基于C6、C7路径星状神经节阻滞超声参数研究及临床价值

doi:10.20047/j.issn1673-72102023.25.34

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (26)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (934 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical application value of stellate ganglion block (SGB) based on C6 and C7 transverse process approach. Methods A total of 108 healthy subjects who underwent cervical ultrasound examination in Wuhu Hospital Affiliated to East China Normal University from June 2021 to November 2022 were selected, ultrasonic data of C6 and C7 transverse process simulated puncture were recorded. Forty-five patients with ultrasound-guided SGB in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College from August 2021 to October 2022 were selected as the study objects, the patient received SGB based on C6 and C7 transversal process approach. The puncture success rate, SGB success rate, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and related complications of different approaches were compared. Results There were no significant differences between the left and right of C6 transverse process in the distance from anterior tubercle to carotid artery, the distance from anterior tubercle to jugular vein, and the distance from longus cervical muscle to vagus nerve (P＞0.05). There was no significant difference between the left and right of C7 transverse process in the distance from vertebral vein to carotid artery, the distance from vertebral vein to jugular vein, and the distance from longus cervical muscle to vagus nerve (P＞0.05). The width of the artery window, the width of the vein window, and the distance from longus cervical muscle to vagus nerve in C7 transversal process approach were longer than those in C6 transversal process approach; the proportion of arterial window width＜5 mm and venous window width ＜5 mm on C7 transversal process approach were lower than those on C6 transversal process approach, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). Successful puncture through different approaches and Horner’s syndrome was occurred. The puncture success rate of C7 transversal process was higher than that of C6 transversal process, and the VAS score was lower than that of C6 transversal process, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in hoarseness rate among different approaches (P＞0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided SGB through C7 transverse process approach is more valuable than C6 transverse process approach, and is worth popularizing.

Key words： Stellate ganglion block Ultrasound-guided C6 transverse process C7 transverse process

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHU Xiaoai1 WANG Junli1 HU Aili1 LU Dasheng2 XIA Qinzhong2▲

Cite this article:

CHU Xiaoai1 WANG Junli1 HU Aili1 LU Dasheng2 XIA Qinzhong2▲. Study of ultrasound parameters and clinical value of stellate ganglion block based on C6 and C7 pathway[J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(25): 156-159,163.

URL:

https://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/EN/10.20047/j.issn1673-72102023.25.34 OR https://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/EN/Y2023/V20/I25/156

[1] 李颖，刘占矿，赵自刚.星状神经节阻滞改善老年人术后认知功能障碍的作用[J].中国老年学杂志，2021，41（11）：2448-2451.
[2] 刘艳伟，孟爱霞，于瑞杰，等.星状神经节阻滞联合度洛西汀治疗交感神经型颈椎病的临床观察[J].中国疼痛医学杂志，2022，28（11）：834-838
[3] 皇甫媛媛，韩志强.星状神经节阻滞的心肌保护作用及机制[J].河北医药，2022，44（8）：1237-1242.
[4] 金璐薇，邹学军.星状神经节阻滞用于疾病治疗的研究进展[J].中华麻醉学杂志，2022，42（6）：766-768.
[5] 王慧颖，李红亮，王保国.星状神经节阻滞治疗偏头痛的有效性及安全性分析及其对头颈部动脉血流动力学的影响[J].中国医药导报，2017，14（21）：25-28.
[6] 严敏，刘小立，王林，等.星状神经节阻滞疗法中国专家共识（2022版）[J].中华疼痛学杂志，2022，18（3）：293-301.
[7] 李小雨，姜玉玉，古翠方，等.超声引导下星状神经节阻滞加快胃癌根治术患者术后胃肠功能恢复[J].南方医科大学学报，2022，42（2）：300-304.
[8] 赵月，韩丽，赵李红，等.超声引导下星状神经节阻滞对胸腔镜单肺通气患者的肺保护作用[J].大连医科大学学报，2022，44（6）：495-503.
[9] 郭辉，张志军，杨立强.超声引导下选择性颈神经根阻滞联合中频电疗治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].中国介入影像与治疗学，2022，19（4）：193-196.
[10] 王明珠，刘祯庆，徐艳.超声引导下收肌管阻滞与传统静脉给药对胫骨骨折切开复位内固定术后的镇痛效果比较[J].中国医药导报，2022，19（4）：111-114.
[11] 夏秦仲，赵月雷，鲁大胜.对比超声引导下经C6与C7横突平面入路星状神经节阻滞的有效性和安全性[J].中国介入影像与治疗学，2023，20（1）：28-31.
[12] Park DY，Kang S，Kang HJ，et al. Impact of Neck Position on the Probability of Common Carotid Artery Puncture During Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Block [J]. PM R，2019，11（5）：463-469.
[13] 徐佳佳，章壮云，胡建，等.超声引导下单侧星状神经节阻滞预防胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术后心律失常的效果[J].中国现代手术学杂志，2022，26（1）：56-60.
[14] 裴有铭，刘卫锋.超声引导C7星状神经节阻滞对全麻围拔管期血流动力学的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志，2021，38（2）：204-208.
[15] 刘庆华，周余旺，刘雪平，等.术中超声引导下罗哌卡因星状神经节阻滞在腹腔镜规则性肝切除术中的应用价值[J].浙江医学，2021，43（3）：310-313.
[16] 王武涛，赵俊莺，韩彬，等.超声引导下颈7平面0.15%罗哌卡因星状神经节阻滞的有效剂量分析[J].临床超声医学杂志，2018，20（4）：264-266.
[17] 白志勇，刘芳，栾好梅，等.对比超声引导下经前斜角肌与经颈静脉行星状神经节阻滞的有效性及安全性[J].中国医学影像技术，2019，35（8）：1151-1154.
[18] 刘稳柱.颈内静脉CT三维应用解剖研究及其临床意义[J].中国继续医学教育，2018，10（24）：156-157.
[19] 陈小彬，江榕，范祖友，等.中心静脉穿刺置管术后发生严重并发症的临床分析[J].血管与腔内血管外科杂志，2022，8（8）：921-925.
[20] 陈泉，陈跃鑫，戴向晨，等.静脉外科热点问题解析[J].中国实用外科杂志，2022，42（12）：1321-1342.
[21] 李和珂，李晓琴，曾瑜，等.减轻静脉穿刺疼痛方法的研究进展[J].局解手术学杂志，2020，29（3）：246-250.
[22] 李宇，马虹.超声引导星状神经节阻滞对患者全身麻醉期间血流动力学的影响[J].中国医科大学学报，2018， 47（12）：1093-1097.
[23] 查晓亮，王进，罗奇，等.超声引导下间断给药星状神经节阻滞术效果和并发症[J].中国介入影像与治疗学，2022， 19（9）：556-559.
[24] 穆强，柴俊龙，吕宏林，等.星状神经节阻滞术治疗带状疱疹后神经痛临床效果及安全性的meta分析[J].中国医药导报，2022，19（19）：103-106.
[25] 付美娟，温稀超，靳小石.颈部筋膜的解剖学认识及临床应用研究进展[J].现代肿瘤医学，2022，30（13）：2464- 2470.
[26] 侯佳欣，王玲，胡国华.咽旁间隙肿瘤手术径路及其应用解剖[J].中华解剖与临床杂志，2020，25（1）：88-92.