Abstract：Objective To compare the curative effect between the proximal coated tapered stem prosthesis and the fully coated rectangular stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods From March 2018 to March 2019, a total of 64 patients with THA in Jizhong Energy Xingtai Mining Group General Hospital were selected, and a total of 32 patients with proximal coated tapered stem prosthesis and fully coated rectangular stem prosthesis were used. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were compared, GE dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to monitor the bone mineral density values around the prosthesis before and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the operation. And 6 months after surgery, Harris score and the incidence of adverse reactions of the prosthesis were combined the changes in bone mineral density, clinical efficacy and safety of the two prostheses were compared. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time and intraoperative blood loss (P ＞ 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in bone mineral density between the two groups and times in Gruen 1 and 7 areas (P ＜ 0.05). The time point of the fully coated rectangular stem prosthesis group was higher than that of the proximal coated tapered stem prosthesis group, the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). The Harris scores of the two groups at 6 months after surgery were significantly higher than those before surgery, while the fully coated rectangular stem prosthesis group was higher than that of the proximal coated tapered stem prosthesis group, and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). Re-examination of the DR images of the two groups at 12 months after the operation showed that the prosthesis was in good position, and there was no loosening, sinking, or re-fracture around the prosthesis. Conclusion Proximal coated tapered stem prosthesis and fully coated rectangular stem prosthesis used in THA to treat hip fractures have better results and safety, but the fully coated rectangular stem prosthesis is better than the proximal coated tapered stem prosthesis. It has advantages in terms of bone ingrowth around the prosthesis, relief of postoperative pain and faster recovery of joint function.
高峰 李通宪 李会侠 曹旭阳 孟丽颖 杨建波. 近端涂层锥形柄与全涂层矩形柄在全髋关节置换术中的疗效比较[J]. 中国医药导报, 2021, 18(3): 93-96.
GAO Feng LI Tongxian LI Huixia CAO Xuyang MENG Liying YANG Jianbo. Comparison of the curative effect of proximal coated tapered stem and fully coated rectangular stem in total hip arthroplasty. 中国医药导报, 2021, 18(3): 93-96.
[1] Godoy Monzón D，Iserson KV，Jauregui J，et al. Total hip arthroplasty for hip fractures：5-year follow-up of functional outcomes in the oldest independent old and very old patients [J]. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil，2014，5（1）：3-8.
[2] Hopkins SJ，Toms AD，Brown M，et al. A study investigating short- and medium-term effects on function，bone mineral density and lean tissue mass post-total knee replacement in a Caucasian female post-menopausal population：implications for hip fracture risk [J]. Osteoporos Int，2016， 27（8）：2567-2576.
[3] Grune B，Fallon M，Howard C，et al. Report and recommendations of the international workshop retrieval approaches for information on alternative methods to animal experiments [J]. ALTEX，2004，21（3）：115-127.
[4] 蒋维海，孙微.全髋关节置换术后假体周围骨密度和骨代谢的变化及临床意义[J].中国现代医学杂志，2018，28（23）：69-72.
[5] 常青，孙凯，刘瑞.Zweymiiller非骨水泥型全髋关节初次置换术后8～10年病例随访[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究，2019，16（2）：15-20.
[6] Sandiford NA，Garbuz DS，Masri BA，et al. CORR insights?誖：Nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems osseointegrate reliably at short term in revision THAs [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res，2017，475（1）：186-192.
[7] Petursson T，Edmunds KJ，Gislason MK，et al. Bone mineral density and fracture risk assessment to optimize prosthesis selection in total hip replacement [J]. Comput Math Methods Med，2015，20（12）：162-169.
[8] 黄彦，廖壮文，黄文铎，等.骨水泥型人工股骨头置换术后患者全身与股骨假体周围骨密度变化[J].中国老年学杂志，2010，8（30）：2268-2270.
[9] Matsumoto T，Nakamura I，Miura A，et al. Partial transmalleolar approach for lateral impingement after total ankle arthroplasty：a case report [J]. J Foot Ankle Surg，2015， 54（2）：233-236.
[10] 王蒙，唐华羽，王福成，等.股骨假体周围骨折治疗现状及研究进展[J].中国老年学杂志，2020，40（1）：219-222.
[11] 屈瑾，雷新玮，展影，等.髋关节表面置换术假体柄固定方式对股骨近端骨密度及应力影响[J].中华医学杂志，2014，94（35）：2769-2771.
[12] 菅志飞，孙维，曹洪，等.复方中药强骨饮强化髋关节置换后假体周围骨密度：随机对照半年评定[J].中国组织工程研究，2015，19（39）：6286-6290.
[13] Nadkarni GN，Patel AA，Ahuja Y，et al. Incidence，risk factors，and outcome trends of acute kidney injury in elective total hip and knee arthroplasty [J]. Am J Orthop（Belle Mcad NJ），2016，45（1）：12-19.
[14] Waddell BS，Zahoor T，Meyer M，et al. Topical tranexamic acid use in knee periprosthetic joint infection is safe and effective [J]. J Knee Surg，2016，29（5）：423-429.
[15] Mounsey EJ，Williams DH，Howell JR，et al. Revision of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty using the cement-in-cement technique [J]. Bone Joint J，2015，97（12）：1623-1627.
[16] Wilkinson JM，Hamer AJ，Rogers A，et al. Bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty [J]. J OrthopRes，2003，21（4）：691-696.
[17] 姚进.不同材料髋关节假体在髋关节置换中的应用[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复，2011，15（17）：3196-3199.
[18] 于振涛，韩建业，麻西群，等.生物医用钛合金材料的生物及力学相容性[J].中国组织工程研究，2013，17（25）：4707-4714.
[19] 孙俊英，郝跃峰，杨沛彦，等.采用羟基磷灰石涂层股骨柄假体行全髋关节置换术的早期疗效[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2006，8（1）：27-30.
[20] 刘振东，范清宇.应力遮挡效应-寻找丢失的钥匙[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2002，4（1）：62-64.
[21] 应用C2锥形扁柄假体行生物学固定型全髋关节置换术的中期疗效[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2013，15（2）：118-122.
[22] 周鹏，赵辉，吴宇黎，等.钛合金假体表明涂层微孔孔径和孔隙率对骨整合的影响[J].山东医药，2017，57（16）：12-16.
[23] 徐斌，李强，杨宗华，等.羟基磷灰石涂层假体全髋置换术的中期随访结果[J].河北医学，2015，21（2）：265-269.
[24] 徐敬，徐海栋，赵建宁，等.羟基磷灰石股骨假体在全髋关节置换术中应用效果的Meta分析[J].中国骨与关节杂志，2015，4（7）：568-573.
[25] 刘贯聪，李瑞延，梁豪君，等.钛合金表面生物活性涂层及成骨效果的研究与进展[J].中国组织工程研究，2017，21（6）：969-974.
2021, Vol. 18 
京公网安备 11010502046598号