|
|
Influence of triple-tunnel Femoral-Intrafix fixed double bundle reconstruction on knee stability and function in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury |
FENG Zhiwei LIU Diankui CHANG Deyong LIANG Zhenxing YANG Hui▲ |
Department of Orthopaedics, Huabeiyiliao Jiankangjituan Fengfeng Zongyiyuan, Hebei Province, Handan 056200, China
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the influence of triple-tunnel Femoral-Intrafix fixed double bundle reconstruction on knee stability and function in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Methods Fifty-four patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury of knee joint admitted to Huabeiyiliao Jiankangjituan Fengfeng Zongyiyuan from November 2019 to November 2020 were selected and divided into observation group and control group by random drawing method, with 27 cases in each group. Single-tunnel single bundle reconstruction was used in the control group, while triple-tunnel Femoral-Intrafix fixed double bundle reconstruction was used in the observation group, and both groups were followed up for 24 months after surgery. The operation and postoperative conditions of the two groups were compared, the differences in joint function and knee stability before operation and 24 months after operation between the two groups were compared, and the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups was recorded. Results The time of hospitalization, weight bearing, and getting out of bed in the observation group were shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05). At 24 months after operation, International Knee Documentation Committee score and Lysholm score of the two groups were higher than those before operation, and those of observation group were higher than those of control group (P<0.05). At 24 months after operation, the positive rates of the front drawer test and Lachman test in the two groups were lower than those before operation, and the positive rate of the axial shift test in the observation group was lower than that before operation and control group (P<0.05); there was no statistical significance in the positive rate of the axial shift test in the control group compared with that before operation (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Triple-tunnel Femoral-Intrafix fixed double bundle reconstruction can restore the function and rotational stability of the patient’s knee joint better, and is worthy of clinical promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 刘志成,李雁,张其亮.前交叉韧带重建后膝关节周围屈伸肌力与运动功能的变化[J].中国组织工程研究,2018,22(27):4393-4399.
[2] 陈明,董启榕,徐炜,等.单束与双束解剖重建前交叉韧带临床疗效的荟萃分析[J].中华外科杂志,2010,48(17):1332-1336.
[3] Alepuz ES,Miranda I,Miranda FJ. Functional evaluation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury. A transversal analytical study [J]. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Tr,2020,64(2):99- 107.
[4] 谷军,王爱兵,李坤庆,等.关节镜下单束解剖重建治疗前交叉韧带断裂[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2017,28(S2):317-318.
[5] Skand S,Naik AK,Appan K,et al. Analysis of modified double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with implantless fixation on tibial side [J]. Chin J Trauma:Engl,2020,23(6):341-345.
[6] Oniki Y,Murakami T,Nakamura E. Second-look arthroscopic evaluation and clinical outcomes after anatomical double- bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with generalized joint laxity or hyperextended knee [J]. J ISAKOS,2021,6(6):441-442.
[7] 翟桂华.膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的诊断[J].中华外科杂志,1992,30(1):10-13.
[8] 李晋川,马强华,王云冰,等.膝关节内侧副韧带及其损伤的MRI诊断[J].临床放射学杂志,2001,20(8):621-623.
[9] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组.骨关节炎诊疗指南(2018年版)[J].中华骨科杂志,2018,38(12):705-715.
[10] Cox CL,Huston LJ,Dunn WR,et al. Are articular cartilage lesions and meniscus tears predictive of IKDC,KOOS,and Marx activity level outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?A 6-year multicenter cohort study [J]. Am J Sports Med,2014,42(5):1058-1067.
[11] 陈家贵.新型人工韧带材料重建交叉韧带的系统评价[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2009,13(25):4943- 4946.
[12] 王亚雄,刘晓宁,张伟.双束解剖重建术对膝关节前交叉韧带损伤患者膝关节稳定性的影响[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2021,20(11):1206-1209.
[13] Steckel H,Starman JS,Baums MH,et al. The double-bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:a systematic overview [J]. Scand J Med Sci Sports,2010,17(2):99-108.
[14] 谢卫勇,朱伟民.单束重建与解剖双束重建治疗内侧副韧带Ⅲ级损伤的生物力学比较研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2020,34(6):720-725.
[15] Grassi A,Signorelli C,Lucidi GA,et al. ACL reconstruction with lateral plasty reduces translational and rotatory laxity compared to anatomical single bundle and non-an- atomical double bundle surgery:An in vivo kinematic evaluation with navigation system [J]. Clin Biomech(Bristol,Avon),2020,69(1):1-8.
[16] 王聪,仇嘉宇,陈杰波,等.前交叉韧带双束重建对比前外侧联合重建的关节接触分析:一项基于双平面追踪的随机对照研究[J].医用生物力学,2021,36(S1):364.
[17] Ana B,Mi A,Tn A,et al. Evaluation of the intraoperative kinematics during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a navigation system [J]. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol,2020,19(4):11-16.
[18] 赵立连,卢明峰,邢基斯,等.Endobutton袢钢板与Rigidfix横穿钉股骨端固定自体腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带的转归[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(3):359-365.
[19] 冯延松,石展英,胡居正,等.关节镜双Endobutton钢板与切开固定PCL止点骨折的比较[J].实用骨科杂志,2020,26(4):309-312.
[20] 孔祥喆,谢庆云,黄鹏.X线联合CT加权均数测量双束韧带重建术后骨隧道[J].实用骨科杂志,2019,25(12):1135-1137.
[21] 李小建,付战利,吕昌伟.单股骨胫骨骨隧道双束重建膝ACL胫骨端移植物张力差异化固定的疗效[J].实用骨科杂志,2018,24(8):754-756.
[22] 王巍,刘飞,王新民,等.关节镜下三隧道重建术治疗膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的疗效观察[J].川北医学院学报,2020,35(2):236-239.
[23] 张含霁,杨默笛,张卓,等.膝关节镜下前十字韧带重建术的研究进展[J].中国实验诊断学,2018,22(4):742-745.
[24] 王新民,刘飞,赵海霞,等.关节镜下单隧道单束与三隧道双束不同植入物重建前交叉韧带:膝关节稳定性及活动功能[J].中国组织工程研究,2018,22(27):4387- 4392.
[25] 吴星火,王洪,孟春庆,等.关节镜下单隧道双束Fem- oral Intrafix固定重建前交叉韧带临床疗效初步研究[J].中国运动医学杂志,2014,33(2):99-103. |
|
|
|