Relationship of VEGF-C, VEGFR3 expression and its prognostic significance in lung cancer
LI Jingbo1,2 XIA Hui2 LIU Yang1,3
1.Medical School of Chinese People′s Liberation Army of China, Beijing 100853, China;
2.Department of Thoracic-cardio Surgery, the Fourth Medical Center of People′s Liberation Army of China General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China;
3.Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Medical Center of People′s Liberation Army of China General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
Abstract:Among the currently known members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family, the biological effects of VEGF-C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR3) attract more and more attention. VEGF-C and VEGFR3 are not only the most important signaling pathways regulating lymphangiogenesis, but also important factors affecting prognosis. Studies on lung adenocarcinoma have shown that high expression of VEGF-C and VEGFR3 may be associated with higher lymph node metastasis rate, and there is a positive correlation with the density of microlymphatic vessels, leading to low survival rate and poor prognosis in patients. Therefore, inhibition of VEGF-C and VEGFR3 high expression in lung adenocarcinoma can effectively reduce tumor lymphangiogenesis and metastasis. However, the relationship between VEGF-C and VEGFR3 expression and prognosis in lung squamous cell carcinoma has been controversial. This study explores the relationship between VEGF-C and VEGFR3 expression and prognosis in different types of lung cancer, and provids ideas for later treatment.
李璟波1,2 夏晖2 刘阳1,3. 肺癌中VEGF-C、VEGFR3表达与预后的关系及意义[J]. 中国医药导报, 2020, 17(6): 30-32,52.
LI Jingbo1,2 XIA Hui2 LIU Yang1,3. Relationship of VEGF-C, VEGFR3 expression and its prognostic significance in lung cancer. 中国医药导报, 2020, 17(6): 30-32,52.
[1] Lee S,Kang HG,Jin Eun Choi,et al. The Different Effect of VEGF Polymorphisms on the Prognosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer according to Tumor Histology [J]. J Korean Med Sci,2016,31(11):1735-1741.
[2] Jayakumar T,Liu CH,Wu GY,et al. Hinokitiol inhibits migration of A549 lung cancer cells via suppression of MMPs and induction of antioxidant enzymes and apoptosis [J]. Int J Mol Sci,2018,19(4):939-942.
[3] 吴强,张祥海.CD147、血管内皮生长因子C在肺鳞状细胞癌和腺癌中的表达及其临床意义[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2016,28(5):311-314.
[4] 林国辉,王燕,杨家盛,等.老年肺癌组织HMGB1、MMP-9及VEGF-C的表达及临床意义[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(9):2105-2107.
[5] 姚月娟,王艳,王星,等.肺癌外周血VEGF-C及VEGF-R3检测的临床价值[J].国际肿瘤学杂志,2017,44(4):262-265.
[6] 何刚,王洪斌,刘海林,等.Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌组织血管内皮生长因子C、细胞角蛋白19表达与患者预后的相关性[J].现代生物医学进展,2019,19(8):1471-1475.
[7] 王远航,薛斌.三种诱导因子在骨髓间充质干细胞向淋巴管内皮细胞分化中的作用[J].中华烧伤杂志,2019,35(2):125-133.
[8] Lai X,Li Y,Gao M,et al. Biochanin A regulates the growth migration of NSCLC through suppressing the VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling pathway [J]. Oncol Res,2018,23(5):14-19.
[9] 兰杰.培美曲塞联合顺铂对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者血清VEGF-C、TL-6、MMP9表达的影响[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2017,32(6):701-703.
[10] Daly S,Kubasiak JC,Rinewalt D,et al. Circulating angiogenesis biomarkers are associated with disease progression in lung adenocarcinoma [J]. Ann Thorac Surg,2014,98(6):1968-1975.
[11] 郭添胜,韩靖.VEGF-C及VEGFR-3在肺腺癌组织中的表达及意义[J].广东医学,2012,33(24):3793-3795.
[12] 邹亮,高慧淳,周建洪,等.VEGF-C、COX-2在细支气管肺泡癌中的表达及其意义[J].中国癌症防治杂志,2011,3(4):306-309.
[13] 黄穗华,蒋玲,邓杰方.非小细胞肺癌VEGF-C的表达与LYVE-1标记的微淋巴密度和淋巴结转移的关系[J].中国医药科学,2015,5(3):12-14.
[14] 彭武君.肺鳞癌患者手术前后血清VEGF-C、IL-6及MMP-2水平变化及其临床意义[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2019,26(3):494-497.
[15] Sanmartin E,Sirera R,Blasco A,et al. A gene signature combining the tissue expression of three angiogenic factors is a prognostic marker in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2014,21(2):612-620.
[16] 吴迎宵.非小细胞肺癌组织中血管内皮生长因子-C的表达及其临床病理意义的探讨[J].海峡药学,2019,31(5):83-86.
[17] 汤忠祝,朱远,胡小云,等.放化疗前后检测非小细胞肺癌外周血HIF-1α、VEGF-C表达的临床意义探讨[J].中华全科医学,2015,13(4):538-540.
[18] 代学利,王文利,申屠阳,等.肺腺癌和鳞癌中VEGF-C和新生淋巴管表达的预后价值[J].中国肺癌杂志,2011, 14(10):774-779.
[19] 王琰,陈豫民,李娇娇.STAT3和VEGF在肺鳞癌组织中的表达及其临床意义[J].现代肿瘤医学,2018,26(5):705-708.
[20] 李凤珍.VEGF-C和VEGFR-3在非小细胞肺癌组织中的表达及其临床意义[D]延安:延安大学,2013.
[21] 李玉灵,赵华,魏枫,等.VEGF-C/VEGF3通路对肿瘤患者外周血来源DC的影响[J].中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志,2016,23(3):392-396.
[22] 李玉灵,赵华,任秀宝.VEGF及其受体与免疫抑制细胞关系的研究进展[J].山东医药,2016,56(17):105-107.