华围产医学杂志,2015,18(7):549-550.
[13] 原婷,张婷,王艳艳.不同绒毛膜性双胎合并新生儿不良结局的危险因素分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2016,32(12):917-921.
[14] 余海燕,刘子建,Daljit SS.单绒毛膜双胎妊娠的围产结局分析[J].中华妇产科学杂志,2013,48(6):405-410.
[15] 祝彩霞,刘培培,王冬昱,等.不同绒毛膜性双胎妊娠的早产原因及其影响因素[J].中华围产医学杂志,2016, 19(4):269-273.
[16] 程春花,李根霞.65例复杂性双胎妊娠母儿结局[J].当代医学,2014,20(25):18-19.
[17] 戴钟英.双胎输血综合征[J].实用妇产科杂志,2012,28(5):217-325.
[18] 蒋瑜,杨太珠.产前超声检查在双胎输血综合征中的应用进展[J].临床超声医学杂志,2012,14(4):257-259.
[19] 王学举,魏瑗,原鹏波.双胎输血综合征胎盘特点分析[J].中华妇产科学杂志,2015,95(17):1323-1327.
[20] 庄文明,陈安儿,张婧.脐动脉血流异常的单绒毛膜和双绒毛膜双胎的临床研究[J].浙江临床医学,2016,18(2):231-233. |
|
|
|