725例子宫肌瘤患者三种手术途径行全子宫切除术的临床情况分析
刘雨声 张颖 段华 郭银树▲
首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院妇科微创中心,北京 100006
Efficacy of three approaches for hysterectomy in patients with uterine myoma
LIU Yusheng ZHANG Ying DUAN Hua GUO Yinshu▲
Gynecology Minimally Invasive Center, Beijing Obstetricsand Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University,Beijing 100006, China
摘要 目的 研究子宫肌瘤患者需行子宫切除三种手术途径(开腹、腹腔镜、阴式)全子宫切除术的临床效果。 方法 回顾性分析2009年9月~2015年1月首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院因子宫肌瘤行全子宫切除患者725例的临床资料,患者分为开腹全子宫切除术组(TAH组,283例)、腹腔镜全子宫切除术组(TLH组,251例)和阴式全子宫切除术组(TVH,191例)三组,分析各组手术时间、术中出血、术后排气时间、术后进食时间、术后体温、并发症及住院时间和住院费用等指标。 结果 三组比较,TAH组患者术中出血最多,TLH组手术时间最长、住院费用最高,但TLH组术后最高体温、术后排气时间、术后进食时间、术后住院时间及总住院时间均最低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。TAH、TLH和TVH组并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 除手术时间略长,住院费用较高以外,TLH在术中出血、术后恢复、术后住院时间和总住院时间等方面均优于TVH、TAH。三种全子宫切除途径各有利弊,临床应根据不同情况选择合适的子宫切除方式。
关键词 :
全子宫切除术 ,
子宫肌瘤 ,
临床效果 ,
并发症
Abstract :Objective To compare the efficacy of three operative approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy, vaginal) for hysterectomy in patients with uterine myoma. Methods From September 2009 to January 2015, in Beijing Obstetricsand Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, the clinical data of 725 patients received hysterectomy for uterine myoma were retrospectively analyzed, they were divided into three groups: trans-abdominal hysterectomy group (TAH group, 283 cases), trans-laparoscopic hysterectomy group (TLH, 251 cases) and trans-vaginal hysterectomy group (TVH, 191 cases). The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative exhaust time, eating time, body temperature, complications, hospitalization time and costs of three groups were compared. Results Three groups were compared, intraoperative bleeding of TAH group was the highest, operative time was the longest, hospitalization costs was the highest, postoperative highest body temperature, exhaust time, eating time, postoperative hospitalization time and total hospitalization time were the lowest, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The complication rates of three groups were compared, the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion TLH is superior to TVH and TAH in terms of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative recovery, hospitalization time and total hospitalization time, except of a longer operative time and higher hospitalization costs. All three hysterectomy approaches have their own advantages and disadvantages, suitable surgical procedure should be chosen according to different condition.
Key words :
Hysterectomy
Uterine myoma
Efficacy
Complication
基金资助: 北京市医院管理局临床医学发展专项(ZYLX 201406)。
通讯作者:
▲通讯作者
[1] Giraudet G,Niro J,Lucot JP,et al. Management of myoma:what is the place for hysterectomy and how to perform it?[J] Presse Med,2013,42(7-8);1133-1137.
[2] 曹泽毅.中华妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:2083-2101.
[3] Deffieux X,de Rochambeau B,Chêne G,et al. Hysterectomy for benign pathology:Guidelines for clinical practice [J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris),2015,44(10):1219-1227.
[4] 刘新民.妇科手术学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:142-199.
[5] 王沂峰,夏恩兰.全子宫切除术相关问题与思考 [J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(4):649-651.
[6] Gale J,Cameron C,Chen I,et al. Increasing Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy:A Canadian Academic Health Centre Experience [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2016,38(2):141-146.
[7] Gauthier T,Huet S,Marcelli M,et al. Hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease:Surgical approach, vaginal suture method and morcellation:Guidelines [J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris),2015,44(10):1168-1182.
[8] Blikkendaal MD,Schepers EM,van Zwet EW,et al. Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2015,292(4):723-738.
[9] Allam IS,Makled AK,Gomaa IA,et al. Totallaparoscopic hysterectomy,vaginal hysterectomy andtotal abdominalhysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2015,291(6):1341-1345.
[10] Loring M,Morris SN,Isaacson KB,et al .Minimally invasive specialists and rates oflaparoscopic hysterectomy [J]. JSLS,2015,19(1):e2014.00221.
[11] Colling KP,Glover JK,Statz CA,et al. Abdominal hysterectomy: reduced risk of surgical site infection associated with robotic and laparoscopic technique [J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt),2015,16(5):498-503.
[12] Shepherd JP,Kantartzis KL,Ahn KH,et al. Costanalysiswhen open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy [J]. JSLS,2014,18(4):e2014.00181.
[13] Smith LH,Waetjen LE,Paik CK,et al. Trends in the safety of inpatient hysterectomy for benign conditions in Califonia,1991-2004 [J]. Obstet Gynecol,2008,112:553-5561.
[14] 贺红英,李力,陈江鸿,等.腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗妇科良性疾病疗效的系统评价[J].中国循证医学医学杂志,2013,13(1):62-69.
[15] 伍凤莉,罗立华,申桂华,等.阴式子宫切除适应症及并发症探讨[J].实用妇产科杂志,2005,21(7):439-440.
[16] Rooney CM,Crawford AT,Vassallo BJ,et al. Is previous cesarean section a risk for incidental cystotomy at the time of hysterectomy A case-controlled study [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2005,193(6):2041-2044.
[17] Clarke-Pearson DL,Geller EJ.Complications of hysterectomy [J]. Obstet Gynecol,2013,121(3):654-673.
[18] Fuentes MN,Rodríguez-Oliver A,Naveiro Rilo JC,et al. Complicationsof laparoscopic gynecologic surgery [J]. JSLS,2014,18(3):e2014.00058.
[19] Semera P,Farina C,Todros T. Laparoscopic myomectomy and Subsequent pregnancy result in 54 patients [J] .Hum Reprod,2000,15:1993-1996.
[20] 陆宏,刘佳,王晓彬,等.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与经腹子宫肌瘤剔除术对子宫肌瘤患者术后妊娠的影响[J].中国医药导报,2015,12(12):102-106,111.
[21] Jo EJ,Lee YY,Kim TJ,et al. Management and outcome of rectal injury during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2013,20(2):166-171.
[1]
马俊昌 陈进 宋志会 陈思 袁键冰. 3D打印技术在成人肱骨远端骨折治疗中的应用 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(9): 83-85,101.
[2]
王翔 谭业农 谢柳 吴小秦. 补中益气汤联合耳后注射治疗突发性耳聋的临床效果 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(9): 137-140.
[3]
徐畅 陈英 陆玉莲. 达菲林联合腹腔镜术治疗子宫内膜异位症的临床效果 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(8): 84-87.
[4]
魏景美 汪晓洲. 缬沙坦联合卡托普利治疗老年高血压患者的临床效果 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(7): 88-91.
[5]
杨应浩1 姚谦明1▲ 程国雄1 徐振球1 谭红愉2. 丘脑底核脑深部电刺激术辅助治疗帕金森病的临床效果 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(5): 68-71.
[6]
吴阔 刘孟奇▲ 赵庆书. 唑来膦酸联合同期放化疗治疗晚期乳腺癌骨转移的临床效果 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(5): 96-99.
[7]
李江利 龚冠闻 张传灼 张翼. 胰腺炎外科手术的治疗效果及对患者TNF-α、IL-6水平的影响 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(4): 88-91.
[8]
爱新觉罗启承1 李昶1 范永宏1 郭静2 王炳海1. “八”字双切口钢板内固定治疗跟骨骨折常见并发症及影响因素分析 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(18): 69-72.
[9]
付海平 王飞. 经皮微创治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的临床效果 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(14): 104-108.
[10]
刘宇 李冬华 王文娜 韦超 邱甜甜. 理冲汤对异种移植子宫肌瘤小鼠免疫逃逸相关因子的影响 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(13): 12-15.
[11]
徐雨 丁佑铭▲ 赵凯亮. 肝移植术后脾动脉盗血综合征的诊治方法与预防进展 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(12): 27-30.
[12]
宋玉光 李杰 蔡建平 陈绩. 单侧入路双侧减压与双侧棘突旁小切口入路双侧减压在腰椎管狭窄症内固定术患者中的应用效果比较 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(12): 62-65.
[13]
周京元 索南昂秀. 腓肠肌腱瓣翻转加固术与改良Kessler缝合术治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂的效果比较 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(12): 66-68,84.
[14]
骆艳妮1 谢梅2 吴媛1 苏丹1 王佩1 陈江1. 临床路径在急性呼吸功能衰竭患者护理中的应用效果 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(11): 150-153.
[15]
骆艳妮1 王春亚1 李金娜3 谢梅2 赵海宁1 李红玲 1. 集束化干预措施在ICU病房应用呼吸机进行机械通气患者中的应用效果 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(10): 173-176.