|
|
Study on influencing factors of catheter-related infection in hemodialysis patients and nursing countermeasures |
WANG Jing1 HUANG Wenzhi2 CHEN Junjun1 LIN Daxiu1 |
1.Intensive Care Unit, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China;
2.Department of Hospital Infection Control, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To study the influencing factors and nursing strategies of catheter-related infection (CRBSI) in hemodialysis patients. Methods From January 2016 to December 2017, 450 patients with hemodialysis in West China Hospital of Sichuan University who had established venous catheter access were selected as subjects for retrospective analysis. The general data, clinical treatment plan and the information of postoperative infection of the patients were collected. Multiple factors Logistic regression analysis was used and related nursing countermeasures were worked out. Results The incidence of CRBSI in hemodialysis patients was 18.22% (82/450). All patients were divided into uninfected group and infected group. The results of univariate analysis showed that: these two groups have obvious difference in age, WBC count (WBC), erythrocyte count (RBC), hematocrit (HCT), hemoglobin (Hb), creatinine (SCr), urea nitrogen (BUN), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and indwelling catheter time, times of intubation and diabetes mellitus, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that age (OR = 2.084, 95%CI: 1.812-15.825, P = 0.007), catheterization time (OR = 2.556, 95%CI: 1.842-21.794, P = 0.000), hemoglobin (OR = 1.988, 95%CI: 1.235-14.506, P = 0.013) and diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.646, 95%CI: 2.005-7.487, P = 0.026) were independent risk factors for CRBSI in hemodialysis patients. Conclusion The time of catheterization, age, hemoglobin and diabetes mellitus are the risk factors of CRBSI in hemodialysis patients with venous catheterization. It is necessary to improve the aseptic awareness and operation level of nurses when making clinical nursing plan.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 张翠.血液透析病人深静脉导管感染相关因素分析及防治[J].心血管病防治知识:学术版,2016,6(6):145-146.
[2] 张丽萍,付阿丹,朱江,等.血液透析患者导管相关性血流感染风险评估研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2015,10(23):5421-5423.
[3] 郭晓燕,冯晓楠,王革,等.血液透析患者中心静脉临时导管感染危险因素分析[J].宁夏医学杂志,2018,40(3):280-282.
[4] Napalkov P,Felici DM,Chu LK,et al. Incidence of catheter-re-lated complications in patients with central venous or hemodialysiscatheters:a health care claims database analysis [J]. BMC Cardio-vasc Disor,2013,16(13):86.
[5] 张京利,王力红,马文晖,等.中心静脉导管相关血流感染的诊治及预防[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2008,18(7):952-954.
[6] Moghaddas A,Abbasi MR,Gharekhani A,et al. Prevention of he-modialysis catheter-related blood stream infections using a cotrimoxazole-lock technique [J]. Future Microbiol,2015,10(2):169-178.
[7] 孙莉红,郑海燕.血液透析病人导管相关性血流感染影响因素分析及其护理对策[J].全科护理,2018,16(2):187-189.
[8] 姚春瑛,陈蕾,曲晓璐,等.改良无缝合固定方式在血液透析临时导管维护中的应用[J].护理研究,2016,30(20):2503-2505.
[9] 陈敏,朱日进,陈锋,等.中心静脉导管相关性感染临床分析[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2013,22(4):352-355.
[10] 刘欣敏,高岚.老年肿瘤患者 PICC 导管相关性感染的危险因素及集束化干预措施[J].中国老年学杂志,2015, 7(19):5660-5662.
[11] 冯错,李艳.导管相关性血流感染患者金黄色葡萄球菌的耐药情况分析[J].山东医药,2015,47(8):86-87.
[12] Kodama Y,Okamoto Y,Tanabe T,et al. Central venous catheterrelated blood stream infection with pyomyositis due to Stenotro-homonas maltophilia after allogeneic bone marrow transplanta-tion in a patient with aplastic anemia [J]. Pediatr Transplant,2016,20(2):329-332.
[13] 李秀霞.老年患者导管相关性感染的危险因素[J].郑州大学学报:医学版,2011,46(4):655-656.
[14] 刘学花,吴琦.导管相关性血流感染的病原菌分布及临床特征分析[J].天津医药,2013,2(8):810-811.
[15] 邹佳楠.糖尿病患者尿路感染的危险因素及致病菌分析[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2014,23(2):179-182.
[16] Tiwari S,Pratyush DD,Gupta SK,et al. Vitamin D deficiency isassociated with inflammatory cytokine concentrations in patientswith diabetic foot infection [J]. Br J Nutr,2014,112(12):1938-1943.
[17] 张秀荣.肾病血液透析患者中心静脉导管血栓及纤维鞘形成的护理分析[J].血栓与止血学,2018,24(1):175-177.
[18] 管艮霞,王丽雅,彭文骏,等.延续性护理对临时血液透析导管发生导管相关血行感染的影响[J].全科护理,2017, 15(4):490-492.
[19] 刘尕兰.血液透析病人中心静脉导管相关性感染的护理[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2018,5(53):242-243.
[20] 李晓林.对行中心静脉置管的血液透析患者实施细节护理对其发生置管感染的影响[J].当代医药论丛,2018, 16(2):234-235. |
|
|
|