|
|
|
| Effect of synchronous spouse empowerment education on pregnant women at high risk of gestational diabetes mellitus |
| WU Saisai1 ZHANG Liqin2▲ ZHANG Haibo3 XU Wanqing4 |
1.Ward Three, Department of Obstetrics, Nantong Maternal and Child Health Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Jiangsu Province, Nantong 226018, China;
2.Department of Nursing, Nantong Maternal and Child Health Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Jiangsu Province, Nantong 226018, China; 3.Department of Endocrinology, Nantong Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Jiangsu Province, Nantong 226018, China; 4.School of Clinical Medicine, Nantong University, Jiangsu Province, Nantong 226006, China |
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of synchronous spouse empowerment education on pregnant women at high risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Methods Objective sampling method was used to select 100 pregnant women with high risk of gestational diabetes from January 2019 to December 2021 in the Ward Three of Obstetrics Department, Nantong Maternal and Child Health Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, according to random number table method, they were divided into control group and experimental group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group was given routine obstetric health education, on the basis of the control group, the experimental group was given synchronous spouse empowerment education. The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, blood glucose level, pregnancy weight, maternal psychological status, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus in experimental group was lower than that in control group (P＜0.05); there was no significant difference in fasting blood glucose between the two groups (P＞0.05). The blood 1-hour postprandial glucose, and 2-hour postprandial glucose after sugar administration in experimental group were lower than those in control group (P＜0.05); there was no significant difference in pregnancy weight between the two groups (P＞0.05). The scores of anxiety and depression in both groups were lower than before intervention, and the score of anxiety and depression in experimental group were lower than those in control group (P＜0.05). Nursing satisfaction scores of experimental group was higher than that of control group (P＜0.05). Conclusion Synchronous spouse empowerment education for pregnant women at high risk of gestational diabetes can reduce the incidence of gestational diabetes, control the blood sugar level, reduce the negative emotions of anxiety and depression, and improve nursing satisfaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 钟婕，周英凤，章孟星.孕期运动预防妊娠期糖尿病效果的系统评价再评价[J].护士进修杂志，2019，34（12）：1057- 1065，1145.
[2] Nauck M，Petersmann A，Müller-Wieland D，et al. Definition，klassifikation und diagnostik desdiabetes mellitus [J]. Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel，2018，13（2）：90-96.
[3] 徐妍，李林霞.血清摄食抑制因子1、肥胖抑制素和胰高血糖素样肽1水平对妊娠期糖尿病不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J].第二军医大学学报，2021，42（12）：1428-1433.
[4] 李艺，段丽娜，陈静，等.孕前体重指数与妊娠期糖尿病发生风险及妊娠结局的相关性研究[J].现代预防医学，2019，46（2）：262-264，273.
[5] Basri NI，Mahdy ZA，Ahmad S，et al. The World Health Organization （WHO） versus The International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group （IADPSG） diagnostic criteria of gestational diabetes mellitus （GDM） and their associated maternal and neonatal outcomes [J]. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig，2018，34（1）：25-32.
[6] 程峰，朱怡恬，文志发.南京地区妊娠期糖尿病发病率分析[J].微量元素与健康研究，2019，36（5）：27-29.
[7] 王斌，曾杉，夏芳.妊娠期糖尿病患者不同空腹血糖水平对血糖波动和饮食干预结局的影响[J].中国妇幼保健，2022，37（5）：792-795.
[8] 李金英，马晓娟.妊娠期糖尿病发生的危险因素分析及对妊娠结局的影响[J].解放军医药杂志，2020，32（2）：67- 70.
[9] 蒋湘，卞政，袁玲，等.孕前超重及肥胖对孕期体质量控制及妊娠结局的影响[J].国际妇产科学杂志，2019，46（3）：301-304.
[10] 勾宝华，关惠敏，高立研，等.综合护理干预在妊娠期糖尿病高危人群中的应用[J].中华护理杂志，2019，54（4）：511-515.
[11] 黎静，陈伟菊，黄东喜，等.93例孕28周前妊娠期糖尿病患者自我管理现状及影响因素分析[J].护理学报，2018， 25（6）：37-40.
[12] 郭红梅，尹卫，夏青，等.居家护理平台在妊娠期糖尿病患者随访管理中的应用[J].中华护理杂志，2018，53（5）：517-522.
[13] 姚丽萍，李兵晖，郭江波，等.妊娠糖尿病患者回馈教学式健康教育的实施[J].护理学杂志，2018，33（10）：9-12.
[14] 高琴，陈文，王莉.手机APP妊娠期糖尿病管理软件在妊娠期糖尿病管理中的应用研究[J].护理管理杂志，2017，17（6）：447-449.
[15] 戴霄红，潘善军.妊娠期糖尿病患者孕期规范化管理对血糖和妊娠结局的影响[J].中国妇幼保健，2021，36（16）：3716-3718.
[16] 阳红娟，何小霞，严银英，等.配偶同步赋能教育对乳腺癌PICC化疗患者早期自我效能与生活质量的影响[J].护理学杂志，2020，35（6）：72-75.
[17] Wallerstein N. What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? [C]. Berlin：Springer，2006.
[18] 陈洁，陈秀华.乳腺癌PICC化疗应用配偶赋能认知教育的效果及对不良情绪、FACT-B评分的影响[J].河北医药，2022，44（4）：581-584.
[19] 章孟星，周英凤，钟婕，等.妊娠期糖尿病临床护理实践指南的整合研究[J].中华护理杂志，2019，54（1）：104- 113.
[20] Rasmussen K，Yaktine A. Institute of medicine （us）. committee to reexamine iom pregnancy weight guidelines. weight gain during pregnancy：reexamining the guidelines [J]. Women and Birth，2009，19（2）：21.
[21] Zung WWK. A self-rating depression scale [J]. Arch Gener Psych，1965，12：63-70.
[22] 邓桂芳，韦远欢，黄丽葵，等.妊娠期糖尿病系统化家庭管理对母婴临床结局的影响[J].海南医学，2019，30（12）：1538-1541.
[23] 王效惠，赵政，王珊.“互联网+”管理模式在妊娠期糖尿病患者中的应用[J].成都医学院学报，2022，17（5）：615- 618.
[24] 喻荷淋，吴艳，蒋莉，等.妊娠期糖尿病患者血清FGF19浓度的变化及与瘦素、胰岛素抵抗的关系[J].成都医学院学报，2020，15（5）：571-574.
[25] 王海燕，吴丽芳，卓双塔.二甲双胍联合胰岛素治疗妊娠期糖尿病的效果及对不良妊娠结局和血脂代谢的影响[J].中国医学创新，2020，17（33）：5-8.
[26] 朱竹青，眭建，杨婵娟.以家庭为中心的赋能教育对妊娠期糖尿病孕产妇血糖控制的效果评价[J].现代医学，2018，46（8）：961-965.
[27] 燕美琴，王娇，刘亦娜，等.群组孕期保健模式在妊娠期糖尿病孕妇分娩结局中的效果研究[J].中华护理杂志，2021，56（9）：1305-1311.
[28] 蔡红侠，吴晓钰，许翠月，等.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇赋能教育的实践[J].护理学杂志，2019，34（16）：30-32. |
|
|
|
