|
|
Effect of individualized psychological intervention in cesarean section perioperative period and its influence on self-efficacy#br# |
MU Na1 SHI Xiaoli2 WANG Shihong3 |
1.Department of Nursing, Shandong Rizhao Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Shandong Province, Rizhao 276800, China;
2.Department of Obstetrics, Shandong Rizhao Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Shandong Province, Rizhao 276800, China;
3.Department of Gynaecology, Shandong Rizhao Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Shandong Province, Rizhao 276800, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the effect of individualized psychological intervention in cesarean section perioperative period and its influence on self-efficacy. Methods From January 2019 to January 2020, 266 women who underwent cesarean section in Shandong Rizhao Maternal and Child Health Hospital were selected as the research objects, they were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 133 cases in each group. The control group received routine perioperative nursing, while the observation group received individualized psychological intervention. Self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were used to evaluate and compare the psychological mood of the two groups before and after intervention, visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to compare the pain degree of the two groups at 12 and 24 h after intervention, general self-efficacy scale (GSES) was used to compare the self-efficacy of the two groups after intervention, operation time, postoperative exhaust time and hospital stay were compared between the two groups, the incidence of postoperative complications such as abdominal distention and urinary retention was compared between the two groups. Results After intervention, SAS and SDS scores of the two groups were lower than those before intervention, and observation group was lower than control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). After intervention, VAS score of observation group was lower than that of control group, GESE score was higher than that of control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05); the operation time, postoperative exhaust time and hospital stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05); after intervention, the total incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Individualized psychological intervention during the perioperative period of cesarean section can enhance maternal self-efficacy, improve maternal bad mood, contribute to improve the recovery after childbirth and obstetrics, which is worthy of clinical reference.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 梁晓玲.观察全程心理护理对剖宫产初产妇疼痛及心理状况的影响[J].中国医药指南,2020,18(3):243.
[2] 李利忍,王文静,李晓博.五行音乐疗法结合手术室陪伴对初产妇术中疼痛度、出血量及应激激素水平的影响[J].中国民间疗法,2019,27(1):107-108.
[3] 朱培,曾静杰.计划性健康教育对剖宫产围手术期产妇护理效果的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2019,4(1):172-174.
[4] 郭瑞,杨慧,何婉雯,等.右美托咪定靶控输注治疗剖宫产术中麻醉并发症寒战肌颤的半数有效剂量[J].山东医药,2016,56(35):83-85.
[5] Moro ET,Silva MAND,Couri MG,et al. Quality of recovery from anesthesia in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs [J]. Braz J Anesthesiol,2016,66(6):642-650.
[6] 宫卓,马彩莲.精细化护理模式对剖宫产产妇康复及产科护理质量的应用效果[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(10):115-119.
[7] 魏艳红.活动性疼痛评估在剖宫产术后疼痛管理中的应用[J].当代护士:下旬刊,2020,27(8):91-93.
[8] 白雁.剖宫产产妇术后疼痛的护理进展研究[J].中国医药指南,2020,18(6):7-8.
[9] 周永安.焦虑自评量表在我国高校大学生中应用的评价研究[D].广州:南方医科大学,2012.
[10] 袁睆.临床中医患双方对四种常用疼痛量表的选择和评分及其影响因素分析[D].长沙:中南大学,2012.
[11] 金贤兰.延吉市老年糖尿病患者失能与自我效能、自我护理能力相关性研究[D].延吉:延边大学,2020.
[12] Garcia C,Lothamer H,Mitchell EM. Provider-identified barriers to cervical cancer screening and perceptions toward self-collection of human papillomavirus in southwest virginja [J]. Pub Heal Nurs,2016,33(6):539-546.
[13] 王祉麟,谭菲,张丹.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的预处理方法探讨[J].成都医学院学报,2020,15(1):102-104, 108.
[14] 陈雪冰,杨玲.卡前列氨丁三醇联合卡贝缩宫素对剖宫产术后止血效果及凝血功能的影响[J].成都医学院学报,2020,15(1):90-93.
[15] 段冬梅,孔淦霞,骆志慧,等.精细化护理对产科护理质量和产妇康复的影响[J].中国现代药物应用,2019,13(1):196-198.
[16] Bergs J,Hellings J,Cleemput I,et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of the World Health Organization Surgical safety checklist on postoperative complications [J]. Br J Surg,2014,101(3):150-158.
[17] 杨亚丽,于素贞.基于ERAS理念护理措施优化对剖宫产初产妇情绪状态和母乳喂养的影响[J].临床医药实践,2019,28(1):66-69.
[18] 尹梦淼.赋能教育对剖宫产后再次妊娠孕妇体质量管理及母婴结局的影响[J].当代护士:上旬刊,2019,26(11):91-93.
[19] 冉颂华.家属共同参与护理计划对足月、单胎头位初产妇经阴道分娩率及总产程的影响[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2019,44(8):1118-1122.
[20] 赵丽娟,杨俊娟,吴文娅,等.连续性心理,行为干预对初产妇剖宫产产后抑郁,自我效能及生活质量的影响[J].国际精神病学杂志,2019,46(5):171-173,193.
[21] 彭小花,赵冬梅,马菊荣,等.健康教育干预对初产妇剖宫产后焦虑、抑郁及母乳喂养依从性的影响[J].中国初级卫生保健,2015,29(12):67-68.
[22] 张丽英,周倩,张月英,等.FCC模式的护理干预对初产妇剖宫产术后纯母乳喂养自我效能的影响[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2019,51(6):738-739.
[23] 朱凤明.产前教育优化模式应用对初产妇分娩效能与结局的影响[J].中国实用医药,2019,14(16):176-178.
[24] 慕年花.连续细致化护理对高危妊娠初产妇结局及产后母乳喂养自我效能的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2019, 23(10):106-109.
[25] 宋玮钕,金珊,俞黎铭.跟踪联动自我管理教育对出院剖宫产妇女母乳喂养的影响[J].中国预防医学杂志,2019, 20(5):368-370.
[26] 孟昭林.自我效能干预对剖宫产产妇术后活动影响的研究[J].当代护士:中旬刊,2018,25(12):63-64.
[27] 杨美娟.增强自我效能干预对初产妇产程进展、负性情绪及分娩结局的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2018,3(15):184-185. |
|
|
|