|
|
Risk analysis of low anterior resection syndrome after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer |
HUANG Junjie1 ZHENG Weiqing1 WANG Zhaohui2 REN Jian1▲ |
1.Department of Gastroenterology, Huangshan People’s Hospital, Anhui Province, Huangshan 245000, China;
2.Department of Gastroenterology, Anqing First People’s Hospital, Anhui Province, Anqing 246004, China
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To analyze the risk of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods A total of 80 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer in Huangshan People’s Hospital Anhui Province from June 2017 to January 2020 and were followed up for 24 months were selected as the study subjects. Patients were divided into LARS group and non-LARS group according to whether or not occurred LARS after surgery. Clinical data of patients were collected to analyze the related factors that may affect the occurrence of LARS in patients after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, and the risk factors were identified by logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 80 patients followed up for 24 months, 49 (61.25%) of the patients with LARS were the LARS group, and 31 (38.75%) of the patients without LARS were the non-LARS group. Univariate analysis showed that the anastomotic distance from stamo to anus in the LARS group was shorter than the non-LARS group (P<0.05), and the proportion of body mass index (BMI)>25 kg/cm2 in the LARS group was higher than that in the non-LARS group (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that BMI>25 kg/cm2 (OR=2.385, 95%CI: 1.875, 2.895), anastomotic distance from the anus (OR=0.321, 95%CI:-0.381, 1.023) were risk factors for LARS in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer (P<0.05). Conclusion BMI and the anastomotic distance from stoma to anus are important influencing factors for LARS in patients with rectal cancer after operation, and the risk of LARS is high. Identifying risk factors is helpful for clinical selection of scientific surgical methods and reduction of LARS incidence.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 韩方海,钟广宇.直肠癌全直肠系膜切除手术中保护盆腔自主神经的技术路径[J].临床外科杂志,2020,28(5):412-415.
[2] 蔡建,王磊.回眸2018——聚焦结直肠癌研究领域[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2019,22(1):9-16.
[3] Li J,Xiong Y,Yang G,et al. Complete laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: technical aspects and long-term results from a single center [J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne,2021,16(1):62-75.
[4] 理纪,周世云.低位直肠癌患者腹腔镜辅助经肛全直肠系膜切除术术后排便功能观察及其相关影响因素分析[J].实用癌症杂志,2022,37(3):471-473.
[5] 樊鹏,徐红丽,王凯,等.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术治疗结直肠癌的临床效果及其对胃肠功能的影响[J].中国医药科学,2021,11(12):170-173.
[6] Keane C,Fearnhead NS,Bordeianou LG,et al. LARS International Collaborative Group. International Consensus Definition of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome [J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2020,63(3):274-284.
[7] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版)[J].中华外科杂志,2020,58(8):561- 585.
[8] 马明星,丛进春,陈春生,等.低位直肠癌经内外括约肌间切除术后的低前综合征评分[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2016,23(10):1225-1230.
[9] 夏志刚,甘志明,向立历,等.NLR和PLR与结直肠癌患者TNM分期及预后的相关性研究[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2017,24(8):963-969.
[10] Stanzione A,Verde F,Romeo V,et al. Radiomics and machine learning applications in rectal cancer: Current update and future perspectives [J]. World J Gastroenterol,2021,27(32):5306-5321.
[11] 周仕海,陈宏,雒洪志.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术保留左结肠动脉的安全性及近期疗效评价[J].中国医药科学,2022, 12(10):144-148.
[12] Nicotera A,Falletto E,Arezzo A,et al. Risk factors for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer [J]. Surg Endosc,2022,36(8):6059-6066.
[13] 陈艳玲,黄玉莲,罗琳,等.直肠癌切除术患者永久性与临时性造口术后生活质量变化及其与排便症状的相关性研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2021,21(18):3559- 3563,3519.
[14] 高庚妹,陈兰,唐和春,等.机器人与腹腔镜直肠癌根治术治疗超重和肥胖患者的疗效对比分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2021,24(1):68-74.
[15] 侯文运,肖毅.对中低位直肠癌根治手术中“困难骨盆”的认识和思考[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2022,25(3):214- 218.
[16] 吴胜伟,吴晓翔,王志伟.保留盆腔自主神经的腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术对女性直肠癌患者术后复发及排尿和性生活质量的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2022,39(6):519-522.
[17] 杨丹,李丽,邵丽.腹腔镜下系统保留盆腔自主神经的直肠癌根治术的近期疗效及对患者术后排尿、胃肠功能影响[J].实用癌症杂志,2020,35(5):819-824.
[18] 许博,张颖.基于肛门直肠测压探究功能性磁刺激对脊髓损伤后神经源性肠道的改善效果[J].国际生物医学工程杂志,2021,44(4):286-290.
[19] Melka D,Leiritz E,Labiad C,et al. Delayed pull-through coloanal anastomosis without temporary stoma: an alternative to the standard manual side-to-end coloanal anastomosis with temporary stoma? A comparative study in 223 patients with low rectal cancer [J]. Colorectal Dis,2022,24(5):587-593.
[20] 郭贞.微创腹腔镜低位直肠癌保肛术后导致吻合口瘘的原因分析与预防措施[J].实用癌症杂志,2019,34(4):661-664.
[21] Sürek A,Bozkurt MA,Gemici E,et al. Treatment of Anastomotic Leaks With EndoVac After Low Anterior Resection in Colorectal Cancers [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2021,31(4):492-496.
[22] 刘帅峰,李文献,梅志彪,等.结肠癌根治术吻合口瘘并发腹腔感染引流液病原菌分布、耐药性及风险预测模型建立[J].实用癌症杂志,2022,37(7):1128-1132.
[23] Sandberg S,Asplund D,Bisgaard T,et al. Low anterior resection syndrome in a Scandinavian population of patients with rectal cancer:a longitudinal follow-up within the QoLiRECT study[J]. Colorectal Dis,2020,22(10):1367- 1378.
[24] 金鑫,黄勇,刘维高.保留左结肠动脉对直肠癌腹腔镜根治术患者排尿和排便影响的meta分析[J].重庆医学,2021,50(20):3536-3540.
[25] 徐晓华,吴霞,李可欣,等.张青教授基于“肺与大肠相表里”的直肠癌前切除综合征的治疗经验[J].世界中医药,2019,14(12):3329-3332.
[26] 龚熙,陆叶青,吴秀芳,等.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者并发症影响因素分析[J].中国医药导报,2023,20(17):123-126.
[27] 黄海霞,杨邦翠,范雨诗.直肠癌术后低位前切除综合征的研究进展[J].中国医药科学,2021,11(20):46-49. |
|
|
|