|
|
Comparison of the effect of minimally invasive compression screw fixation through dorsal approach and volar approach in the treatment of scaphoid fractures |
DONG Hong HE Yang ZHANG Pingfang ZHANG Hui WANG Jianmin ZHAO Yuzhou |
The First Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of North China Petroleum Administration, Hebei Province, Renqiu 062552, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of minimally invasive compression screw internal fixation through dorsal and volar approaches in the treatment of scaphoid fracture. Methods Eighty patients with scaphoid fracture admitted to the General Hospital of North China Petroleum Administration from January 2015 to August 2017 were randomly divided into dorsal approach group (n = 40) and volar approach group (n = 40). The dorsal approach group was treated with minimally invasive compression screw internal fixation through the dorsal approach, and the volar approach group was treated with minimally invasive compression screw internal fixation through the volar approach. The follow-up period was 1 year. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was evaluated and compared. The visual analogue scores (VAS) of the two groups before operation, 6 months after operation and 1 year after operation were compared. The intraoperative blood loss and fracture healing time were compared. The complications of the two groups during the follow-up period were recorded and compared. Results The excellent rate of clinical effect in volar approach group was significantly higher than that in dorsal approach group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores of the two groups at 6 months and 1 year after operation were significantly lower than those before operation, and the VAS scores of the volar approach group at 6 months and 1 year after operation were significantly lower than those of the dorsal approach group (P < 0.05). The bleeding volume and fracture healing time of volar approach group were significantly less than those of dorsal approach group (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in volar approach group was significantly lower than that in dorsal approach group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with the dorsal approach, the volar approach with minimally invasive compression screw internal fixation for carpal scaphoid fracture has more obvious clinical effect, which can shorten the healing time of fracture, reduce pain, and has better safety.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 陈国奋,史占军.腕舟骨骨折的诊断与治疗[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2008,26(5):580-581,584.
[2] 李玉香,袁慧敏,张凯凯,等.腕舟骨骨折的诊断与治疗进展[J].中医正骨,2017,29(9):34-37,41.
[3] 唐尉尉.Acutrak螺钉微创治疗Herbert-FisherB、C型腕舟骨骨折患者的临床疗效(31例)[J].医疗装备,2017,30(20):147-148.
[4] 胡维界,洪加源.腕舟骨骨折治疗的研究进展[J].医学综述,2014,20(18):3369-3371.
[5] 何国云,张友忠,杜暠,等.微创加压螺钉固定术不同入路治疗腕舟骨骨折的疗效及安全性分析[J].创伤外科杂志,2018,20(9):670-674.
[6] 喻林波,李晓文,欧春培,等.腕桡背侧入路和腕掌侧入路治疗腕舟骨骨折对骨折愈合影响的比较[J].贵阳中医学院学报,2013,35(1):154-156.
[7] 顾玉东,王澍寰,侍德.手外科学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2002:385-386.
[8] 于鹤.空心螺钉治疗腕舟骨骨折的疗效分析[D].大连:大连医科大学,2015.
[9] 崔立舜.腕舟骨骨折与骨不连治疗现状[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2018,18(68):136-137.
[10] 张晓瑞.腕舟骨骨折的临床诊断和治疗体会[J].延安大学学报:医学科学版,2016,14(4):40-41.
[11] 左强.微创经皮Herbert螺钉内固定治疗新鲜腕舟骨骨折患者的疗效[J].医疗装备,2018,31(14):22-23.
[12] 邵宇飞.空心加压螺钉固定治疗腕舟骨骨折的手术方式及患者握力恢复情况分析[J].社区医学杂志,2017,15(18):58-59.
[13] 蒋继乐,刘波,陈山林,等.掌、背侧入路经皮加压螺钉内固定治疗急性舟骨腰部骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2016, 36(14):898-905.
[14] Gurbuz Y,Kayalar M,Bal E,et al. Comparison of dorsal and volar percutaneous screw fixation methods in acute Type B scaphoid fractures [J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2012,46(5):339-345.
[15] 徐立明,石法亮,王仁款,等.腕舟骨骨不连手术治疗16例临床分析[J].国际医药卫生导报,2015,21(7):927-930.
[16] 张昌军,戴磊,王海峰.经皮穿针Herbert空心加压螺钉内固定治疗非移位性新鲜舟骨骨折[J].中国继续医学教育,2014,6(2):22-23.
[17] 陈剑锋,刘鹏宇,杜远立,等.Herbert螺钉在舟骨骨折中的临床疗效观察[J].当代医学,2015,21(2):23-24.
[18] Faucher GK,Golden ML,Sweeney KR,et al. Comparison of screw trajectory on stability of oblique scaphoid fractures:a mechanical study [J]. J Hand Surg,2014,39(3):430-435.
[19] 张保权.掌侧入路Herbert钉内固定治疗新鲜腕舟骨骨折临床观察[J].河南外科学杂志,2015,21(2):25-26.
[20] 丁德伟.腕掌侧入路加压螺钉由腕舟骨近极向远极固定和由远极向近极固定对腕舟骨骨折的疗效比较[J].中国医药科学,2016,6(8):211-214.
[21] 喻永新,尚如国.掌侧入路与背侧入路对腕舟骨骨折愈合率的影响[J].中医正骨,2014,26(7):20-23. |
|
|
|