|
|
Analysis of the appearance of color Doppler ultrasonography in severe placental abruption#br# |
WANG Lingling TIAN Yana YANG Shujiao |
Department of Ultrasound, Women and Children’s Hospital of Fuyang City, Anhui Province, Fuyang 236200, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the appearance of color Doppler ultrasonography in severe placental abruption. Methods A total of 238 patients with suspected placental abruption admitted to Women and Children’s Hospital of Fuyang City, Anhui Province from April 2019 to February 2021 were selected as the study subjects. Color Doppler ultrasonography was performed within 24 h after admission, the pathological diagnosis and ultrasonic manifestations of the patients were recorded, and the diagnosis results of severe placental abruption by pathology and color Doppler ultrasonography were compared. Results Fifteen cases of severe placental abruption were diagnosed by color Doppler ultrasonography, of which three cases had irregular anechoic fluid dark area between uterine wall and placenta. In five cases, the solid echo between placenta and uterine wall was similar to that of placenta, and the boundary between tissue and placenta was not clear. In four cases, there were disorderly echo masses and irregular fluid dark area between uterine wall and placenta. In two cases, hyperechoic mass and no blood flow signal were observed behind the placental margin. There was no abnormal echo between uterine wall and placenta in one case, but high echo mass without blood flow signal could be seen in other parts of placenta outside the attachment point. Among the 15 cases of severe placental abruption detected by color Doppler ultrasonography, nine cases were pathologically confirmed as severe placental abruption. The sensitivity and specificity of color Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of severe placental abruption were 81.82% and 97.36%, respectively. The diagnosis of severe placental abruption by color Doppler ultrasound was highly consistent with pathological diagnosis (Kappa = 0.675, P < 0.05). Conclusion Color Doppler ultrasonography can provide ultrasound data reference for clinical diagnosis of severe placental abruption, which is highly consistent with pathological results and worthy of clinical promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Fadl SA,Linnau KF,Dighe MK. Placental abruption and hemorrhage-review of imaging appearance [J]. Emerg Radiol,2019,26(1):87-97.
[2] Elkafrawi D,Sisti G,Araji S,et al. Risk Factors for Neonatal/Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in African American Women with Placental Abruption [J]. Medicina(Kaunas),2020,56(4):61-64.
[3] 易凤连,陈建春,康文慧,等.超声对胎盘早剥的诊断价值及临床应用[J].中国中西医结合影像学杂志,2019,17(1):62-64.
[4] Moukit M,Kouach J. Atypical presentation of placental abruption [J]. Pan Afr Med J,2020,36(2):70.
[5] 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组.胎盘早剥的临床诊断与处理规范(第1版)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2012,47(12):957-958.
[6] Naruse K,Shigemi D,Hashiguchi M,et al. Placental abruption in each hypertensive disorders of pregnancy phenotype:a retrospective cohort study using a national inpatient database in Japan [J]. Hypertens Res,2021,44(2):232-238.
[7] Kovo M,Gonen N,Schreiber L,et al. Histologic chorioamnionitis concomitant placental abruption and its effects on pregnancy outcome [J]. Placenta,2020,94(4):39-43.
[8] Kojima T,Takami M,Shindo R,et al. Perinatal outcomes of recurrent placental abruption [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2021,34(13):2192-2196.
[9] Gonen N,Levy M,Kovo M,et al. Placental Histopathology and Pregnancy Outcomes in“ Early”vs.“Late” Placental Abruption [J]. Reprod Sci,2021,28(2):351-360.
[10] 刘梅梅,杨小花,张欢.超声检查不同严重程度胎盘早剥的临床意义[J].贵州医药,2019,43(6):972-973.
[11] 黄黛,张为霞,黄黧.不典型胎盘早剥超声表现1例[J].中国医学影像技术,2020,36(3):438.
[12] de Moreuil C,Hannigsberg J,Chauvet J,et al. Factors associated with poor fetal outcome in placental abruption [J]. Pregnancy Hypertens,2021,23(1):59-65.
[13] 雷晓慧,张春燕.凝血酶调节蛋白联合超声检查对胎盘早剥的早期诊断价值[J].血栓与止血学,2021,27(5):833-834.
[14] 徐正芳,王念.D-二聚体、可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1联合超声检测在胎盘早剥诊断中的价值[J].暨南大学学报,2019,40(4):328-333.
[15] Sherer DM,Kheyman M,Benayoun J,et al. Incidental sonographic finding of a concealed placental abruption leading to delivery at 37 weeks’ gestation [J]. J Clin Ultrasound,2021,49(6):630-631.
[16] Poon LC,Shennan A,Hyett JA,et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO)initiative on pre-eclampsia:A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2019, 145(1):31-33.
[17] 钟燕秋,刘新秀,叶真,等.胎盘早剥的声像图表现及妊娠结局分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2019,35(6):877-881.
[18] Sass N,Nagahama G,Korkes HA. Placental abruption in each phenotype of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy:a retrospective cohort study using a national inpatient database in Japan [J]. Hypertens Res,2021,44(2):250-252.
[19] 孟秋霞,苏静,刘赛超.多普勒超声检测不同类型胎盘早剥的影像特点及诊断价值探究[J].重庆医学,2020, 49(8):1297-1301.
[20] 周金华,刘兰云.血清指标CA125和PAPP-A联合多普勒超声在胎盘早剥筛查中的应用价值[J].中国性科学,2020,29(7):66-69.
[21] 肖景华,李亚妮,徐叶红.胎盘早剥早期筛查诊断的研究[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2019,30(1):37-41.
[22] 颜雪萍,韩春苗,吴青京,等.三维彩色多普勒超声诊断在胎盘早剥诊断中的应用价值研究[J].中国医学装备,2020,17(4):98-101.
[23] 葛晓莉,李玲,杨道玲.超声结合血清指标诊断胎盘早剥的价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(11):2677-2680.
[24] 范建华,高艳多,何莎,等.胎盘早剥的产前超声诊断价值及妊娠结局分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(12):2177-2180.
[25] 张杰,陈玉红,牛学利.超声诊断胎盘早剥与临床病理结果对照分析[J].贵州医药,2019,43(8):1274-1276.
|
|
|
|