Comparison of the early stages of the development of independent student enrollment
LIU Xiaohui1 TIAN Runping1 ZHAO Jianlei2 AI Hua3 WANG Ying1 QIAO Qingbin1 XU Meilin1 ZHOU Yizhen1
1.Office of Enrollment and Employment, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488, China;
2.College of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488, China;
3.Department of Student Work, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488, China
Abstract：Objective To explore the laws and similarities between the independent enrollment sources and the general enrollment sources in the early stages of school development after admission. Methods From September 2018 to August 2019, part of the independent admissions students (experimental group) and ordinary admissions students (control group) admitted by Beijing University of Chinese Medicine in 2017 were used as research objects. Campus cultural activities were compared with the four dimensions of social practice, psychological quality and personal development satisfaction score. Results In 2018, a total of 190 questionnaires were issued, and 176 were effectively recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 92.63%. While in 2019, 350 questionnaires were issued, and 316 were effectively recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 90.29%. In 2018, the interpersonal skills and relationship scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group, and the differences were highly statistically significant (P ＜ 0.01). In 2019, the interpersonal communication ability, the relationship with the teacher, and the relationship with the classmates of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05 or P ＜ 0.01). In 2018, the participation in campus cultural activities score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). In 2019, the views on social practice and participation in campus cultural activities of the experimental group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were highly statistically significant (P ＜ 0.01). In 2018, the positive emotion score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group, while the negative emotion score was lower than that of the control group, and the differences were highly statistically significant (P ＜ 0.01). In 2019, the positive affective score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference was highly statistically significant (P ＜ 0.01). In 2018, the learning ability, innovation ability, practical hands-on ability, and adaptability satisfaction score of experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05 or P ＜ 0.01). In 2019, the satisfaction scores of academic development, innovation ability and practical ability of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). Conclusion As far as the surveyed items are concerned, the comprehensive quality of independent enrollment students is relatively higher than that of ordinary enrollment students in the early stages of university education.
刘晓辉1 田润平1 赵建磊2 艾华3 王鹰1 乔庆彬1 许美琳1 周益桢1. 自主招生生源学涯发展早期阶段的比较[J]. 中国医药导报, 2020, 17(15): 56-59.
LIU Xiaohui1 TIAN Runping1 ZHAO Jianlei2 AI Hua3 WANG Ying1 QIAO Qingbin1 XU Meilin1 ZHOU Yizhen1. Comparison of the early stages of the development of independent student enrollment. 中国医药导报, 2020, 17(15): 56-59.
[1] 李雄鹰.大学自主招生质量的实证研究[J].中国高教研究，2013（6）：34-39.
[2] 王恒草，何龙，张桓等.教育公平视域下招生制度改革研究[J].教育教学论坛，2019（42）：224-225.
[3] 蔺旭鹏.公平视域下高校自主招生人才选拔评价体系构建研究[J].湖北开放职业学院学报，2019，32（18）：55-57.
[4] 刘永亮.高校自主招生政策的话语制度主义分析[J].高教探索，2019（6）：11-15.
[5] 付慧宇，范鹏，秦川.高校自主招生模式的发展趋势探析[J].中国轻工教育，2019（3）：26-29.
[6] Daniela S，Tim H，Nicole S. Experiential learning：Helping students to become ‘career-ready’ [J]. AMJ，2018（26）：163-171.
[7] 刘什芹.大学生心理健康教育创新策略探究[J].兰州教育学院学报，2018，34（4）：91-92，95.
[8] 高璐.大学生人际交往问题探析[J].陕西青年职业学院学报，2017（4）：60-63.
[9] Graf J，Smolka R，Simoes E，et al. Communication skills of medical students during the OSCE：gender-specific differences in a longitudinal trend study [J]. BMC Med Educ，2017，17：75.
[10] Taveira-Gomes I，Mota-Cardosoa R，Figueiredo-Braga M. Communication skills in medical students—an exploratory study before and after clerkships [J]. Porto Biomed J，2016，1（5）：173-180.
[11] 郑伟，陈昊.以课外科技创新活动为载体的大学生创新能力培养的实践与研究[J].科技信息：学术研究，2008（9）：346-349.
[12] 杨若兰，刘小峰，郭成洋.社会实践视域下的大学生就业创业能力提升研究[J].教育教学论坛，2019（43）：49-51.
[13] 刘东.浅谈当代大学生校园文化活动对学习质量的影响[J].科教文汇：下旬刊，2019（7）：29-30.
[14] 王方，杨世昌，李琦.大学生常见负面情绪分析与对策研究[J].吉林省教育学院学报，2014（10）：31-32.
[15] 崔爽.试论积极情绪视域下大学新生适应能力的培养[J].辽宁广播电视大学学报，2017（4）：25-27.
[16] Wanli X，Hengtao T，Bo P. Beyond positive and negative emotions：Looking into the role of achievement emotions in discussion forums of MOOCs [J]. Int H Edu，2019，43：1-9.
[17] 侯佳伟.高校自主招生学生入学后与普考生的对比分析[J].高等教育研究，2011（12）：34-39.
[18] 杨巧文，王启宝，刘淑琴，等.加强应用化学专业建设培养大学生的动手能力[J].广东化工，2019，46（8）：191-192.
[19] 王珊珊.学生创新意识及创新能力的提高探析[J].现代商贸工业，2019，40（33）：99.
[20] 梁小佳.大学生物理创新意识培养的几点思考[J].课程教育研究，2019（44）：196-197.
2020, Vol. 17 
京公网安备 11010502046598号