新型“勇士”模拟人在战创伤救治教学中的应用效果

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (20)
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (807 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the effect between application of new “Warrior” manikin and traditional methods in the teaching of wound-rescuing course. Methods In October 2017, among 128 undergraduates of grade 2014, clinical medicine major, in the Air Force Medical University, 100 undergraduates were selected by the random number table method and were divided into experimental group and control group, with 50 undergraduates in each group. The experimental group accepted the new “Warrior” manikin teaching system, while the control group accepted the traditional oral teaching, video, and traditional mutual practice. The teaching effect between the two groups was tested by operation assessment analysis, questionnaire was used on evaluating satisfaction and teaching effect. Results The undergraduates in the experimental group were superior to the control group in terms of operational success rate, situational response and humanistic care, that had statistically significant differences (P ＜ 0.05). The final assessment results of the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group, and the difference was remarkably significant (P ＜ 0.01). Teaching satisfaction questionnaire survey results also showed that students were more willing to use the new “Warrior” manikin, especially on the learning interest, efficiency and strain capacity, which had statistically significant difference (P ＜ 0.05). Conclusion The new “Warrior” manikin in teaching can better simulate the actual treatment to improve the level of military medical university students′ comprehensive war injury treatment. It improves the teaching quality and effect, thereby having very important significance.

Key words： Manikin Wound-rescuing Simulation of teaching and learning Teaching effect

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Yang1 FENG Yafei1 TIAN Li1 YANG Xiaojiang1 WANG Jingfu2 ZHAO Yimin2 LEI Wei1

Cite this article:

ZHANG Yang1 FENG Yafei1 TIAN Li1 YANG Xiaojiang1 WANG Jingfu2 ZHAO Yimin2 LEI Wei1. Application effect of new “Warrior” manikin in the wound-rescuing teaching and learning course[J]. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(28): 45-48.

URL:

http://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/EN/Y2018/V15/I28/45

[1] Butler FK. Two decades of saving lives on the battlefield：Tactical Combat Casualty Care turns 20 [J]. Mil Med，2017，182（3）：e1563-e1568.
[2] Butler FK，Bennett B，Wedmore CI. Tactical combat casualty care and wilderness medicine： advancing trauma care in austere environments [J]. Emerg Med Clin North Am，2017，35（2）：391-407.
[3] 李阳，张岫竹，张连阳.战伤战术阶段救治技术的创新策略[J].实用医药杂志，2017，34（1）：1-3.
[4] 刘善收，赵威，李俊杰，等.基于战创伤模拟人的情景模拟教学法在卫勤训练中的应用[J].临床急诊杂志，2017，18（10）：722-725.
[5] 何鹏，罗奇志，马炬，等.标准化伤员库及救治流程在战创伤模拟仿真训练中的应用[J].解放军医院管理杂志，2015，22（8）：737-738.
[6] Deering S，Sawyer T，Mikita J，et al. The Central Simulation Committee（CSC）：a model for centralization and standardization of simulation-based medical education in the US Army healthcare system [J]. Mil Med，2012，177（7）：829-835.
[7] Friedl KE，O'Neil HF. Designing and using computer simulations in medical education and training：an introduction [J]. Mil Med，2013，178（10）：1-6.
[8] Roberts D，Leigh-Smith S，Faris P，et al. Clinical presentation of patients with tension pneumothorax：a systematic review [J]. Ann Surg，2015，261（6）：1068-1078.
[9] Butler FK，Haymann J，Butler EG. Tactical combat casualty care in special operations [J]. Mil Med，1996，161（Suppl）：3-16.
[10] Bian S，He H，Sui JH，et al. The self-crosslinking smart hyaluronic acid hydrogels as injectable three-dimensional scaffolds for cells culture [J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces，2016，140（1）：392-402.
[11] Fan LH，Yang H，Yang J，et al. Preparation and characterization of chitosan/gelatin/PVA hydrogel for wound dressings [J]. Carbohydr Polym，2016，146（1）：427-434.
[12] Eastridge BJ，Mabry RL，Seguin P，et al. Death on the battlefield（2001-2011）：implications for the future of combat casualty care [J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg，2012， 73（6）：S431-S437.
[13] Kelly JF，Ritenour AE，McLaughlin DF，et al. Injury severity and causes of death from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom：2003-2004 versus 2006 [J]. J Trauma，2008，64（2）：S21-S27.
[14] 王海涛，张广，卢恒志，等.战伤救治模拟人技术体系研究现状与发展展望[J].医疗卫生装备，2015，36（2）：119-121.
[15] Goolsby C，Branting A，Ausman J，et al. Systematic review of live tissue versus simulation education for prehospital trauma providers [J]. Mil Med，2017，182（9-10）：e1824-e1833.
[16] Bennett BL，Littlejohn LF，Kheirabadi BS，et al. Management of External Hemorrhage in Tactical Combat Casualty Care：Chitosan-Based Hemostatic Gauze Dressings-TCCC Guidelines Change 13-05 [J]. J Spec Oper Med，2014， 14（3）：40-57.
[17] Gillern S，Bleier JI. Parastomal hernia repair and reinforcement：the role of biologic and synthetic materials [J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg，2014，4（27）：162-171.
[18] 程红群，吴乐山，雷二庆.军队医院应急医学救援能力建设[J].解放军医院管理杂志，2015，22（6）：526-527.
[19] 倪爱娟，田丰，孙秋明，等.医疗培训模拟人技术的现状及其在战伤急救中的应用[J].中国医学装备，2008，5（1）：4-6.
[20] Drew B，Bennett BL，Littlejohn L. Application of current hemorrhage control techniques for backcountry care：part one，tourniquets and hemorrhage control adjuncts [J]. Wilderness Environ Med，2015，26（2）：236-245.