|
|
Effect of high speed turbine drill combined with ultrasonic osteotome on extraction of mandibular impacted wisdom teeth |
XU Jinwei1 ZHANG Qin2 CHEN Haisu2 YU Baojun2 YU Huiming1▲ |
1.Department of Stomatology, Huaian First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province, Huaian 223300, China;
2.Department of Stomatology, Huaian Fifth People’s Hospital, Jiangsu Province, Huaian 223300, China
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of high speed turbine drill combined with ultrasonic osteotome on extraction of mandibular impacted wisdom teeth. Methods From January 2021 to January 2022, 100 patients (100 teeth) with mandibular impacted wisdom teeth were selected from Huaian First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University. The patients were divided into control group (high-speed turbine drill) and observation group (high-speed turbine drill combined with ultrasonic osteotome) by random number table method, with 50 cases in each group. Perioperative conditions, postoperative pain, swelling, restriction of mouth opening, levels of inflammatory factors, incidence of complications, and quality of life were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05); the intraoperative blood flow in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The grade of pain, swelling, and mouth opening limitation in the observation group were better than those in the control group (P<0.05). After surgery, the levels of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in the two groups were higher than those before surgery, and the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The score of postoperative symptom severity scale and the total incidence of complications in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion High speed turbine drill combined with ultrasonic osteotome can effectively shorten the operation time, reduce postoperative pain and stress reaction, improve the quality of life, and it is safe and reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 谢伟珍,吴灿锋,张晓东.下颌水平阻生智齿拔除术后感染的影响因素及预防对策[J].海南医学,2020,10(1):16-18.
[2] 屈鹏飞,杨威,贾志宇,等.拔除下颌近中阻生智齿中解除邻牙阻力的策略[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2020,36(6):4-8.
[3] 王立军,候文辉,袁旭红,等.改良型富血小板纤维蛋白预防下颌阻生智齿拔除术后并发症的效果[J].武警医学,2021,32(4):5-9.
[4] 王竑,杨震,寿柏泉.涡轮钻法在拔牙术中的应用[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2001,11(S1):11-14.
[5] 李平,盛美春.高速涡轮钻微创拔牙法治疗下颌阻生智齿的临床效果研究[J].中国全科医学,2020,10(S02):12-15.
[6] 谢梦兰,杨素真,蔡墅曼,等.仰角高速涡轮机在下颌埋伏智齿拔除中的临床应用[J].中国医刊,2019,54(10):3-8.
[7] 董方,何升腾,童远武,等.超声骨刀在下颌复杂阻生智齿拔除中的应用及对疼痛介质水平的影响[J].中国医学装备,2021,18(5):105-108.
[8] 邱蔚六.口腔颌面外科[J].中华医学杂志,1993,73(12):2-5.
[9] 许竞,欧尧.下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛、张口受限及肿胀之分析[J].广东牙病防治,2002,10(1):15-18.
[10] 叶周熹,杨驰,樊林峰.下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术邻牙损伤风险及预防[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2015,13(5):429-434.
[11] Ruta DA,Bissias E,Ogston S,et al. Assessing health outcomes after extraction of third molars: the postoperative symptom severity (PoSSe) scale [J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2000,38(5):480-487.
[12] 朱文瑄,苑绪光,朱骏飞,等.阻生智齿冠周组织病理改变影响因素分析[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2022,38(2):14-16.
[13] 段登辉,王恩博,崔念晖,等.下颌阻生智齿拔除手术的可预期微创化[J].北京大学学报:医学版,2020,52(2):29-32.
[14] 邓志武.微创拔牙术治疗下颌低位阻生智齿的疗效观察[J].实用临床医药杂志,2020,24(22):103-106.
[15] 丛斌.高速涡轮钻拔牙在下颌阻生智齿患者中的应用[J].中国卫生标准管理,2021,12(12):4-6.
[16] 聂廷洪,高丽荣,常博杰,等.超声骨刀在老年患者牙槽骨修整术中的临床应用[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2020,18(4):4-8.
[17] 刘子豪,孙春生,蔡晨需,等.面向人体骨切削的超声骨刀整体设计与仿真分析[J].生物医学工程研究,2020, 39(1):6-9.
[18] 王翌晨,吴书彬,张东生,等.高速涡轮牙科手机的不良事件分析与维护工程[J].中国医学装备,2021,18(3):3-7.
[19] 雷飞,倪菁,王丹杨.微创拔牙技术在下颌埋伏阻生智齿拔除过程中的应用研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2020, 36(6):4-9.
[20] 覃有智.微创拔牙术拔除阻生智牙的疼痛,应激反应及安全性研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2021,12(21):4-7.
[21] 苏伟喆,范亚伟.超声骨刀联合涡轮钻拔除下颌复杂阻生第三磨牙的早期效果评价[J].山西医药杂志,2020, 49(1):123-127.
[22] 向国林,李林林,魏钰璋,等.超声骨刀联合45°反角涡轮钻拔除下颌阻生智齿的临床应用[J].口腔医学研究,2020,10(1):4-7.
[23] 黄巧艳,胡砚平.下颌埋伏亲吻磨牙微创拔除1例[J].口腔医学研究,2020,36(9):2-5.
[24] 秦文龙.微创拔牙术和传统拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除患者中的临床应用效果[J].中国当代医药,2021,28(8):119-121,125.
[25] 辛海燕,林鹏,姚超.不同骨皮质切开术在磨牙压低治疗中的应用研究[J].中国医药科学,2022,12(19):182- 185.
[26] 丁凤,吴娴,杨细虎,等.超声骨刀微创拔牙法与传统拔牙法拔除下颌水平阻生牙的效果比较[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2019,17(5):5-9.
[27] 宋勇,李想,蔡嫚,等.超声骨刀与涡轮法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的效果比较[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2019, 17(6):125-127.
|
|
|
|