|
|
|
| Effect of oral Changzaoling combined with Chinese fumigation and washing recipe on wound healing and quality of life in patients after anal fissure surgery |
| CHEN Bin1 XU Xiantao1 CHEN Yan1 WANG Xudong2 |
1.Department of Anorectal Surgical, the First People′s Hospital of Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, Nantong 226001, China;
2.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the First People′s Hospital of Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, Nantong 226001, China |
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of oral Changzaoling combined with Chinese fumigation and washing recipe on wound healing and quality of life in patients after anal fissure surgery. Methods A total of 60 patients with anal fissure surgery admitted in the First People′s Hospital of Nantong City from January 2017 to January 2018 was selected, they were divided into control group (30 cases) and observation group (30 cases) according to random number table method. The control group was given routine treatment, and the observation group was given oral Changzaoling combined with Chinese fumigation and washing recipe on the basis of routine treatment. Both groups were treated for 2 weeks. The clinical efficacy, symptom score before and after treatment, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) score, incision healing time, hematochezia times within 2 weeks after treatment, and complication was observed and compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate was 90.00% (27/30) in the observation group, which was significantly higher than 73.33% (22/30) in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incision healing time and hematochezia times in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). After treatment, the symptom score, VAS score and PSQI score of the two groups decreased significantly after treatment, and the scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Oral Changzaoling combined with Chinese fumigation and washing recipe can obviously promote wound healing, improve clinical symptoms, enhance the quality of life, and has fewer complications, it is worthy of clinical application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 贺小迪.闭合式肛门内括约肌部分切断术在肛裂治疗中的应用[J].当代医学，2017，23（8）：117-118.
[2] 刘永臣.不同术式治疗肛裂的临床效果分析[J].临床医药文献电子杂志，2017，4（22）：4220.
[3] 许大湖，朱梅，吕浩礼.肛裂病因新解与防治心得[J].陕西中医，2002，23（11）：1055.
[4] 陈斌.肠燥灵配合手术治疗血热肠燥型肛裂120例效果观察[J].南通大学学报：医学版，2016，36（5）：476-477.
[5] 吴争光.中医辨证加薰洗治疗肛裂临床分析[J].中医临床研究，2016，8（34）89-90.
[6] 杨士伟，刘钧宁，王萌.活血洗剂熏洗治疗肛裂126例临床观察[J].中医临床研究，2014，6（9）：60-61.
[7] 中华中医药学会肛肠分会.痔、肛瘘、肛裂、直肠脱垂的诊断标准（试行草案）[J].中国肛肠病杂志，2004，24（4）：42-43.
[8] 肛裂的诊断依据、证候分类、疗效评定——中华人民共和国中医药行业标准《中医内科病证诊断疗效标准》[J].辽宁中医药大学学报，2018，20（1）：14.
[9] 视觉模拟评分法[J].临床和实验医学杂志，2013，12（23）：1925.
[10] Smyth C. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index （PSQI）[J].Insight，2000，25（3）：97-98.
[11] 郑筱萸.中药新药临床研究指导原则[M].北京：中国医药科技出版社，2002：3-4.
[12] Reddy VR，Chowdhary N，Mukunda KS，et al. Retention of resinbased filled and unfilled pit and fissure sealants：A comparative clinical study [J]. Contemp Clin Dent，2015， 6（1）：18-23.
[13] 李明，王建民，方笑丽，等.白竭散促进肛裂术后创面愈合的临床观察[J].中华中医药杂志，2017，32（6）：2811-2813.
[14] 蒋华锋，应晓江，陈洪亮.地奥司明片内服对改良肛裂切除术后疼痛和创面愈合的影响[J].中国生化药物杂志2017，3（37）：243-245.
[15] 杨佳佳，陈新静，孙建华，等.肛裂的中医药治疗概况[J].江西中医药，2015，46（11）：64-66.
[16] 黄继承.自拟止痛润肠汤治疗37例肛裂的临床效果观察[J].贵州医药，2017，41（5）：510-511.
[17] 赵斌，张志谦，吴锋.次侧切术后中药联合疗法治疗慢性肛裂的疗效分析[J].世界中西医结合杂志，2016，11（11）：1548-1552.
[18] 何瑞祥.扩肛法联合中药薰洗坐浴治疗200例早期肛裂患者的临床治疗体会[J].大家健康：中旬版，2014，8（11）：366．
[19] 朱晓秋.探讨中药熏洗法联合针灸治疗痔疮的临床效果[J].世界最新医学信息文摘，2017，17（6）：151，156.
[20] 殷玥，徐强，张朝晖.中药熏洗疗法在肛肠外科中的应用研究进展[J].中医外治杂志，2017，26（5）：50-51.
[21] 欧剑标，梁群英，肖国红.苦参汤坐浴联合复方盐酸利多卡因注射液局部注射治疗急性肛裂临床观察[J].河北中医，2018，40（4）：511-515. |
|
|
|
