|
|
Effect of goal-directed fluid therapy on brain protection in elderly patients with old cerebral infarction undergoing beach chair position operation |
LU Xiaoxing1 WANG Kai1 ZHOU Meiyan1 WANG Liuyi2 WANG Liwei1#br# |
1.Department of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221009, China;
2.Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221004, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To evaluate the effect of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) on brain protection in elderly patients with old cerebral infarction undergoing beach chair position(BCP) operation. Methods From September 2020 to September 2021, a total of 152 elderly patients with old cerebral infarction who underwent shoulder arthroscopic operation under BCP in Xuzhou Central Hospital of Jiangsu Province were selected. According to the random number table method, they were divided into control group (group C) and GDFT group (group G), with 76 cases in each group. Group C was given routine fluid therapy; group G was given GDFT. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2) between two groups were compared before anesthesia induction (T0), after tracheal intubation (T1), in BCP immediately (T2), in BCP for 30 min (T3), and back to supine position (T4); the content of serum S100β protein between two groups were compared before operation and one day after operation; operation time, intraoperative fluid volume, urine volume, use of vasoactive drugs, and incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) were compared between two groups. Results Compared with T0, MAP decreased at T1-T4 in both groups, and the difference was highly statistically significant (P < 0.01); in group C, rScO2 increased at T1 and T4, and decreased at T2, and the differences were highly statistically significant (P < 0.01); rScO2 in group G increased at T1-T4, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01); there were significant differences in MAP and rScO2 between two groups at T2-T4, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01); rScO2 in group G was higher than that of group C, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Compared with pre-operation, the serum S100β protein content of two groups was increased at 1 day after operation, and the difference was highly statistically significant (P < 0.01). One day after operation, the serum S100β protein content in group G was lower than that in group C, and the difference was highly statistically significant (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in operation time between two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with group C, the amount of crystal fluid, total infusion volume, urine volume, and utilization rate of vasoactive drugs during operation in group G were decreased, while the amount of colloidal fluid was increased, and the differences were highly statistically significant (P < 0.01). The incidence of POCD in group G was lower than that in group C, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion For elderly patients with old cerebral infarction undergoing BCP surgery, GDFT can effectively improve intraoperative cerebral hypoxia and reduce the occurrence of postoperative neurological complications, and play a certain role in brain protection.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 张燕,李小刚.脊柱术后并发脑梗死19例及文献复习[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2017,19(9):984-985.
[2] 王天龙.从老年患者围术期脑保护到围术期脑健康[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2019,39(10):1153-1154.
[3] 彭文勇,吕华燕,廖俊锋,等.允许性高碳酸血症对沙滩椅体位肩关节镜手术患者脑氧饱和度和术后认知功能的影响[J].中国内镜杂志,2020,26(5):37-42.
[4] Murphy GS,Greenberg SB,Szokol JW. Safety of Beach Chair Position Shoulder Surgery:A Review of the Current Literature [J]. Anesth Analg,2019,129(1):101-118.
[5] 何燕,张建友,孙建宏.ERAS理念指导下围术期液体治疗的研究进展[J].国际外科学杂志,2021,48(1):67-72.
[6] 周美艳,王凯,宦乡,等.目标导向液体疗法对老年肺癌患者术后早期认知功能的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2020, 40(6):107-109.
[7] 刘丝濛,岳云.非心血管非神经外科手术围术期脑卒中[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2016,32(3):298-302.
[8] 颜晓晓,林勉,张顺开,等.围术期缺血性脑卒中的危险因素研究[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2017,19(3):4
[9] 阳淑琴,陈玫,蔡婕.改良颈托在“沙滩椅”体位手术中的应用[J].中国当代医药,2021,28(26):63-66.
[10] 吴钿生,王卓丹,许阳英,等.目标导向液体治疗对胰-肾联合移植患者预后的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2021, 37(8):818-821.
[11] 徐桂萍,吴丽,阿里木江·司马义,等.目标导向液体治疗对肥胖患者术后康复的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2020, 36(4):345-348.
[12] 孙群群,赵晓英,程子健,等.目标导向液体治疗对老年腰椎手术患者氧代谢和局部脑氧饱和度的影响[J].安徽医学,2021,42(1):10-14.
[13] 贾启明,魏蕾,周东民.目标导向液体治疗对肺癌根治术后肺通气功能的影响及对肺栓塞的预防作用[J].现代肿瘤医学,2021,29(18):3199-3203.
[14] 王骜,章放香,彭晶,等.围手术期目标导向液体治疗的研究进展[J].医学综述,2021,27(20):4058-4062.
[15] 夏迪,许力,李旭,等.目标导向液体治疗优化老年腰椎手术患者术中血流动力学降低术后并发症[J].基础医学与临床,2021,41(2):178-183.
[16] 王才木,陈启江,崔巍,等.血清S100β蛋白、神经元特异性烯醇化酶和球静脉氧饱和度在老年心肺脑复苏患者亚低温治疗中变化及其对预后的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(10):2325-2327.
[17] Pappa M,Theodosiadis N,Tsounis A,et al. Pathogenesis and treatment of post-operative cognitive dysfunction [J]. Electron Physician,2017,9(2):3768-3775.
[18] 尹艳灵,张文凤.围手术期脑氧供需和术后认知功能障碍关系的研究进展[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2021,21(11) :812-816.
[19] Cui F,Zhao W,Mu DL. The correlation between tissue oxygen saturation and postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients with one lung ventilation [J]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi,2020,100(41):3218-3223.
[20] Tomaszewski D,Ba?覥kota M,Rybicki Z. Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation Decreases During Primary Hip Arthroplasty:An Analysis of Perioperative Regional Cerebral Oxygenation(rSO2),S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B(S100B)and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein(GFAP)Values. A Pilot Study [J]. Med Sci Monit,2019,25:525-531.
[21] 梁月影,王红艳,王海云,等.术中脑氧饱和度对轻度认知功能障碍老年患者术后神经认知功能障碍的预测价值[J].中华医学杂志,2020,100(41):3224-3229.
[22] 梁仁芮,崔晓媛,王春燕.后腹腔镜下CO2气腹对老年患者脑氧饱和度及S-100β蛋白的影响[J].中国临床研究,2020,33(4):485-487,492.
[23] 刘洋,田丹丹,张超凡,等.目标导向液体治疗对妇科腹腔镜手术术中血流动力学及脑氧饱和度的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志,2020,36(4):349-353.
[24] Joosten A,Delaporte A,Ickx B,et al. Crystalloid versus Colloid for Intraoperative Goal-directed Fluid Therapy Using a Closed-loop System:A Randomized,Double-blinded,Controlled Trial in Major Abdominal Surgery [J]. Anesthesiology,2018,128(1):55-66.
[25] Futier E,Garot M,Godet T,et al. Effect of Hydroxyethyl Starch vs Saline for Volume Replacement Therapy on Death or Postoperative Complications Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery:The FLASH Randomized Clinical Trial [J]. JAMA,2020,323(3):225-236. |
|
|
|