|
|
|
| Visual analysis of research status of previous cesarean scar defect based on CiteSpace |
| CHEN Weihong1 SHI Wenyin1 ZONG Minghui2 WANG Min2 WANG Yiqun1 LI Wei1 |
1.Department of Gynecology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu Province, Zhenjiang 212000, China;
2.Medical College, Jiangsu University, Jiangsu Province, Zhenjiang 212000, China
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To visually analyze the research status of previous cesarean scar defect (PCSD) based on CiteSpace software, so as to provide reference for future research. Methods By searching the research literature related to PCSD from January 2000 to December 2021 in CNKI and Web of Science core collection database, CiteSpace software was used to visually analyze the number of publications, publishing countries, publishing institutions, authors, and keywords in this field. Results A total of 1 037 literatures were included, including 987 articles from CNKI and 111 articles from Web of Science core collection database. China had the largest number of publications. The number of domestic PCSD publications has experienced three different stages of development, with the highest number of publications in 2018. Compared with the intensive cooperation network structure at abroad, the cooperative relations among domestic institutions were loosely distributed. The team led by Professor Wang Xipeng published the most articles at home and abroad. The most centrality and most occurrence in China was “cesarean section”; foreign centrality was the strongest “risk factor”. “Uterine incision” was the strongest at home, and “management” was the strongest at abroad. Conclusion China is the core country in PCSD, and there may be some regional imbalance in domestic. The research hotspots at home and abroad are slightly different. The incidence of PCSD is likely to increase further in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 冯佩明，王晓岩，李博，等.剖宫产瘢痕憩室形成影响因素及宫腔镜联合腹腔镜手术治疗效果的临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志，2019，35（11）：860-864.
[2] 韩乔，周星辰，汪希鹏.剖宫产后子宫瘢痕憩室形成因素的研究进展[J].国际妇产科学杂志，2021，48（1）：95-98.
[3] 屈航，刘晨，楚光华.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕憩室的发病原因及诊治现状[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志，2019，6（14）：9-13.
[4] 刘子立.浅析全面开放计划生育的必要性——以人口结构变化为视角[J].现代经济信息，2019（1）：14.
[5] 阮焱，张为远.剖宫产的现状及剖宫产率高居不下的原因[J].实用妇产科杂志，2015，31（4）：241-243.
[6] 胡金兰.二胎生育率低迷的影响因素及对策研究[J].智库时代，2019（52）：282-283.
[7] Wang E，Hesketh T. Large reductions in cesarean delivery rates in China： a qualitative study on delivery decision- making in the era of the two-child policy [J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth，2017，17（1）：405.
[8] 柯抒晨，林义，夏晖.剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室形成的危险因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健，2019，34（9）：1994-1997.
[9] Chen Y，Han P，Wang YJ，et al. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet，2017，296（2）：355-361.
[10] 冼艳丽，周西，刘仲.剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的临床原因分析[J].深圳中西医结合杂志，2018，28（12）：177- 178.
[11] 金珈汐，仲莞，陈震宇，等.“全面二孩”政策开放后剖宫产指征变化情况及现状分析[J].中国实验诊断学，2020，24（1）：64-67.
[12] 罗惠娟，李依米，王宁，等.子宫切口瘢痕缺陷再次妊娠结局[J].暨南大学学报（自然科学与医学版），2018，39（3）：236-241.
[13] 李毓虹，应豪.子宫切口憩室与妊娠关系研究进展[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2018，34（3）：331-334.
[14] Bi B，Gao S，Ruan F，et al. Analysis on clinical association of uterine scar diverticulum with subsequent infertility in patients underwent cesarean section [J]. Medicine（Baltimore），2021，100（41）：e27531.
[15] Cheng XY，Cheng L，Li WJ，et al. The effect of surgery on subsequent pregnancy outcomes among patients with cesarean scar diverticulum [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet，2018， 141（2）：212-216.
[16] 生蓉，汪希鹏.剖宫产后子宫瘢痕憩室治疗方式的研究进展[J].国际妇产科学杂志，2021，48（4）：390-394，402.
[17] 王彤，曾婕.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕憩室诊治研究进展[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志，2020，7（10）：8-9.
[18] Dai L，Wang H，Xing X，et al. An analysis of curative effect of combined transvaginal and hysteroscopic electrocauterization of partial endometrium to treat previous cesarean scar diverticulum [J]. Minerva Surg，2022，77（2）：139-146.
[19] Zhang NN，Wang GW，Yang Q. Endoscopic Treatment of Previous Cesarean Scar Defect in Women with Postmenstrual Bleeding： A Retrospective Cohort Study [J]. J Invest Surg，2020，34（10）：1147-1155.
[20] 王细拉.经宫腹腔镜联合手术切除治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口瘢痕憩室的疗效[J].中国妇幼保健，2017，32（17）：4277-4279.
[21] 陈雪芬，华玉蓉，陈昱，等.生物反馈电刺激疗法治疗剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕憩室的效果观察[J].中国计划生育和妇产科，2021，13（8）：60-62，67.
[22] Zhang Q，Lei L，Zhang A，et al. Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus hysteroscopic approach in patients with previous cesarean scar defect： a retrospective cohort study [J]. Ann Transl Med，2021，9（20）：1529.
[23] 李院强，朱其舟，叶倩，等.经阴道与宫腹腔镜两种手术方式治疗子宫切口憩室效果的Meta分析[J].实用临床医学，2020，21（12）：30-36.
[24] 夏伟兰，刘冰，王伶俐，等.3种手术方式治疗剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕憩室的临床疗效对比及评价[J].中国计划生育和妇产科，2020，12（6）：79-81，86.
[25] 段涛，刘兴会，漆洪波，等.剖宫产术缝合技术及材料选择专家共识（2018）[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2018，34（4）：405-408. |
|
|
|
