|
|
|
| Research progress in the application of artificial intelligence in the assisted reproduction field |
| XIE Yanpeng YANG Huan LIU Jianrong |
Department of Reproductive Medicine, the Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Province, Taiyuan 030001, China
|
|
|
|
Abstract Artificial intelligence has been often used in assisted reproductive technology in recent years. Semen quality, endometrial thickness, tubal patency, embryo selection and transfer, uterine cavity microenvironment, and other factors will affect assisted reproductive technology. Artificial intelligence can be applied to the diagnosis and treatment of reproductive diseases through processing images, data analysis, predictive models, embryo grading, robotic surgery, and other emerging technologies, so as to achieve accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment, but the pros and cons of some operations are still controversial. Although artificial intelligence has made great progress in the medical field, but there are still few relevant literature reports in China. This paper reviews the research progress of artificial intelligence in the assisted reproduction field in recent years, and discusses the development prospects of artificial intelligence in reproductive medicine in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Tiitinen A. Single embryo transfer：Why and how to identify the embryo with the best developmental potential [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab，2019，33（1）：77-88.
[2] Siristatidis C，Vogiatzi P，Pouliakis A，et al. Predicting IVF Outcome：A Proposed Web-based System Using Artificial Intelligence [J]. In Vivo，2016，30（4）：507-512.
[3] Auger J，Eustache F，Chevrier C，et al. Spatiotemporal trends in human semen quality [J]. Nat Rev Urol，2022，19（10）：597- 626.
[4] Zhou M，Yao T，Li J，et al. Preliminary prediction of semen quality based on modifiable lifestyle factors by using the XGBoost algorithm [J]. Front Med（Lausanne），2022，9：811890.
[5] Gil D，Girela JL，De Juan J，et al. Predicting seminal quality with artificial intelligence methods [J]. Expert Syst Appl，2012，39（16）：12564-12573.
[6] El-Shafeiy E，El-Desouky A，El-Ghamrawy S. An Optimized Artificial Neural Network Approach Based on Sperm Whale Optimization Algorithm for Predicting Fertility Quality [J]. Stud Inform Control，2018，27（3）：349-358.
[7] Sahoo AJ，Kumar Y. Seminal quality prediction using data min- ing methods [J]. Technol Health Care，2014，22（4）：531- 545.
[8] Corona G，Minhas S，Giwercman A，et al. Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia：a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Hum Reprod Update，2019，25（6）：733-757.
[9] Cissen M，Meijerink AM，D’Hauwers KW，et al. Prediction model for obtaining spermatozoa with testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia [J]. Hum Reprod，2016，31（9）：1934-1941.
[10] Ma Y，Li F，Wang L，et al. A risk prediction model of sperm retrieval failure with fine needle aspiration in males with non-obstructive azoospermia [J]. Hum Reprod，2019，34（2）： 200-208.
[11] Tran D，Cooke S，Illingworth PJ，et al. Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer [J]. Hum Reprod，2019， 34（6）：1011-1018.
[12] Abdullah KAL，Atazhanova T，Chavez-Badiola A，et al. Automation in ART：Paving the Way for the Future of Infertility Treatment [J]. Reprod Sci，2023，30（4）：1006-1016.
[13] Thirumalaraju P，Bormann CL，Kanakasabapathy M，et al. Automated sperm morpshology testing using artificial intelligence [J]. Fertil Steril，2018，110（4）：e432.
[14] Finelli R，Leisegang K，Tumallapalli S，et al. The validity and reliability of computer-aided semen analyzers in performing semen analysis：a systematic review [J]. Transl Androl Urol，2021，10（7）：3069-3079.
[15] Parekattil SJ，Gudeloglu A. Robotic assisted andrological surgery [J]. Asian J Androl，2013，15（1）：67-74.
[16] Chitwood WR Jr. Historical evolution of robot-assisted cardiac surgery：a 25-year journey [J]. Ann Cardiothorac Surg，2022，11（6）：564-582.
[17] Kolhe JV，Chhipa AS，Butani S，et al. PCOS and Depression：Common Links and Potential Targets [J]. Reprod Sci，2022，29（11）：3106-3123.
[18] Kangasniemi MH，Komsi EK，Rossi HR，et al. Artificial intelligence deep learning model assessment of leukocyte counts and proliferation in endometrium from women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome [J]. F S Sci，2022，3（2）：174-186.
[19] Kavoussi PK. Validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal [J]. Asian J Androl，2015，17（2）：245-247.
[20] Singh K，Dewani D. Recent Advancements in In Vitro Fertilisation [J]. Cureus，2022，14（10）：e30116.
[21] Martin RF. Robotic Surgery [J]. Surg Clin North Am，2020， 100（2）：xiii-xiv.
[22] Won S，Hwang JY，Lee N，et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone level may predict successful pregnancy after adenomyomectomy in patients with infertility due to adenomyosis [J]. Medicine （Baltimore），2021，100（21）：e26075.
[23] Riemma G，Vitale SG，Manchanda R，et al. The role of hysteroscopy in reproductive surgery：Today and tomorrow [J]. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod，2022，51（4）：102350.
[24] Estes SJ，Waldman I，Gargiulo AR. Robotics and Reproductive Surgery [J]. Semin Reprod Med，2017，35（4）：364-377.
[25] Guo C，Li H. Application of 5G network combined with AI robots in personalized nursing in China：A literature review [J]. Front Public Health，2022，10：948303.
[26] Huang B，Tan W，Li Z，et al. An artificial intelligence model（euploid prediction algorithm）can predict embryo ploidy status based on time-lapse data [J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol，2021，19（1）：185.
[27] Milazzotto MP，Noonan MJ，de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz M. Mining RNAseq data reveals dynamic metaboloepigenetic profiles in human，mouse and bovine pre-implantation embryos [J]. iScience，2022，25（3）：103904.
[28] Kochan J，Nowak A，Kij B，et al. Analysis of Morphokinetic Parameters of Feline Embryos Using a Time-Lapse System [J]. Animals（Basel），2021，11（3）：748.
[29] Conaghan J，Chen AA，Willman SP，et al. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology：results from a prospective multicenter trial [J]. Fertil Steril，2013，100（2）： 412-9.e5.
[30] Lundin K，Park H. Time-lapse technology for embryo culture and selection [J]. Ups J Med Sci，2020，125（2）：77-84.
[31] Santos Filho E，Noble JA，Poli M，et al. A method for semi-automatic grading of human blastocyst microscope images [J]. Hum Reprod，2012，27（9）：2641-2648.
[32] Wang Y，Moussavi F，Lorenzen P. Automated embryo stage classification in time-lapse microscopy video of early human embryo development [J]. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv，2013，16（Pt 2）：460-467.
[33] Rosenwaks Z，Handyside AH，Fiorentino F，et al. The pros and cons of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy：clinical and laboratory perspectives [J]. Fertil Steril，2018， 110（3）：353-361.
[34] Munné S，Kaplan B，Frattarelli JL，et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients：a multicenter randomized clinical trial [J]. Fertil Steril，2019，112（6）：1071-9.e7.
[35] Huang B，Zheng S，Ma B，et al. Using deep learning to predict the outcome of live birth from more than 10，000 embryo data [J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth，2022，22（1）：36.
[36] Aboulghar MM，El-Faissal Y，Kamel A，et al. The effect of early administration of rectal progesterone in IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies on the preterm birth rate：a randomized trial [J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth，2020，20（1）：351.
[37] Barrie A，Homburg R，Mcdowell G，et al. Examining the efficacy of six published time-lapse imaging embryo selection algorithms to predict implantation to demonstrate the need for the development of specific，in-house morphokinetic selection algorithms [J]. Fertil Steril，2017，107（3）：613-621.
[38] Gleicher N，Kushnir VA，Barad DH. How PGS/PGT-A laboratories succeeded in losing all credibility [J]. Reprod Biomed Online，2018，37（2）：242-245. |
|
|
|
