家庭支持及人格特质与尿毒症血液透析患者生存质量的相关性分析

doi:10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2022.24.15

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (32)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (675 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To comprehensively analyze the relationship between personality traits, family support, and quality of life in uremic hemodialysis patients. Methods A total of 90 patients with uremia who received hemodialysis treatment in the blood purification room of Haian People’s Hospital from March 2019 to March 2021 were selected to analyze the relationship between patients’ personality traits, family support, and quality of life. Results The MOS item short form health survey 36 (SF-36) score and perceived social support grom family scale (PSS-Fa) score of patients were (57.64±9.82) and (40.71±6.27) points, respectively. In the Eysenck personality questionnaire-R short scale (EPQ-RSC) scale, the lying (L) score was (5.37±1.06), the neuroticism (N) score was (5.92±1.71), and the extraversion (E) score was (7.32±3.02), and the score of psychoticism (P) was (6.21±2.49). Spearman correlation analysis showed that E and L were positively correlated with family support and quality of life (r ＞ 0, P ＜ 0.05), while P, N were negatively correlated with quality of life (r ＜ 0, P ＜ 0.05). Multiple regression results showed that E and L were positively correlated with family support and quality of life, N and P were negatively correlated with quality of life, L and E were positively correlated with family support, and P was negatively correlated with family support (P ＜ 0.05). Effect decomposition showed that N, P had a negative effect on quality of life, and L, E had a positive effect on quality of life (P ＜ 0.05). EPQ-RSC had a significant positive impact relationship on PSS-Fa; PSS-Fa had a significant positive impact relationship on SF-36; EPQ-RSC had a significant positive impact relationship on SF-36 (P < 0.05). Conclusion The quality of life of uremic hemodialysis patients is related to family support and personality traits. Personality trait analysis and the improvement of family support and social degree can help patients improve their quality of life.

Key words： Uremia Hemodialysis Family support Personality traits Quality of life

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	XU Mei CUI Yihong WANG Deqin

Cite this article:

XU Mei CUI Yihong WANG Deqin. Correlation analysis of family support, personality traits, and quality of life in uremic hemodialysis patients[J]. 中国医药导报, 2022, 19(24): 69-72.

URL:

https://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/EN/10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2022.24.15 OR https://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/EN/Y2022/V19/I24/69

[1] 王霞，蒋松.国家慢性肾脏病全程管理中心（CKDMC）简介[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志，2020，29（5）：106-107.
[2] 孙玉，方晓燕，朱大倩，等.尿毒症肾脏替代治疗患儿生存质量的横断面调查[J].中华肾脏病杂志，2019，35（11）：828-834.
[3] 窦海川，郭宏艳，陈燕，等.促红细胞生成素不同给药方式对尿毒症血液透析合并贫血患者炎症及营养状态的影响[J].中国老年学杂志，2019，39（11）：2707-2708.
[4] 邓晓风，唐玲，万莉，等.不同血液透析模式对尿毒症维持性血液透析患者生长因子-15水平及左心功能的影响[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志，2019，26（4）：409-411.
[5] 郭博慧，李向东，李毅，等.每日血液透析对尿毒症患者透析诱导期、血液生化指标及SCL-90评分的影响[J].中国输血杂志，2019，32（3）：260-263.
[6] 刘欢，陶雅非，任东升.血液透析联合腹膜透析治疗对尿毒症患者营养状况、心肾功能及并发症的影响[J].山东医药，2019，59（14）：69-71.
[7] 帕热旦木·托乎提，李玉芳，张丽，等.维持性血液透析患者蛋白质-能量消耗现况及对生活质量的影响[J].中国医药导报，2019，16（29）：141-144.
[8] 孙杨杨，鄢艳，邹梦林.维持性血液透析患者发生感染相关住院的临床特征和危险因素分析[J].中华肾脏病杂志，2020，36（6）：435-440.
[9] 周悦玲，丁巍，艾红兰，等.维持性血液透析的终末期肾病患者脑结构性异常及认知功能分析[J].上海交通大学学报（医学版），2020，40（7）：962-967.
[10] 张军，赵心阳，辛彦雨，等.医护一体化管理对维持性血液透析患者的护理效果[J].中国医科大学学报，2020， 49（3）：275-279.
[11] Wu J，Li J，Zhu G，et al. Clinical Features of Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients with 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan，China [J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol，2020，15（8）：1139-1145.
[12] 卢明，俞燕娟，李中东，等.基于家庭医护平台延续性护理模式的构建及应用[J].中华护理杂志，2019，54（12）：1851-1855.
[13] 王赟，姜小梅，王芸，等.不同照护模式对老年腹膜透析患者主要照护者负荷的影响[J].中国老年学杂志，2019， 39（11）：2797-2799.
[14] Coyne DW，Ficociello LH，Parameswaran V，et al. Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide in Maintenance Hemodialysis：A Retrospective，Comparative Cohort Study [J]. Kidney Med，2020，2（3）：307-316.
[15] 李艳玲，郭毅.同伴支持健康教育对维持性血液透析患者生活质量影响的效果[J].中国健康教育，2020，36（1）：82-85.
[16] 丛金梅，曹云，张小萍，等.基于自我管理为导向的互联网5A护理模式对维持性血液透析患者生活质量与疲乏状况的影响[J].护理实践与研究，2019，16（22）：65-67.
[17] Wang H，Liu J，Xie D，et al. Elevated serum uric acid and risk of cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients：A meta-analysis [J]. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis，2021，31（2）：372-381.
[18] 王熙宁，张鸿，谢兆媛.维持性血液透析患者自我隐瞒现状及其与病耻感、社会支持的相关性和影响因素分析[J].山东医药，2020，60（17）：84-86.
[19] 仲海峰，黄新忠，周永华，等.计划-实施-检查-处理循环管理办法对维持性血液透析合并高血压患者血压变化和生活质量的影响[J].中华高血压杂志，2020，28（5）：450-456.
[20] Lim JH，Park Y，Yook JM，et al. Randomized controlled trial of medium cut-off versus high-flux dialyzers on quality of life outcomes in maintenance hemodialysis patients [J]. Sci Rep，2020，10（1）：7780.
[21] 高思垚，吕万刚.有氧运动对改善维持性血液透析患者生存质量有效性的Meta分析[J].中国康复医学杂志，2019，34（4）：453-459.
[22] 戴珊珊，马迎春.透析中递增式抗阻运动对维持性血液透析患者营养状况及体脂成分的影响[J].中华肾脏病杂志，2021，37（5）：434-437.
[23] Koshi E，Saito S，Okazaki M，et al. Efficacy of favipiravir for an end stage renal disease patient on maintenance hemodialysis infected with novel coronavirus disease 2019 [J]. CEN Case Rep，2021，10（1）：126-131.
[24] 吴琳虹，张萌，陈兴强，等.维持性血液透析患者血清甲状旁腺激素水平与心功能及生存质量的相关性研究[J].中国现代医学杂志，2019，29（2）：118-123.
[25] 张小桐，肖枫林，玄方，等.维持性血液透析患者骨骼肌减少与生活质量和心理状况的关系[J].第二军医大学学报，2019，40（5）：577-582.
[26] 耿蕾，吴蔚桦，黄超越，等.新增老年血液透析患者反复住院和死亡危险因素分析[J].中国医药导报，2020，17（8）：140-144.
[27] 刘章锁.维持性血液透析患者蛋白质能量消耗与矿物质代谢紊乱的关系[J].中国实用内科杂志，2019，39（11）：930-932.
[28] 侍珍珍，唐景凤，庄静.基于行为转变理论的护理干预对维持性血液透析患者饮食管理依从行为及营养状况的影响[J].中国医药导报，2020，17（32）：175-178.
[29] 赵二丽，尚进，马爽，等.不合并糖尿病的终末期肾脏病患者血液透析和腹膜透析的预后分析[J].中华肾脏病杂志，2020，36（6）：429-434.
[30] 赵俊丽，张婷，闵丹燕，等.维持性血液透析患者血清骨硬化蛋白与冠脉钙化及心血管事件的关系[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志，2020，29（3）：14-20.
[31] Lu C，Wang Y，Wang D，et al. Hypomagnesemia and Short-Term Mortality in Elderly Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients [J]. Kidney Dis （Basel），2020，6（2）：109-118.
[32] 张婧，付莉，罗荣.多维度支持性心理干预在老年维持性血液透析患者主要照顾者中的应用[J].中国医药导报，2020，17（31）：187-190.