|
|
Effects comparison between the uterine arterial occlusion and preoperative application of small dosage of Triptorelin in laparoscopic resection of adenomyosis |
GUO Hong1 WU Jun2 XU Mengjiao1 ZHANG Lina1 WANG Jianjun1 TONG Xiaowen1▲ |
1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China;
2.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First People Hospital, Hubei Province, Tianmen 431700, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To analyze the difference of the clinical effects of laparoscopic adenomyosis resection combined with small-dose Triptorelin injected subcutaneously before operation and intraoperative uterine artery occlusion. Methods From January 2014 to October 2016, patients with adenomyosis who underwent laparoscopic resection in Tongji Hospital, Tongji University were divided into two groups according to intraoperative uterine artery ligation (group A, n = 40) and preoperative use of small-dose Triptorelin group B, n=30), and then the differences of surgery time, blood loss in surgery, intestinal function, postoperative complications, length of stay, hemoglobin change of preoperative and postoperative, potassium concentration of postoperative and hospitalization costs were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in length of stay, potassium concentration of postoperation and hemoglobin concentration of preoperation and postoperation between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with group A, the surgery time was shorter, intraoperative blood loss was less, and recovery time of intestinal function was shorter in group B, but the hospitalization costs was higher, the differences were all statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with laparoscopic uterine resection combined with intraoperative uterine artery occlusion, preoperative use of small-dose Triptorelin has shorter surgery time, faster recovery of intestinal function, relatively smaller amount of bleeding, and is safer and more effective, so it is worthy of clinical application.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M]8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:274.
[2] Takeuchi M,Matsuzaki K,Harada M,et al. Susceptibility-weighted MRI of extra-ovarian endometriosis:preliminary results [J]. Abdom Imaging,2015,40(7):2512-2516.
[3] Wood C,Mather P. Laparoscopic hysterectomy [J]. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol,1997,11(1):111-136.
[4] Ding W,Li M,Teng Y,et al. The impact on ovarian reserve of haemostasis by bipolar coagulation versus suture following surgical stripping og ovarian endometrioma:a meta-analysis [J]. Reprod Biomed Online,2015,30(6):635-642.
[5] 华克勤,丰有吉.实用妇产科学[M]3版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:628.
[6] 郭清,赵玮.子宫肌瘤和子宫腺肌瘤高强度聚焦超声的疗效观察[J].中华医学杂志,2015,95(9):693-696.
[7] 胡文红.腹腔镜子宫腺肌瘤切除术的临床体会[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2012,17(6):467-469.
[8] Berkane N,Moutafoff-Borie C. Impact of previous uterineartery embolization on fertility [J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2010,22(3):242-247.
[9] 刘力,程忠平.子宫骶、主韧带精细解剖与妇科微创手术[J].现代妇产科进展,2016,25(9):709-711.
[10] 李阳敏,罗岳西.腹腔镜下子宫三角形切除不同术式阻断子宫动脉的临床应用[J].西部医学,2013,25(5):670-672.
[11] 俞梅,朱兰,郎景和.GnRHa用于大子宫子宫肌瘤腹腔镜isofom疗效的前瞻性研究[J].实用妇产科杂志,2014, 30(8):588-591.
[12] Mehssseb MK,Panchal R,Taylor AH,et al. Estrogen and progesterone receptor isofom distribution through the menstrual cycle in uteri with and without adenomyosis [J]. FeailSteril,2011,95(7):2228-2235.
[13] Morelli M,Rocea ML,Venturella R,et al. Improvement in chronic pelvic pain after gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a)administration in premenopausal women suffering from adenomyosis or endometriosis:a retrospective study [J]. Gynecol Endocrinol,2013,29(4):305-308.
[14] 吕华,夏恩兰.GnRHa治疗子宫平滑肌瘤研究进展[J].国外医学,2006,33(1):33-36.
[15] Akira S,Mine K,Kuwabara Y,et al. Efficacy of long-term, low-dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy (draw-back therapy) for adenomyosis [J]. Med Sci Monit,2009,15(1):1-4.
[16] 王登伦,杨萍,罗璇,等.两种药物对重型子宫内膜异位症腹腔镜术后辅助治疗的疗效观察[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志,2015,2(7):174-175.
[17] 刘霞,张红霞.不同剂量长效曲普瑞林对子宫内膜异位症患者术后的疗效[J].中华医学杂志,2013,93(3);208-211.
[18] 李冬菊,冒韵东.辅助生殖前子宫腺肌病合并不孕的治疗策略[J].国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志,2015,34(4);344-348. |
|
|
|