|
|
Comparison of the effect of different management methods of drainage tube in knee osteoarthritis after total knee arthroplasty#br# |
FU Dongliang HUANG Yuanxia |
Department of Joint and Trauma Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Henan Province, Xinxiang 453000, China
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of different management methods of drainage tube in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) after total knee arthrplasty (TKA). Methods A total of 96 patients with KOA treated with TKA admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University from October 2020 to June 2022 were selected and they were divided into three groups according to random number table method, with 32 cases in each group. No drainage tube was placed during TKA in group A. In group B, the drainage tube was placed during TKA operation, and the drainage was continued after two hours of early clamping. In group C, the drainage tube was placed during the TKA operation, which was clamped intermittently for 110 minutes every two hours and opened for 10 minutes until six hours later. Preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb), hematopoiesis (HCT), pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, circumference of affected limb, range of motion (ROM) of knee joint, postoperative drainage volume, total blood loss, and complications were recorded. Results After operation, the Hb and HCT of the three groups were lower than those before operation, and those of group B were lower than group A and group C (P<0.05). After operation, the VAS scores of the three groups were lower than those before operation, and the circumference of the affected limb in the three groups were longer than those before operation, and the VAS scores of group B and group C were lower than those of group A, and the circumference of the affected limb of group B and group C were shorter than those of group A (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in total blood loss among the three groups (P>0.05); the postoperative drainage volume of group C was less than that of group B, with statistically significant (P<0.05). There were significant differences in ROM time, between groups and interaction among the three groups (P<0.05). Intra-group comparison: the ROM of the three groups at each time point was compared, (P<0.05). Comparison between groups: the ROM of group B and group C on the 1st and 3rd day after operation were greater than those of group A, with statistically significant (P<0.05). The rate of subcutaneous ecchymosis and knee joint swelling in group A were higher than those in group B and C, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Continuous opening of the drainage tube after intermittent clamping for 6 h after TKA can improve early joint motion and reduce drainage flow, pain and complications.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Yue L,Berman J. What is Osteoarthritis? [J]. JAMA,2022, 327(13):1300.
[2] Al-Dadah O,Hing C. Revision Total Knee Replacement: A national service reconfiguration vis-à-vis GIRFT [J]. Knee,2021,29:595-597.
[3] 曾立,王永才,邢更彦,等.唑来膦酸联合双醋瑞因对绝经后骨质疏松合并早中期膝骨关节炎疗效[J].中国医药导报,2022,19(30):88-91.
[4] Sacitharan PK. Ageing and Osteoarthritis [J].Subcell Bioc- hem,2019,91:123-159.
[5] Katz JN,Arant KR,Loeser RF. Diagnosis and Treatment of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis:A Review [J]. JAMA,2021,325(6):568-578.
[6] Liu L,Liu H,Zhang H,et al. Bilateral total knee arthroplasty:Simultaneous or staged? A systematic review and meta- analysis [J]. Medicine,2019,98(22):e15931
[7] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组,中国医师协会骨科医师分会骨关节炎学组,国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心(湘雅医院),等.中国骨关节炎诊疗指南(2021年版)[J].中华骨科杂志,2021,41(18):1291-1314.
[8] 高超,郁春,管礼安,等.骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折经皮椎体成形术后骨水泥分布类型对疗效的影响[J].中国医药导报,2023,20(3):84-87.
[9] Gross JB. Estimating allowable blood loss: corrected for dilution [J]. Anesthesiology,1983,58(3):277-280.
[10] Nadler SB,Hidalgo JU,Bloch T. Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults [J]. Surgery,1962,51(2): 224-232.
[11] 徐攀峰,周元林,杨尚蓉,等.刃针治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的临床效果[J].中国医药导报,2022,19(12):96-99.
[12] 王珊珊.膝关节骨性关节炎快速进展患者MRI特征分析[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2022,20(10):147-149.
[13] 赵继阳,陈黎明,郭盛君,等.膝骨关节炎中医外治法研究进展[J].中国医药导报,2021,18(26):43-45,64.
[14] 张传燚,林登峰,李晓涛.膝关节解剖研究在全膝关节置换术中的应用[J].中国老年学杂志,2022,42(23):5903-5905.
[15] 吴长坤,杨波,姜鑫,等.全膝关节置换术中止血带的使用对术后血红蛋白变化的影响[J].临床骨科杂志,2022, 25(6):812-816.
[16] Yuan Y,Zhang HJ,Zhang B,et al. Case-control study on effect of early intermittently closing drainage tube for blood loss after total knee arthroplasty [J]. Zhongguo Gu Shang,2019,32(1):60-63.
[17] 孙磊.全髋关节置换及全膝关节置换术后隐性失血的研究[J].医学信息,2021,34(14):60-62.
[18] 杨天翔,张博文,张晋宁,等.术中放置引流管对初次全膝关节置换术患者围手术期失血量及术后疼痛的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(12):1548-1551,1556.
[19] 毛伟,李爱国,董飞,等.膝关节假体周围感染危险因素的荟萃分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(7):620-623.
[20] 张朝梅,陈春萍.不同引流压力在全膝关节置换术后引流中的效果观察[J].护理实践与研究,2021,18(24):3726-3728.
[21] 徐西奎.全膝关节置换术后不同引流管夹闭时间对于患者术后恢复的影响[J].世界复合医学,2021,7(7):137- 139.
[22] 张喜明.全膝关节置换术后应用氨甲环素联合早期间断夹闭引流管的干预效果分析[J].吉林医学,2022,43(3):663-665.
[23] 徐志浩,董乐乐,陈婷,等.全膝关节置换术后置管及置管时间临床对比研究[J].包头医学院学报,2022,38(1): 12-16.
[24] 张建光,邓长弓,陈路,等.重度膝骨关节炎合并股骨外侧弓患者初次全膝关节置换后下肢力线与近期临床效果的关系[J].中国医药科学,2021,11(20):216-219.
[25] 陈德鑫,朱锦明,陈永华,等.全膝关节置换术后不同时间开始主动功能锻炼对炎症程度的影响[J].中国当代医药,2021,28(15):91-94.
[26] Senthil Kumar G,Von Arx O,Pozo J. Rate of blood loss over 48 hours following total knee replacement [J]. Knee,2005,12(4):307-309.
[27] 巩建宝,孙水,张伟,等.初次全膝关节置换术后引流管夹闭时间选择与隐性失血量的相关性研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2014,22(7):589-593.
[28] Xu H,Xie J,Lei Y,et al. Closed suction drainage following routine primary total joint arthroplasty is associated with a higher transfusion rate and longer postoperative length of stay: a retrospective cohort study [J]. J Orthop Surg Res,2019, 14(1):163.
[29] Zhang Q,Liu L,Sun W,et al. Are closed suction drains necessary for primary total knee arthroplasty?: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2018, 97(30):e11290. |
|
|
|