|
|
|
| Clinical study of filiform needle combined with bone setting in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis |
| LIU Jinying1 LI Changsheng2▲ LI Donghui2 CAI Yongli1 KANG Zhi1 ZHANG Chaodong2 WANG Chunhong2 |
1.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Sanhe Hospital of Hebei Province, Hebei Province, Sanhe 065200, China;
2.Department of Acupuncture, Sanhe Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hebei Province, Sanhe 065200, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To observe the clinical effect of filiform needle combined with bone setting in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods One hundred and thirty cases of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated in Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Sanhe Hospital of Hebei Province, and Department of Acupuncture, Sanhe Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from August 2015 to January 2017 were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, with 65 cases in each group. The treatment group was given filiform needle combined bone setting, with iliform needle once daily, ten days in a course, total of two courses and bone setting once every two days, four times in a course, total of two courses. The control group was given acupuncture combined with bone setting, with acupuncture once daily, ten days in a course, total of two courses, with the same frequency of bone setting in treatment group. The curative effect was evaluated after treatment of two courses and the effective patients were followed up for 3 months. The degree of pain in the waist and legs was evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS). The adverse reactions were observed between the two groups. Results The rate of excellent and good in the treatment group (93.85%) was higher than that of control group (70.77%), with statistically significant difference (P ＜ 0.05). After treatment and at the end of follow-up, the scores of VAS in the two groups were lower than those before treatment, and the scores in the treatment group were lower than that of control group, with statistically significant differences (all P ＜ 0.05). No obvious adverse reactions were observed during treatment in the two groups. Conclusion The curative effect of filiform needle combined with bone setting is better than that of acupuncture combined with bone setting in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. It can alleviate the pain and it is safe. Filiform needle combined with bone setting is a simple, effective and practical treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 刘国军.针刺结合补阳还五汤加减对腰椎椎管狭窄症患者血清中炎性因子水平的影响[J].针灸临床杂志，2016， 32（2）：18-21.
[2] 苏星华.退变性腰椎椎管狭窄症手术治疗的临床效果探讨[J].临床医学，2016，36（11）：95-96.
[3] 游军，陈子华，陈文超.老年退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症非手术治疗与手术治疗效对比[J].临床医学工程，2017，24（1）：61-62.
[4] 周学亮，陈云平，李晓林，等.手术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄的临床分析[J].中华全科医学，2016，14（3）：509-511.
[5] 毛克亚，王岩，肖嵩华，等.微创手术治疗单节段腰椎椎管狭窄症的疗效评价[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志，2011，21（2）：113-117.
[6] 国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准[M].南京：南京大学出版社，1994：203-204.
[7] Fischgrund JS，Mackay M，Herkowitz HN，et al. Degenerativelumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis：a prospectiverandomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation [J]. Spine，1997，22（24）：2807-2812.
[8] 韦以宗，王秀光，潘东华，等.调曲整脊法治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症90例疗效报告[J].中华中医药杂志，2012，27（2）：498-503.
[9] 贾杰海，张静，丁宇，等.老年退变性腰椎椎管狭窄症的治疗进展[J].中国中医急症，2016，25（6）：1077-1080.
[10] 许鹏，史建刚，叶晓健，等.伴根性症状的退变性腰椎椎管狭窄症的选择性治疗策略[J].中国医药导报，2016， 13（18）：97-100.
[11] 王波，王宸，王运涛，等.腰椎椎管狭窄症诊断和治疗的不确定性[J].东南大学学报：医学版，2013，32（1）：121-124.
[12] 周小云，嵇明月，马明云，等.毫火针临床应用心得[J].上海针灸杂志，2012，31（10）：758-759.
[13] 张群，范春兰，许金海，等.火针点刺反阿是穴治疗急性腰扭伤疗效观察[J].上海针灸杂志，2016，35（3）：322-325.
[14] 刘海永.火针结合正骨疗法治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症86例[J].河北中医，2011，33（8）：1196-1197.
[15] 谢建谋，虞露长，陈庆辉，等.毫火针治疗项背肌筋膜炎的临床疗效观察[J].中医外治杂志，2016，25（5）：7-8.
[16] 姚卫锋，李士颖．中医毫火针疗法的研究进展[J].中国中西医结合皮肤性病学杂志，2016，15（4）：258-260.
[17] 田海明，陈晓强，毕建中，等．针刺伏兔配合毫火针点刺阿是穴治疗急性腰扭伤32例的临床观察[J].中国医药导报，2015，12（33）：102-104，108.
[18] 陈晓强，刘海永，周广岳，等.毫火针结合新医正骨治疗第三腰椎横突综合征的疗效研究[J].河北中医药学报，2016，31（2）：40-41，51.
[19] 冯宇.冯天有教授脊柱定点旋转复位法治疗腰椎间盘突出症学术思想研究[D].北京：军医进修学院，2012，13.
[20] 胡思进，王志栋，罗进林，等.腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症两种中医疗法的对比研究[J].中医正骨，2012，24（2）：14-16. |
|
|
|
