梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体检测灰区范围分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献(20)
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (631 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨化学发光法检测梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体的灰区范围，提高梅毒实验室检测的有效性和准确性。方法收集解放军总医院第五医学中心2016年2月～2018年5月采用化学发光法检测梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体，样品吸光度与临界值的比值（S/CO）为1~9（拟定灰区）的患者，以梅毒实验室逆向检测流程及免疫印迹法结果为金标准，评价化学发光法检测灰区的假阳性率。结果采用化学发光法检测梅毒螺旋体抗体患者25 190例，灰区患者462例（1.83%）。其中S/CO值1~3患者234例，假阳性率为0.74%；S/CO值＞3~6患者109例，假阳性率0.27%；S/CO值＞6~9患者119例，假阳性率0.12%，三组比较差异有统计学意义（P ＜ 0.05）。选取假阳性率较低的S/CO值＞6~9组患者比较，S/CO值＞6~7时假阳性率为0.072%，S/CO值＞7~8时假阳性率为0.024%，S/CO值＞8~9时假阳性率为0.020%，三组比较差异有统计学意义（P ＜ 0.05）。结论化学发光法检测梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体，在拟定灰区范围内，假阳性率随S/CO值升高呈现降低趋势。灰区范围宜设定为S/CO值1~7。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	赵静卞成蓉李伯安王晗

关键词 ：化学发光法, 梅毒螺旋体抗体, 灰区, 假阳性率

Abstract：Objective To investigate the grey area of Treponema pallidum specific antibody detected by chemiluminescent immunoassay, and improve the validity and accuracy of syphilis laboratory diagnosis. Methods The patients with cut-off (S/CO) value 1 to 9 (assumed grey area) of Treponema pallidum specific antibody detected by chemiluminescent immunoassay from February 2016 to May 2018 were collected from the Fifth Medical Center in General Hospital of PLA. The false positive rate of chemiluminescent immunoassay in grey area was evaluated by using the methods of reverse detection process of syphilis laboratory and the results of immunoblotting as gold standard. Results A total of 25 190 cases were detected by chemiluminescent immunoassay, and 462 cases (1.83%) were observed within grey area. The false positive rate was 0.74% in 234 cases with S/CO values ranging from 1 to 3, 0.27% in 109 patients with S/CO values ranging from greater than 3 to 6, and 0.12% in 119 patients with S/CO values ranging from greater than 6 to 9. There was a significant difference among three groups (P < 0.05). Comparison of S/CO values in greater than 6 to 9 patients with lower false positive rate, the false positive rate of S/CO value greater than 6 to 7 was 0.072%, the false positive rate of S/CO value greater than 7 to 8 was 0.024%, the false positive rate of S/CO value greater than 8 to 9 was 0.020%, and the difference between three groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion In the assumed grey area, when the specific antibody of Treponema pallidum is detected by chemiluminescent immunoassay, the false positive rate showes a decreasing trend with the increase of S/CO value. The gray area should be set to S/CO value of 1 to 7.

Key words： Chemiluminescent immunoassay Treponema pallidum specific antibody Grey area False positive rate

基金资助:国家科技重大专项项目（2017ZX10304403004004）；
军队生物安全专项任务。

通讯作者: 李伯安（1972-），男，博士，全军感染病临床实验诊断中心主任，主要从事免疫学研究；王晗（1981-），男，博士，全军感染病临床实验诊断中心副主任，主要从事免疫学和抗体工程研究。

引用本文:

赵静卞成蓉李伯安王晗. 梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体检测灰区范围分析[J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(16): 151-154.
ZHAO Jing BIAN Chengrong LI Boan WANG Han. Analysis of grey area of Treponema pallidum specific antibody detection. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(16): 151-154.

链接本文:

http://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/CN/Y2019/V16/I16/151

[1] Sommese L，Paolillo R，Sabia C，et al. Syphilis detection：evaluation of serological screening and pilot reverse confirmatory assay algorithm in blood donors [J]. Int J Std Aids，2016，27（8）：644-649.
[2] Cruz AR，Ramirez LG，Zuluaga AV，et al. Immune evasion and recognition of the syphilis spirochete in blood and skin of secondary syphilis patients：two immunologically distinct compartments [J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis，2012，6（7）：e1717.
[3] Jantzen SU，Ferrea S，Langebner T，et al. Late-stage neurosyphilis presenting with severe neuropsychiatric deficits：diagnosis，therapy，and course of three patients [J]. J Neurol，2012，259（4）：720-728.
[4] Sommese L，Sabia C，Esposito A，et al. Comparison of performance of two Treponema pallidum automated chemiluminescent immunoassays in blood donors [J]. Infect Dis（Lond），2016，48（6）：483-487.
[5] 王林.酶联免疫吸附试验“灰区”不合格在无偿献血血液检测中的作用与意义[J].检验医学与临床，2014，11（2）：237-238.
[6] 李媛，谭艳.ELISA检测血清HBsAg、抗-HCV、抗-TP、抗-HIV灰区设定的探讨[J].国际检验医学杂志，2017， 38（6）：810-812.
[7] 国家卫生健康委员会.中华人民共和国卫生行业标准-梅毒诊断（WS 273—2018）[S]. 2018-03-06.
[8] 房华，吴燕芬，汪瑞忠，等.全自动化学发光免疫分析仪在梅毒螺旋体抗体检测中的临床应用[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志，2010，24（7）：671-672.
[9] Zhiyan L，Meiling W，Ping L，et al. Consistency between Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay and architect chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay and characterization of inconsistent samples [J]. J Clin Lab Anal，2015，29（4）：281-284.
[10] 董旭才，刘昕阳，张婧，等.酶联免疫吸附法检测梅毒抗体试验灰区结果分析[J].国际检验医学杂志，2014，35（5）：598.
[11] 赵娟，谭延国.化学发光法检测梅毒抗体的实验评价[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志，2008，22（10）：626-627.
[12] Wang KD，Xu DJ，Su JR. Preferable procedure for the screening of syphilis in clinical laboratories in China [J]. Infect Dis（Lond），2016，48（1）：26-31.
[13] 陈兰兰，邵燕玲，王巧凤，等.自动化梅毒螺旋体抗体初筛实验的研究[J].中华检验医学杂志，2013，36（10）：891-894.
[14] Zhu WF，Lei SY，Li LJ. Hepatitis C virus infection and biological false positive syphilis test：a single-center experience [J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int，2011，10（4）：399-402.
[15] Ong JJ，Fu H，Smith MK，et al. Expanding syphilis testing：a scoping review of syphilis testing interventions among key populations [J]. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther，2018，16（5）：423-432.
[16] Li Z，Feng Z，Liu P，et al. Screening for antibodies against Treponema pallidum with chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay：analysis of discordant serology results and clinical characterization [J]. Ann Clin Biochem，2016，53（Pt 5）：588-592.
[17] Ortiz DA，Loeffelholz MJ. Evaluation of the lumipulse G TP-N chemiluminescent immunoassay as a syphilis screening test [J]. J Clin Microbiol，2017，55（11）：3236-3241.
[18] 曹雁，杨围，毛跃，等.43例梅毒假阳性结果分析[J].西南军医，2006，8（5）：48-49.
[19] Alan F，Heather L. HCV Antibody Tests [J]. Hcvadvocate Org，2013，11（5）：1-4.
[20] 赵静，马洪滨，陈霖，等.酶联免疫加速仪与水浴孵育方法对梅毒螺旋体抗体检测的比较[J].医疗卫生装备，2013，34（11）：61-62.