Effect of different concentrations of Dexmedetomidine combined with Sufentanil on cancer postoperative analgesia of elderly patients with gastric cancer in laparoscopic radical resection
DONG Haiping ZHANG Lei WANG Zhenhong
Department of Anesthesiology, Renji South Hosptial Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medcine, Shanghai 201112, China
Abstract:Objective To explore the analgesic effect of Dexmedetomidine combined with Sufentanil on cancer postoperative analgesia of elderly patients with gastric cancer in laparoscopic radical resection. Methods Patients with gastric cancer selected period to receive laparoscopic radical resection surgery from January to December 2016 in Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital South Hospital. After the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the total of 90 patients were selected and divided into three groups according to randomized blind method, with 30 cases in each group. Control group (group S): Sufentanil (2 g/kg) + Metoclopramide (20 mg); Dexmedetomidine group with low concentration (group D1): Dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) + Sufentanil (2 g/kg) + Metoclopramide 20 mg; Dexmedetomidine group with high concentration (group D2): Dexmedetomidine (2 g/kg) + Shufentanyl (2 g/kg) + Metoclopramide 20 mg. The degrees of pain (VAS scores) and sedation (Ramsay scores) were observed after operation of 1 (T1), 2 (T2), 6 (T3), 12 (T4), 24 h (T5) and 48 h (T6), and adverse reaction rates among these three groups were compared. Results VAS scores of three groups gradually decreased significantly at postoperative T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6. VAS scores of the D1, Group D2 were significantly lower than those in group S at postoperative T2 to T6, and differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences that VAS scores of group D2 were apparently lower than those in group D1 at postoperative T3 to T6 (P < 0.05). Ramsay scores of three groups increased gradually at postoperative T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 with a significant difference, and Ramsay scores of group D1 and D2 were significantly higher than those in group S at postoperative T5 and T6, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences at the incidence of nausea, vomiting, sinus bradycardia, somnolence and other adverse reactions among three groups (P > 0.05), and there were no obvious respiratory depression happened. Conclusion The synergistic effect of Dexmedetomidine and Sufentanil, can significantly reduce the patients′ pain scores, and doesn’t increase the risk of respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting as well as other complications, which could be considered as a safe and effective method forpostoperative analgesia of elderly patients with gastric cancer in laparoscopic radical resection.
董海平 张磊 王震虹. 右美托咪定复合舒芬太尼用于老年胃癌患者腹腔镜根治术术后镇痛效果观察[J]. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(7): 98-102.
DONG Haiping ZHANG Lei WANG Zhenhong. Effect of different concentrations of Dexmedetomidine combined with Sufentanil on cancer postoperative analgesia of elderly patients with gastric cancer in laparoscopic radical resection. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(7): 98-102.
[1] 邹文斌,李兆申.中国胃癌发病率及死亡率研究进展[J].中国实用内科杂志,2014,34(4):408-415.
[2] 陆宏伟,张亚飞,吉鸿,等.腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效与安全性[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2015,22(3):317-321.
[3] Nie Y,Liu Y,Luo Q,et al. Effect of Dexmedetomidine combined with Sufentanil for post-caesarean section intravenous analgesia: a randomised,placebo-controlled study[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2014,31(4):197-203.
[4] Priye S,Jagannath S,Singh D,et al. Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct in postoperative analgesia following cardiac surgery: A randomized,double-blind study [J]. Saudi J Anaesth,2015,9(4):353-358.
[5] Ge D J,Qi B,Tang G,et al. Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Promotes Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery in Patients after Abdominal Hysterectomy:a Double-Blind,Randomized Clinical Trial [J]. Scientific Reports,2016,6:21514.
[6] Le Bot A,Michelet D,Hilly J,et al. Efficacy of intraoperative Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo for surgery in adults: a meta-analysis of published studies [J]. Minerva Anestesiol,2015,81(10):1105-1117.
[7] 严广斌.视觉模拟评分法[J].中华关节外科杂志:电子版,2014(2):34-34.
[8] 荆双凤,郑丽宏,郑丽坤.盐酸右美托咪定在术后镇痛中的应用[J].现代肿瘤医学,2017,25(12):2008-2010.
[9] Lilker S,Rofaeel A,Balki M,et al. Comparison of fentanyl and Sufentanil as adjuncts to bupivacaine for labor epidural analgesia [J]. J Clin Anesth,2009,21(2):108-112.
[10] Kim DK,Yoon SH,Kim JY,et al. Comparison of the Effects of Sufentanil and Fentanyl Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia after Lumbar Fusion [J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc,2017,60(1):54-59.
[11] 张青,王竹梅.右美托咪啶的药理作用及临床应用进展[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2007,28(6):544-547.
[12] 中华医学会麻醉学分会.右美托咪定临床应用指导意见(2013)[J].中华医学杂志,2013,93(35):2775-2777.
[13] Tekin M,Kati I,Tomak Y,et al. Comparison of the effects of room air and N2O + O2 used for ProSeal LMA cuff inflation on cuff pressure and oropharyngeal structure [J]. J Anesth,2008,22(4):467-470.
[14] 尚宇,康万军,李悦,等.预注右旋美托咪啶用于喉显微手术麻醉的临床研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2010,26(5):385-387.
[15] 马华山,刘金山,李田华,等.右美托咪定复合舒芬太尼用于老年患者术后自控静脉镇痛的效果观察[J].北华大学学报:自然,2014,15(1):58-62.
[16] Antonelli M,Conti G,Belisari A,et al. The use of dexmedetomidine in intensive care sedation[J]. Farmeconomia Health Economics & Therapeutic Pathways,2013,14(1S):1.
[17] Kim SY Chang CH,Lee JS,et al. Comparison of the efficacy of Dexmedetomidine plus fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia for pain control in uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroid tumors or adenomyosis: a prospective,randomized stu [J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol,2013, 24(6):779-786.
[18] Khasawinah TA,Ramirez A,Berkenbosch JW,et al. Preliminary Experience With Dexmedetomidine in the Treatment of Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome[J]. Am J Ther,2003,10(4):303-307.
[19] Abdel-Ghaffar HS,Mohamed SA,Fares KM,et al. Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine in Treating Post Spinal Anesthesia Shivering:A Randomized Clinically Cont?鄄rolled Dose-Finding Trial [J]. Pain Physician,2016,19(4):243-253.
[20] 杜诗斌,李璟,李晓勤,等.右美托咪定对大鼠脊髓背角突触传递的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2016,36(10):1232-1235.