|
|
Comparison of the application effect of cervical single lumen dilation balloon and COOK cervical dilation balloon in promoting cervical maturity during full-term pregnancy#br# |
LI Xiaorong1 LYU Yuping1 HE Bikai2 CHEN Huishan2 |
1.Department of Obstetrics, Nanhai District People’s Hospital of Foshan City, Guangdong Province, 528200, China;
2.Department of Obstetrics, Nanhai Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan City, Guangdong Province, Foshan 528200, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To compare the application effect of domestic cervical single lumen dilation balloon and COOK cervical dilation balloon in promoting cervical maturity during full-term pregnancy. Methods A total of 268 singleton primiparas who were hospitalized for delivery in Nanhai Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan City, Guangdong Province from January 2015 to December 2019 were selected as the research subjects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into domestic cervical single lumen dilation balloon (single balloon group) 136 cases and imported COOK cervical dilation balloon group (COOK double balloon group) 132 cases. The average placement time of cervical single lumen dilation balloon or COOK cervical dilation balloon in each group, the cervical Bishop score after placement, the effective in promoting cervical maturity, the natural birth rate after placement, vaginal delivery rate, vaginal delivery of maternal balloon placement until delivery time, oxytocin use condition, neonatal birth weight, and the incidence of neonatal asphyxia, postpartum hemorrhage, urgent sexual chorioamnitis, and cervical laceration were recorded. Results The average placement time of single balloon group was shorter than that of COOK double balloon group, the cervical Bishop score after placement, the effective in promoting cervical maturity were higher than those of COOK double balloon group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05); there were no significant differences in the natural birth rate after placement, vaginal delivery rate between two groups (P > 0.05). The vaginal delivery of maternal balloon placement until delivery time in single balloon group was shorter than in COOK double balloon group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in oxytocin use condition between two groups (P > 0.05). The cervical laceration rate in single balloon group was lower than that in COOK double balloon group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); there were no significant differences in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and urgent sexual chorioamnitis between two groups (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in neonatal birth weight and the incidence of neonatal asphyxia between two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Compared with COOK cervical dilatation balloon, cervical single lumen dilation balloon has better clinical effect, and can be popularized in clinic to promote cervical maturity and induce labor at full-term.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组.妊娠晚期促宫颈成熟与引产指南(2014)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,49(12):881-885.
[2] 邱敏,黎燕.宫颈成熟度评分法指导人工破膜的临床观察[J].现代医药卫生,2009,25(11):1647-1649.
[3] 郭瑞江.COOK子宫颈扩张球囊在足月妊娠产妇引产前促宫颈成熟中的临床应用效果[J].中国医疗器械信息,2021,27(14):60-61.
[4] 司徒翠瑶,李清汉.宫颈扩张球囊在足月妊娠初产妇促宫颈成熟及引产中分娩效果分析[J].中国社区医师,2021,37(21):42-43.
[5] 冯宁,刘艳.COOK球囊联合缩宫素在瘢痕子宫阴道试产促宫颈成熟中的应用价值[J].临床医学研究与实践,2021,6(25):144-146,153.
[6] 贾琳,赵娟.Cook双球囊与欣普贝生促宫颈成熟对妊娠晚期引产的影响及母婴结局的安全性分析[J].吉林医学,2021,42(7):1601-1603.
[7] 赵丹阳,侯志敏,柴鸥,等.COOK宫颈扩张球囊、欣普贝生在宫颈低评分足月妊娠初产妇引产术中的应用对比[J].山东医药,2019,59(18):61-63.
[8] 黄艳卉,石霞霞,刘岩熠,等.COOK宫颈扩张球囊与缩宫素静脉滴注在足月妊娠引产中的优劣差异[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志,2020,7(2):14-15.
[9] 李菊.宫颈扩张球囊用于足月妊娠促宫颈成熟及引产的临床研究[J].系统医学,2021,6(14):120-122,198.
[10] 屈婉红,韩香妮.子宫颈扩张球囊用于足月妊娠促宫颈成熟及催产的临床有效性及安全性[J].海南医学,2019, 30(3):342-344.
[11] 蒋丽.子宫颈扩张球囊用于促进妊娠晚期女性宫颈成熟和引产的临床价值[J].中外医学研究,2021,19(27):124-127.
[12] 庄莹莹,张晨凌.宫颈扩张球囊应用于足月妊娠引产的临床研究[J].现代妇产科进展,2018,27(6):456-457,461.
[13] 李飞珍.COOK宫颈球囊扩张器促宫颈成熟使用时限探讨[J].中国当代医药,2021,28(4):126-129.
[14] 王兰玉.宫颈扩张球囊用于晚期妊娠引产促宫颈成熟的临床效果[J].中国医疗器械信息,2021,27(10):150-151.
[15] 钟春燕.子宫颈球囊在促进自然分娩临床应用中护理效果的探究及分析[J].中外医疗,2021,40(23):108-110,114.
[16] 邹胜.探讨双球囊导管对瘢痕子宫足月妊娠促宫颈成熟及引产的安全性和有效性[J].中国农村卫生,2021,13(9):24-25.
[17] 赖宝玲,张铨富,许韶荣.双球囊导管用于瘢痕子宫足月妊娠引产的临床研究[J].中国医师杂志,2019,21(7):993-996.
[18] 韦芳琴,刘荃,张念.宫颈单、双扩张球囊和缩宫素对孕足月妊娠期糖尿病孕妇引产中促宫颈成熟的疗效及母婴结局的影响[J].安徽医药,2019,23(9):1871-1874.
[19] 郅玲玲,马秀华,贺笑茜,等.孕足月初产妇应用地诺前列酮和宫颈扩张球囊促宫颈成熟与引产的临床研究[J].生殖医学杂志,2020,29(4):528-532.
[20] 李伟波,陶小玲.一次性宫颈球囊扩张器在足月妊娠引产中的应用价值分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2019,24(3):573-574.
[21] 刘琼珊,陈洁婷,范馥芳.COOK宫颈扩张球囊在引产中的安全有效性及患者满意度的相关研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2020,12(9):37-42.
[22] 胡国秀.探究欣普贝生与COOK双球囊促宫颈成熟的效果及安全性[J].中外医疗,2018,37(33):32-34,37.
[23] 林运珍.宫颈扩张球囊及护理干预措施用于足月引产的临床效果[J].中国医药科学,2022,12(3):117-120.
[24] 陈小友,程应凤,江金娜.COOK球囊和单球水囊促宫颈成熟和分娩效果比较[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2019, 6(80):64.
[25] 刘娜,朱薏,张兰珍.两种球囊在孕足月中促宫颈成熟及引产的比较[J].实用医学杂志,2018,34(8):1301-1304.
[26] 成浩媛,陈燕,赵芳菲.193例宫颈裂伤临床资料分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,10(4):82-85. |
|
|
|