Application of multidisciplinary collaborative follow-up model in patients with atrial fibrillation in the blank period after radiofrequency ablation
LIU Ping1 WANG Yanling2▲ SUN Tingting1 ZHANG Zhili1
1.Cardiovascular Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100176, China;
2.School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
Abstract：Objective To explore the application of multidisciplinary collaborative follow-up model in patients with atrial fibrillation in the blank period after radiofrequency ablation. Methods A total of 120 patients with radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation for the first time admitted to the Cardiovascular Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2018 to May 2020 were enrolled. According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups, the control group (60 cases) received routine follow-up model, and the experimental group (60 cases) received multidisciplinary collaborative follow-up model. Both groups were followed up at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months after discharge. The differences in all dimensions scores of atrial fibrillation effect on quality-of-life (AFEQT) scale between the two groups on the day of discharge and three months after follow-up and other outcome indicators (smoking cessation rate, alcohol abstinence rate, drug omission rate, atrial fibrillation recurrence rate, body mass index difference of overweight patients, readmission rate, bleeding event rate, self-evaluation of health) were compared. Results After three months of follow-up, the differences in all dimensions scores of AFEQT scale, abstinence rate and body mass index difference of overweight patients in experimental group were higher than those in control group, drug omission rate was lower than that in control group, and the self-evaluation of health was better than that in control group, with statistical significance (all P ＜ 0.05). There were no significant differences in smoking cessation rate, atrial fibrillation recurrence rate, readmission rate and bleeding event rate between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05). Conclusion Multidisciplinary collaborative follow-up model is effective in alcohol consumption, weight control, medication management and self-evaluation of health, which can improve the quality of life of patients with atrial fibrillation in the postoperative blank period, and is worthy of promotion and application in clinical nursing work.
刘萍1 王艳玲2▲ 孙婷婷1 张志丽1. 多学科协作随访模式在心房颤动患者射频消融术后空白期的应用[J]. 中国医药导报, 2021, 18(11): 73-77.
LIU Ping1 WANG Yanling2▲ SUN Tingting1 ZHANG Zhili1. Application of multidisciplinary collaborative follow-up model in patients with atrial fibrillation in the blank period after radiofrequency ablation. 中国医药导报, 2021, 18(11): 73-77.
[1] Kirchhof P，Benussi S，Kotecha D，et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS [J]. Europace，2016，18（11）：1609-1678.
[2] 黄从新，张澍，黄德嘉，等.心房颤动：目前的认识和治疗的建议—2018[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志，2018， 32（4）：315-316.
[3] January CT，Wann LS，Calkins H，et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation：A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons [J]. Circulation，2019，140（2）：e125-e151.
[4] 中华医学会.心房颤动基层诊疗指南（2019年）[J].中华全科医师杂志，2020，19（6）：465-473.
[5] 张澍，刘俊，杨红.心房颤动冷冻消融术后空白期内早期复发的特点及其预测价值[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志，2018，32（2）：228-231.
[6] 孙源君，常栋，高连君.心房颤动患者射频导管消融后空白期复发机制及处理[J].中国循环杂志，2017，32（2）：206-208.
[7] 刘俊，方丕华.心房颤动导管消融术后早期复发的研究进展[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志，2018，32（5）：486-489.
[8] 张芸芸，周建国.射频消融术后阵发性房颤患者心率减速力对复发的影响及临床意义[J].中国现代医生，2019， 57（35）：11-14.
[9] Prochaska JO，Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change [J]. Am J Health Promot，1997，12（1）：38-48.
[10] 刘彦淑，任海燕.跨理论模型在冠心病患者健康行为改变中的应用进展[J].中华心血管病杂志，2019，47（4）：331-334.
[11] 延亮，凌青，陈玉红.多学科协作模式对2型糖尿病并发冠心病患者血糖波动及生活质量的影响[J].心脏杂志，2019，31（5）：529-533.
[12] Chung MK，Eckhardt LL，Chen LY，et al. Lifestyle and Risk Factor Modification for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation： A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association [J]. Circulation，2020，141（16）：e750-e772.
[13] 王陇德.健康管理师[M].2版.北京：人民卫生出版社，2019：124-129.
[14] Kato M，Kubo A，Nihei F，et al. Effects of exercise training on exercise capacity，cardiac function，BMI，and quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation：a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials [J]. Int J Rehabil Res，2017，40（3）：193-201.
[15] 陈伟，江华.2016年中国超重/肥胖医学营养治疗专家共识解读[J].中国实用内科杂志，2017，37（5）：430-433.
[16] Spertus J，Dorian P，Bubien R，et al. Development and validation of the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life （AFEQT）Questionnaire in patients with atrial fibrillation [J]. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol，2011，4（1）：15-25.
[17] Wang ZW，Chen Z，Wang X，et al. The Disease Burden of Atrial Fibrillation in China from a National Cross-sectional Survey [J]. Am J Cardiol，2018，122（5）：793-798.
[18] 王雨锋，卢尚欣，夏时俊，等.心房颤动患者发生多次住院的影响因素分析[J].中华心血管病杂志，2020，48（4）：308-314.
[19] 韩晴，芦霜.心房颤动患者疾病接受度的影响因素及其与生活质量的关系研究[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志，2019，27（10）：34-38，49.
[20] 吴奕帆.房颤患者心理状况对房颤症状严重程度和生活质量的影响[C]//上海市护理学会.第四届上海国际护理大会论文汇编，2019：839-840.
[21] 曾惠明，肖凌晖，谢维.多学科团队在结直肠癌肝转移诊治中的临床应用[J].中国当代医药，2020，27（34）：105-107，117.
[22] 王利芳，海洁，郝倩，等.专科护士主导的多学科照顾团队在老年糖尿病患者院外延伸护理中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志，2020，26（13）：1779-1783.
[23] 李群.多学科协作模式在老年精神病护理中的应用进展[J].中国现代医生，2019，57（27）：165-168.
[24] 任天琦.多学科团队合作模式在老年高血压合并慢性心衰患者护理中的应用[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志，2020，8（2）：145，147.
[25] 贾朝旭，蒋超，卢尚欣，等.体重控制与超重及肥胖患者心房颤动射频消融术后复发的关系[J].中华心血管病杂志，2019，47（8）：595-601.
[26] Bowyer JL，Tully PJ，Ganesan AN，et al. A Randomised Controlled Trial on the Effect of Nurse-Led Educational Intervention at the Time of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation on Quality of Life，Symptom Severity and Rehospitalisation [J]. Heart Lung Circ，2017，26（1）：73-81.
[27] 白娟，杨健.跨理论模型与多学科协作方案在神经外科病区护理中的应用[J].海军医学杂志，2020，41（2）：212-214.
京公网安备 11010502046598号