|
|
|
| Influence of high risk pregnancy patients by KABL model health education |
| CHANG Zheng PAN Huirong▲ LI Yan XU Jialu MA Yimei |
| Outpatient and Emergency Department, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai 201204, China |
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To approach influence of high risk pregnancy patients by KABL model health education. Methods From May 2017 to May 2018, in Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, the clinical data of 330 high risk pregnancy patients were analyzed, they were divided into control group (routine nursing measures) 170 cases and detection group (KABL model health education) 160 cases by different intervention patterns. The life quality score, social support score, anxiety score, depression score of high risk pregnancy patients in two groups before and after intervention were detected, the satisfaction degree of two groups after intervention were detected. Results The life quality score, social support score, anxiety score, depression score in two groups before intervention were compared, the difference were not statistical significance (P > 0.05); after intervention, the life quality score, social support score of two groups after intervention were higher than before intervention, anxiety score, depression score were lower than before intervention, the life quality score, social support score of detection group after intervention were higher than control group, anxiety score, depression score of detection group were lower than control group, the satisfaction degree of detection group was higher than control group, the differences were statistical significance (P < 0.05). Conclusion The application of high risk pregnancy patients by KABL model health education, which could increase life quality and social support, decrease anxiety and depression, increase satisfaction of patients, it is worth to be used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 何玉平.优质护理在高危妊娠患者产前护理中的应用效果[J].解放军预防医学杂志，2016，34（3）：246.
[2] Kaelin Agten A，Cali G，Monteagudo A，et al. The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted “on the scar”versus “in the niche”[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol，2017， 216（5）：510.e1-510.e6.
[3] 叶瑛.优质护理服务应用于高危妊娠孕妇产前护理中的效果[J].全科护理，2017，15（14）：1740-1741.
[4] Melese T，Habte D，Tsima BM，et al. High levels of post-abortion complication in a setting where abortion service is not legalized [J]. PLoS One，2017，12（1）：e0166287.
[5] 蒋歆昶，张旭，杨伟伟，等.生育政策调整对二胎孕妇高危妊娠及其妊娠结局的影响[J].中国医学创新，2017，14（28）：63-66.
[6] 高少波，徐美玲，万欣.高危妊娠患者产前综合护理干预的效果分析[J].国际医药卫生导报，2015，21（9）：1296-1298.
[7] 陈云，高玲玲，何亚，等.社会支持期望落差及喂养方式对高危妊娠产妇育儿胜任感的影响[J].护理学杂志，2018，33（2）：9-12.
[8] 杨芬，王乐霞.基于知信行理论的健康宣教对高危妊娠患者负性情绪和妊娠结局的影响[J].中国医学伦理学，2017，30（5）：605-610.
[9] 郑修霞.妇产科护理学[M].北京：人民卫生出版社，2012：110-113.
[10] 陆婷，高钰琳，张近近，等.中文版产后社会支持量表的信效度研究[J]中国实用护理杂志，2014，30（5）：26-28.
[11] 吴文源.焦虑自评量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志，1999（增刊）：235-238.
[12] 舒良.自评抑郁量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志，1999（增刊）：194-196.
[13] 张彩霞，郭学齐，兰晓红.高危妊娠孕妇产前护理需求与干预措施[J].中医药管理杂志，2016，24（12）：104-106.
[14] Wu Q，Huang LH，Xing MY，et al. Establishing nursing sensitive quality in dicators for the operating room：across sectional Delphi survey conducted in China [J]. Australian Critical Care，2017，30（1）：44-52．
[15] 朱莉姗.高危妊娠监护管理干预措施在提高剖宫产术后再次妊娠患者阴道顺产分娩中的作用与效果研究[J].中国妇幼保健，2016，31（5）：958-960.
[16] Li H，Jin D，Qiao F，et al. Relationship between the Self-rating anxiety scale score and the success rate of 64 slice computed tomography coronary angiography [J]. Int J Psychiatry Med，2016，51（1）：47-55．
[17] 王培红，李素云，程湘玮，等.高危妊娠患者疾病不确定感干预研究[J].护理学报，2017，24（22）：67-70.
[18] 宋亚琴，徐惠英，冯桂兰.产前护理干预对于高危妊娠初产妇分娩结局的影响[J].护士进修杂志，2017，32（3）：248-251.
[19] 廖太秀，肖婷婷，梁会英，等.高危妊娠管理加助产护理门诊对瘢痕子宫孕妇分娩结局的影响[J].中国医学创新，2017，14（30）：79-82.
[20] 沈彩玉，罗红仪，区小玉.产前护理干预对高危妊娠初产妇分娩结局的影响[J].临床医学工程，2017，24（9）：1299-1300. |
|
|
|
