|
|
|
| Satisfaction and its influencing factors of clinical epidemiology teaching effect of medical graduate students in military school based on the training goal of “Four Hui” |
| CHEN Qiao LI Qiongxuan ZHANG Xin LUAN Hengyu SONG Yujian SUN Yuanyuan SAI Xiaoyong |
Teaching and Research Section of Statistics and Epidemiology, the Graduate School of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objectives To explore the satisfaction degree and its influencing factors of teaching effect of clinical epidemiology course for medical graduate students in military school based on the training goal of “Four Hui”. Methods A total of 178 medical postgraduates who participated in the clinical epidemiology course based on the training goal of “Four Hui” in the autumn semester of the Graduate School of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital in December 2021 were selected as research objects. Online questionnaires were distributed to them about the importance of the course, the reasons affecting the teaching effect, the teaching satisfaction, and the factors influencing the teaching satisfaction, and the teaching effect was analyzed. Further, binary logistic regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of clinical epidemiology teaching effect based on “Four Hui” training goal. Results A total of 178 questionnaires were sent out in this study, and 160 valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 90%. There were statistically significant differences between doctoral students and master students in course interest, course teaching satisfaction, course learning difficulty, number of articles published since admission, and number of articles published in the past one year (P＜0.05). The proportion of doctoral students who considered “1 history of epidemiology”, and “7 epidemiology of infectious diseases” important were higher than those of master students, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). The proportion of doctoral students who thought that “R1 too much information in each class” was the reason affecting the teaching effect was lower than that of master students, and the proportion of doctoral students who thought that “R3 clinical epidemiology foundation is too poor” and “R4 is not reviewed in time” were the reason affecting the teaching effect were higher than those of master students, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). Age, whether to apply for national entrance examination, “S1 degree of interest in the course”, “S2 cognition of the importance of the course”, “S5 role in clinical research or academic study”, “S6 degree of satisfaction with the course”, “S11 interest in the overall teaching content”, and “S12 wants to increase or reduce the number of hours” were all influencing factors of graduate students’ satisfaction with the teaching of clinical epidemiology courses (P＜0.05). The results of multi-factor analysis showed that age, whether to apply for national entrance examination, “S2 cognition of the importance of the course”, and “S6 degree of satisfaction with the course” were independent influencing factors of graduate students’ satisfaction with the teaching of clinical epidemiology courses (P＜0.05). Conclusion The teaching of clinical epidemiology should be further improved in the medical education of military schools, and targeted teaching should be carried out according to the age of the students, whether to apply for national entrance examination, the degree of emphasis on the course, and the learning ability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 黄悦勤.临床流行病学[M].北京：人民卫生出版社，2020：1.
[2] 付长金，王萍玉.医学硕士研究生临床流行病学认知及教学需求调查[J].医学教育研究与实践，2018，26（2）：250-254.
[3] 王春梅，黄民主，周价，等.《临床流行病学》教学改革对临床医学硕士研究生创新能力的影响[J].湖南中医药大学学报，2012，32（4）：56-58.
[4] 王欣，王铭，赵峻，等.北京协和医学院超声诊断教学需求的问卷调查及反馈分析[J].基础医学与临床，2021，41（3）：452-455.
[5] Cheng HM，Guo FR，Hsu TF. Two strategies to intensify evidence-based medicine education of undergraduate students：a randomised controlled trial [J]. Ann Acad Med Singap，2012， 41（1）：4-11.
[6] 赛晓勇，门可，王波.某军医大学本科生流行病学课程全英文教学效果的调查报告[J].西北医学教育，2006，14（5）：554-555.
[7] 戴江红，田恬，阿达力别克.MOOC背景下案例教学与翻转课堂相结合的流行病学教学改革研究[J].新疆医科大学学报，2019，42（1）：134-136.
[8] Gehlbach SH，Farrow SC，Fowkes FG，et al. Epidemiology for medical students: a controlled trial of three teaching methods [J]. Int J Epidemiol，1985，14（1）：178-181.
[9] Evans KH，Thompson AC，O’Brien C，et al. An Innovative Blended Preclinical Curriculum in Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics：Impact on Student Satisfaction and Performance [J]. Acad Med，2016，91（5）：696-700.
[10] Seifert T，Becker T，Büttcher AF，et al. Restructuring the clinical curriculum at University Medical Center G?觟ttingen：effects of distance teaching on students’satisfaction and learning outcome [J]. GMS J Med Educ，2021，38（1）：Doc1.
[11] Rota M，Peveri G，Fanelli M，et al. Satisfaction with online teaching of medical statistics during the COVID-19 pandemic：A survey by the Education Committee of the Italian Society of Medical Statistics and Clinical Epidemiology [J]. Teach Stat，2021，34：129-139.
[12] Kidane HH，Roebertsen H，van der Vleuten CPM. Students’perceptions towards self-directed learning in Ethiopian medical schools with new innovative curriculum：a mixed- method study [J]. BMC Medical Educ，2020，20（1）：7.
[13] 马菲，王建华.TBL教学模式在流行病学教学中的初步应用[J].中国高等医学教育，2014（2）：57-58.
[14] Baig M，Gazzaz ZJ，Farouq M. Blended Learning：The impact of blackboard formative assessment on the final marks and students’perception of its effectiveness [J]. Pak J Med Sci，2020，36（3）：327-332.
[15] 王萍玉，贾改珍，吕鹏，等.Sandwich教学理念在流行病学案例教学中的应用[J].基础医学教育，2017，19（2）：114- 116.
[16] 胡静，马菲.“三明治”教学方法在流行病学教学中应用的探讨[J].中华医学教育杂志，2017，37（5）：683-686.
[17] 李雪莲，任仰武，吴伟，等.加强流行病学课程师生互动的实施策略探讨[J].基础医学教育，2021，23（12）：842-845.
[18] 杜宏伟，赛晓勇.陕西省286例军校医学硕士生英语统考成绩影响因素的分析[J].西北医学教育（增刊），2010， 18（5）：80-82.
[19] Bac M，Bergh AM，Etsane ME，et al. Medical education and the quality improvement spiral：A case study from Mpum- alanga，South Africa [J]. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med，2015，7（1）：738.
[20] Al-Azri H，Ratnapalan S. Problem-based learning in continuing medical education：review of randomized controlled trials [J]. Can Fam Physician，2014，60（2）：157-165.
[21] Zhang G，Wu H，Xie A，et al. The association between medical student research engagement with learning outcomes [J]. Med Educ Online，2022，27（1）：2100039.
[22] Padilha JM，Machado PP，Ribeiro AL，et al. Easiness，usefulness and intention to use a MOOC in nursing [J]. Nurse Educ Today，2021，97：104705.
[23] O’Brien BC，Zapata J，Chang A，et al. Bridging medical education goals and health system outcomes：An instrumental case study of pre-clerkship students’improvement projects [J]. Perspect Med Educ，2022，11（4）：179-186.
[24] French H，Arias-Shah A，Gisondo C，et al. Perspectives：The Flipped Classroom in Graduate Medical Education [J]. Neoreviews，2020，21（3）：e150-e156.
[25] Vanka A，Vanka S，Wali O. Flipped classroom in dental education：A scoping review [J]. Eur J Dent Educ，2020，24（2）： 213-226.
[26] Benè KL，Bergus G. When learners become teachers：a review of peer teaching in medical student education [J]. Fam Med，2014，46（10）：783-787.
[27] Erlich DR，Shaughnessy AF. Student-teacher education programme（STEP）by step：transforming medical students into competent，confident teachers [J]. Med Teach，2014，36（4）：322-332.
[28] Burgess A，Bleasel J，Haq I，et al. Team-based learning（TBL）in the medical curriculum：better than PBL？[J]. BMC Med Educ，2017，17（1）：243.
[29] Whitmill A，Edwards T，Charles S. Training Medical Student Facilitators of Peer-Assisted Study Sessions Using an Objective Standardized Teaching Exercise [J]. MedEdPORTAL，2020，16：10898.
[30] Rudinsky SL，Spalding C，Conley SP，et al. The development，implementation，and evaluation of a medical student peer teaching training curriculum during a high-fidelity prehospital trauma simulation [J]. AEM Educ Train，2022，6（4）：e10782.
[31] 赛晓勇，宋玉健，孙媛媛.解放军医学院2016-2019级研究生临床试验授课效果的纵向比较[J].中国医药导报，2019，16（35）：178-181.
[32] 赛晓勇，石锦浩，宋玉健.不同层次军校学员临床试验授课效果的横断面调查[J].中国医药导报，2020，17（10）： 74-77. |
|
|
|
