|
|
|
| Evaluation value of immature granulocytes combined with SOFA score on prognosis in patients with sepsis |
| GUO Junchuan Mutalifu·Maihemuti XIAO Dong |
| The Second Department of Critical Care Medicine, People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830000, China |
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To evaluate the value of immature granulocytes combined with sepsis related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score in the prognosis of patients with sepsis. Methods From October 2016 to December 2017, 88 patients with sepsis who were treated in People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. After 28 days of observation, the patients were divided into survival group and death group. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHEⅡ) score, SOFA score, clinical parameters related to disease severity, and procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), absolute value of immature granulocytes (IG#) and percentage of immature granulocytes (IG%) at admission were compared between the two groups. The ROC curve was used to compare IG#, IG%, SOFA score, and the value of combined detection in predicting the prognosis of sepsis. Results There were 56 cases in the final survival group and 32 cases in the death group. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in APACHEⅡ score, SOFA score, septic shock, mechanical ventilation, mechanical ventilation time, vasoactive drugs and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (all P ＜ 0.05). IG% and IG# were positively correlated with SOFA scores (r = 0.630, 0.574, all P ＜ 0.001). ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of SOFA was significantly larger than IG# and IG%. The AUC of SOFA score combined with IG# and IG% was significantly larger than any other single indicator. Conclusion The immature granulocyte is a useful index to predict the prognosis of sepsis patients. Immature granulocytes combined with SOFA score detection has a higher sensitivity and specificity for the assessment of poor prognosis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Giannakopoulos K，Hoffmann U，Ansari U，et al. The Use of Biomarkers in Sepsis：A Systematic Review [J]. Curr Pharm Biotechnol，2017，18（6）：499-507.
[2] Vijayan AL，Vanimaya，Ravindran S，et al. Procalcitonin:a promising diagnostic marker for sepsis and antibiotic therapy [J]. J Intensive Care，2017，15（5）：51.
[3] Lanziotti VS，Póvoa P，Prata-Barbosa A，et al. Patterns of C-reactive protein ratio response to antibiotics in pediatric sepsis：A prospective cohort study [J]. J Crit Care，2017， 44（3）：217-222.
[4] Barre M，Behnes M，Hamed S，et al. Revisiting the prognostic value of monocyte chemotactic protein 1 and interleukin-6 in the sepsis-3 era [J]. J Crit Care，2017，43（3）：21-28.
[5] Troìa R，Agnoli C，Calipa S，et al. Evaluation of the delta neutrophil index from an automated blood cell analyser in septic dogs [J]. Vet J，2017，230（15）：13-19.
[6] Goag EK，Lee JW，Roh YH，et al. A Simplified Mortality Score Using Delta Neutrophil Index and the Thrombotic Microangiopathy Score for Prognostication in Critically Ill Patients [J]. Shock，2018，49（1）：39-43.
[7] Kim JW，Park JH，Kim DJ，et al. The delta neutrophil index is a prognostic factor for postoperative mortality in patients with sepsiscaused by peritonitis [J]. PLoS One，2017， 12（8）：e0182325.
[8] 汪颖，王迪芬，付江泉，等.SOFA、qSOFA评分和传统指标对脓毒症预后的判断价值[J].中华危重病急救医学，2017，29（8）：700-704.
[9] Seymour CW，Liu VX，Iwashyna TJ，et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock（Sepsis-3）[J]. JAMA，2016，315（8）：762-774.
[10] Abdelmalik PA，Stevens RD，Singh S，et al. Anti-aging factor，serum alpha-Klotho，as a marker of acute physiological stress，and a predictor of ICU mortality，in patients with septic shock [J]. J Crit Care，2017，44（2）：323-330.
[11] Yang CJ，Huang TS，Lee TL，et al. Serum Glutamine Levels as a Potential Diagnostic Biomarker in Sepsis following Surgery forPeritonitis [J]. Chin J Physiol，2017，60（6）：15.
[12] 马科，左路广，冯博，等.成人外周血未成熟粒细胞正常参考值的建立与临床应用[J].广东医学，2017，38（21）：3280-3282.
[13] 郭平，陈骊婷，宋卫星，等.快速流式细胞术用于外周血原始细胞检测性能临床评价[J].检验医学，2017，32（5）：421-426.
[14] 余文辉，周小梅，王晓忠，等.未成熟粒细胞计数在全身炎症反应综合征中的应用价值[J].中国危重病急救医学，2009，21（9）：558-559.
[15] Karon BS，Tolan NV，Wockenfus AM，et al. Evaluation of lactate，white blood cell count，neutrophil count，procalcitonin and immaturegranulocyte count as biomarkers for sepsis in emergency department patients [J]. Clin Biochem，2017，50（16）：956-958.
[16] Kim H，Kim Y，Lee HK，et al. Comparison of the delta neutrophil index with procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in sepsis [J]. Clin Lab，2014，60（12）：2015-2021.
[17] Hwang YJ，Chung SP，Park YS，et al. Newly designed delta neutrophil index-to-serum albumin ratio prognosis of early mortality in severe sepsis [J]. Am J Emerg Med，2015，33（11）：1577-1582.
[18] Park SH，Ha SO，Cho YU，et al. Immature platelet fraction in septic patients：clinical relevance of immature platelet fraction is limited to the sensitive and accurate discrimination of septic patients from non-septic patients，not to the discrimination of sepsis severity [J]. Ann Lab Med，2016，36（1）：1-8.
[19] Khwannimit B，Bhurayanontachai R，Vattanavanit V，et al. Comparison of the performance of SOFA，qSOFA and SIRS for predicting mortality and organ failure among sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit in a middle-income country [J]. J Crit Care，2017，44（2）：156-160.
[20] 吴晓弟，陈玉冰，吴翔，等.早期连续性肾脏替代治疗严重脓毒症患者的效果研究[J].中国医药导报，2017，14（14）：99-102.
[21] 顾鑫亮.快速序贯器官衰竭评分对肺炎致脓毒症诊断及预后价值的研究[J].当代医学，2017，23（25）：46-48.
[22] Ramos JGR，da Hora Passos R，Teixeira MB，et al. Prognostic ability of quick-SOFA across different age groups of patients with suspected infection outside the intensive care unit：A cohort study [J]. J Crit Care，2018，47（3）：178-184.
[23] 刘明双，彭芳，杨昆，等.脓毒症患者血清PCT水平与APACHEⅡ、SOFA评分相关性及其预后评估[J].中外医学研究，2018，16（2）：28-30. |
|
|
|
