|
|
|
| Comparison of the application effect of iRoot SP and AH Plus root canal sealer in the root canal treatment of refractory anterior periapical disease |
| LIU Man YU Ling GAO Yaojie CHANG E DONG Kaili |
| Department of Stomatology, Changzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province, Changzhou 213000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To compare the application of iRoot SP and AH Plus root canal sealer in the root canal treatment of refractory anterior periapical disease. Methods A total of 112 patients with refractory anterior periapical disease (single affected tooth) who received root canal treatment in the Department of Stomatology, Changzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province from February 2021 to February 2022 were selected and they were divided into iRoot SP group (56 cases) and AH Plus group (56 cases) according to random number table method. iRoot SP group was treated with iRoot SP root canal sealer, and AH Plus group was treated with AH Plus root canal sealer. The quality of root canal filling was compared between the two groups, the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were compared between the two groups before treatment and one week after treatment, and the periapical index (PAI) was compared between the two groups before treatment and six months after treatment, and the efficacy of the two groups was evaluated. Results The filling rate of iRoot SP group was higher than that of AH Plus group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). One week after treatment, VAS scores of the two groups were lower than those before treatment, and those of iRoot SP group were lower than those of AH Plus group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). At six months after treatment, PAI in two groups was lower than those before treatment, and those of iRoot SP group were lower than those of AH Plus group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). The curative effect of iRoot SP group was better than that of AH Plus group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Compared with AH Plus root canal sealer, iRoot SP root canal sealer can improve the quality of root canal filling, relieve pain, promote disease recovery, and improve the therapeutic effect when applied in the root canal treatment of refractory anterior periapical disease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 邹林洪，张琳林，邵春婷，等.MTAD与洗必泰联合超声荡洗根管治疗难治性根尖周炎的效果比较[J].海南医学，2021，32（5）：639-641.
[2] Karamifar K，Tondari A，Saghiri MA. Endodontic Periapical Lesion：An Overview on the Etiology，Diagnosis and Current Treatment Modalities [J]. Eur Endod J，2020，5（2）：54-67.
[3] 杨光，霍峰，尹雪莲，等.MTA、iRoot BP Plus在难治性前牙根尖周病患者根管治疗中的应用比较[J].中国现代医学杂志，2021，31（4）：81-85.
[4] Wu L，Xue K，Hu G，et al. Effects of iRoot SP on osteogenic differentiation of human stem cells from apical papilla [J]. BMC Oral Health，2021，21（1）：407.
[5] 仇晓慧，张福裕，徐海.不同充填技术对iRoot SP充填根管的根尖封闭性能的影响[J].中国医师杂志，2020，22（5）：723-726，730.
[6] Crozeta BM，Lopes FC，Menezes Silva R，et al. Retreatability of BC Sealer and AH Plus root canal sealers using new supplementary instrumentation protocol during non-surgical endodontic retreatment [J]. Clin Oral Investig，2021，25（3）：891- 899.
[7] 徐高旭.AH Plus糊剂根管充填联合米诺环素缓释剂治疗逆行性牙髓炎的效果[J].临床医学，2021，41（2）：70- 72.
[8] 樊明文.牙体牙髓病学[M].北京：人民卫生出版社，2013：306-307.
[9] 中华口腔医学会牙体牙髓病学专业委员会.根管治疗技术指南[J].中华口腔医学杂志，2014，49（5）：272-274.
[10] 严广斌.视觉模拟评分法[J].中华关节外科杂志：电子版，2014，8（2）：1.
[11] Estrela C，Bueno MR，Azevedo BC，et al. A new periapical index based on cone beam computed tomography [J]. J Endod，2008，34（11）：1325-1331.
[12] Di Murro B，Papi P，Di Murro C，et al. Correlation between endodontic pulpal/periapical disease and retrograde peri- implantitis：A case series [J]. Aust Endod J，2021，47（2）： 358-364.
[13] 肖文，史文涛，汪俊.炎性活髓保存在年轻恒牙不可逆性牙髓炎及根尖周炎治疗中的应用[J].中华口腔医学杂志，2022，57（3）：287-291.
[14] 马依热·阿布都赛麦提，玛衣努尔·艾赛题，陈晓涛.基于放射特征的难治性根尖周炎治疗失败LASSO回归分析[J].河北医学，2022，28（10）：1706-1711.
[15] 刘樱，李阳，丁小玲.不同根管倒充填材料对慢性根尖周炎显微根尖手术效果的影响[J].成都医学院学报，2021，16（3）：303-306.
[16] 孙莉青，郭宜青，杨爱华，等.3种根管充填方法对不同类型根管根尖封闭性的影响研究[J].国际口腔医学杂志，2021，48（6）：629-634.
[17] 张梦葩，董潇，高菲，等.改良根管治疗对牙髓病或根尖周病患者根管预备和充填质量的影响[J].海南医学，2020，31（22）：2946-2949.
[18] 兰宁宁.AH Plus糊剂超填对牙髓炎根管治疗术后短期疗效的影响[J].中国现代药物应用，2019，13（21）：27-28.
[19] 杨芬，任英华，魏晓霞，等.生物陶瓷材料iROOT SP糊剂用于根管充填的效果观察[J].海南医学，2020，31（6）：757-759.
[20] 吕翱，林晓新，郭晓莉，等.三种根管封闭剂的根尖封闭性能体外比较研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志，2022，15（3）：300-303.
[21] 陈燕，黄正蔚，张彭飞.AH plus和iRoot SP用于热牙胶充填的根尖封闭性能研究[J].口腔材料器械杂志，2021， 30（1）：13-17.
[22] 王晓颖，王艳华，王变红.三种根管封闭剂结合热牙胶垂直加压技术治疗牙髓病的疗效观察[J].河北医学，2023，29（4）：647-652.
[23] 高萍，王月秋.冷侧压法、垂直加压法及iRoot SP糊剂单尖法的根管充填疗效评价[J].中国医药科学，2021，11（20）：224-227，236.
[24] Wu X，Yan M，Lu J，et al. iRoot SP Promotes Osteo/Odontogenesis of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells via Activation of NF-κB and MAPK Signaling Pathways [J]. Stem Cells Int，2020，24（20）：6673467.
[25] 钟旭，赵燕翔.一次性根管治疗术中应用iRootSP材料封闭根管治疗牙髓炎的临床疗效[J].医学临床研究，2020，37（6）：923-924.
[26] Paz JER，Costa PO，Souza AAC，et al. Bone repair in defects filled with AH Plus sealer and different concentrations of MTA：a study in rat tibiae [J]. Restor Dent Endod，2021， 46（4）：e48.
[27] Yang R，Tian J，Huang X，et al. A comparative study of dentinal tubule penetration and the retreatability of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow，iRoot SP，and AH Plus with different obturation techniques [J]. Clin Oral Investig，2021， 25（6）：4163-4173.
[28] 尹秋蓉，张旭凤，吴芸菲.热牙胶垂直加压法与iRoot SP冷侧压法行C形根管充填治疗恒牙根尖周炎疗效及对疼痛和预后的影响[J].河北医学，2022，28（6）：983- 988.
[29] 高萍，王月秋，游冬冬，等.Reciproc单支锉清除iRoot SP糊剂单尖法根管充填材料的再治疗效率研究[J].中国医药科学，2023，13（14）：157-161.
[30] 石洁，曲兴民，尚佳健.iRoot SP根尖封闭剂的疗效评价的Meta分析[J].北京口腔医学，2021，29（5）：303-308.
[31] 柯建国，王飞翔，李文进，等.iRoot SP辅助单尖充填技术治疗牙髓根尖周病的效果[J].中外医学研究，2021， 19（31）：152-155.
[32] 苏红亮，张亚平，张平，等.iRoot SP冷侧压法在恒牙根尖周炎根管填充中的应用效果及对牙周指标的影响[J].中国医学创新，2023，20（11）：1-5.
[33] 张福裕，仇晓慧，章非敏，等.iRoot SP直接充填后与牙本质壁粘结强度的临床初探[J].口腔医学，2020，40（5）：437-442. |
|
|
|
